Linux

48364 readers

1753 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

124

What would you change about your favorite Linux distribution? (lemm.ee)

submitted 9 months ago by tet@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

215 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Stop using stupid adjective/animal for release names. When editing an apt list I don't want to have to lookup "which release was 'xenial'?" Just use the yy.mm format.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have never really been an Ubuntu user. When I started reading your comment, I was thinking “well that seems like a prettt small nitpick”. Then I realized the problem and now I am 100% behind you. You are right, they elate throwing away one of the greatest strengths of the distro in that releases ( numbered releases ) have easy to understand and very meaningful names.

So much information thrown away just to be cute.

Is there a reason? Do the dots in the release numbers confuse things? Or is it purely historical?

Somebody needs to create a fork of APT that does this ( uses release numbers instead ). It could translate the release numbers you use in your sources file to the code names before making the request. I mean, they are unambiguously convertable.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Is there a reason? Do the dots in the release numbers confuse things? Or is it purely historical?

I think it goes back to Debian using "Toy Story" characters for releases - they're in the same bed here as Ubuntu (I'm running "bullseye"). I'm not sure how it started but it's too cute for no gain. At least the docker images are tagged with both so you don't need to remember whether "jammy" is an LTS or not.