bootloaders should always be packaged with a pacman hook
Linux
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
Like u/lukmyly013 said, I'd love an official KDE version to mint. It isn't that hard to get going, and I like cinnamon well enough on most things, but there are a few situations where I'd like to have plasma out of the box
EndeavourOS:
- Install portals along with Flatpak, depending on DE (+ GTK, always)
- btrfs + assistant, snapper, snap-pac as default (ideally also bootable snapshots)
- Provide not only printer, but also scanner support
- Enable pstate driver for AMD CPUs by default
- 1-click solution to enable recommended tweaks for gaming / interactive use
- On KDE desktop:
- Add dbus service to start Kwallet
- Configure Kwallet to require no password, but confirmation for access
- Ship with Discover
Arch install script could be better. The dedicated /home partition is a pain if you don't know what you're doing (I don't know what I'm doing). The encryption thing also breaks a lot of things.
PopOs
Not have 10s of GBs of updates every week. I mean seriously wtf.
For Arch Linux:
- support a different process supervisor
- dinit, or
- s6 with some high level sugar
- don't use Bash anywhere
- port down to POSIX, and
- port up to Zsh
- port minimal launchers to execline
- replace PKGBUILD format, maybe with
- nearly identical but Zsh
- NestedText containing Zsh snippets
- use this to render Zsh based on templates
- my favorite template engine: wheezy.template
- use this to render Zsh based on templates
- build packages with more optimizations, like the CachyOS repos
- include or endorse something like aconfmgr
- port conf files to NestedText
pacman
would allow me to install weak dependencies with a simple command-line option rather than black magic wizardry that rivals ffmpeg filtergraphs.
You can use pacman -S --asdeps if that’s what you mean by “weak dependencies” iirc.
Kubuntu
Remove snap < caused loads of shit back in the day, now it's an extremely slow installation system that wants to force me to use it. Fuck you.
Remove systemd < promised to be a super fast init system, took over loads of shit it has nothing to do with and ended up being nothing faster at all. Now my logs are sometimes in actual log files, you know, easy text, sometimes they're in the headache callled journalctl. I always change my SSH server port (Ubuntu server) that was a quick config file change and restart ssh, now it's making systemd files, and 10 minutes to do. Its a constant headache and I fucking hate everything about it
Arch: Move more of the things shipped by the distro to /usr/
, too many things are still in /etc/
, /var/
and /srv/
. Generally this isn't a problem, but when you want to make an A/B updated image where only /usr/
is shipped it is a bit annoying. Also, bash
has no way to have a "distro" version of /etc/profile
.
Another benefit is: no .pacnew
files in /etc/
(or anywhere else) since those would all be managed by the system maintainer and aren't touched by the package manager
I wish Ubuntu was just xUbuntu by default and that xfce didn’t have like 4 different settings menus for no reason. I’d also like it if there was a minimalist icon theme by default, and a dock like old school vanilla Ubuntu.
Oh and better multi monitor support
Debian needs a better installer. It'd be awesome if it had something more akin to Fedora/RHEL's Anaconda, or even just made Calamares the default (so long as it didn't install every single locale available like their live inages currently do).
I wish Debian had a version with more recent software that is suitable for regular use. I know many people use Testing and Sid, but Testing often has delayed security updates and it’s not unusual for Sid to break. And both get weird around the freeze for the next release. It would be great if there was a version like Tumbleweed that was constantly rolling and received automated testing to prevent many of the problems Unstable experiences.
I currently use Tumbleweed on my computers and Debian on my servers, but I would love to use Debian on everything.
Nothing. Artix gives me all the freedoms.
I would want a FreeBSD type of packaging system where system libraries and apps are different. Their binary packages are separated into quarterly and latest so you get a very stable OS but either Debian or arch style package updates.
Stop using stupid adjective/animal for release names. When editing an apt list I don't want to have to lookup "which release was 'xenial'?" Just use the yy.mm format.
Bring back Linux Mint KDE
For Fedora, replace the current installer (Anaconda) with the openSUSE Tumbleweed installer.
One of the aspects I love about the openSUSE TW installer is the ability to remove groups of packages for the initial install. This is particularly useful if you never use certain programs or intend to replace them with the Flatpak version.
The everything ISO is more granular, but not to the point of openSUSE. Way back in the day you could mess with package selections in depth.
The distro itself? Idk I usually just write an ansible playbook to get everything to my liking. Run it once on a new install and everything is good.
I wish Debian had better support for software that wants to do its own package management.
They do it a little bit with python, but for most things it's either "stay within the wonderful Debian package management but then find out that the node thing you want to do is functionally impossible" or "abandon apt for a mismashed patchwork of randomly-placed and haphazardly-secured independently downloaded little mini-repos for Node, python, maybe some Docker containers, Composer, snap, some stuff that wants you to just wget a shell script and pipe it to sudo sh
, and God help you, Nvidia drivers. At least libc6 is secure though."
I wish that there was a big multiarch-style push to acknowledge that lots of things want to do their own little package management now, and that's okay, and somehow bring it into the fold (again their pyenv handling seems like a pretty good example of how it can be done in a mutually-working way) so it's harmonious with the packaging system instead of existing as something of an opponent to it. Maybe this already exists and I'm not aware of it but if it exists I'm not aware of it.