this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
638 points (92.9% liked)

You Should Know

33201 readers
129 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why YSK?

The first person who typed "should of" probably heard of it in real life that was meant to be "should've", they typed "should of" online and readers thought that it's grammatically correct to say "should of" which is in fact wrong and it became widespread throughout the years on Reddit.

I hope something could start to change.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hardypart@feddit.de 113 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

I'm not a grammar nazi, but "should of" is driving me up the wall.

[–] ronaldtemp1@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know right, I know people make careless grammatical mistakes all the time, including me, which is completely fine but people outright thought that "should of" is correct and use it all the time starts to get annoying

[–] Today@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Same! I rather see shoulda than should of.

[–] lhx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

But more importantly, where do you stand on the Oxford comma?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't crash to the floor. That'd hurt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Art3sian@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Nice one. Who’d’ve guessed.

[–] quantumantics@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn't've, that's for sure!

[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As a non-native speaker, that hurts !!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] denemdenem@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

😱 You are triggering my fear of more than 1 apostrophes in a word

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Lemmyin@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] MigratingApe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn’t it actually “For Fuck’s sake”?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ronaldtemp1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

lol I remember reading this on Quora

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’m certainly no grammar freak and English also isn’t my native language but this deives me insane… Same with your vs you’re… it’s soooo easy…

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Sonemonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Should of" is bone apple tea material.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ndr@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Typing "should of" is a sign of failing to understand the basics of English grammar.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] gigachad@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even as a non native speaker "should of" feels really weird to me, it just doesn't make sense. Is this a mistake English speakers do as well?

[–] raresbears@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty sure it's actually one of those mistakes that is made more often by native speakers than non-native speakers

[–] KiofKi@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

It's like theyre/theire/they're - in my experience it's mostly native speakers confusing them.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I’ve seen have in textbooks way more than ’ve and it’s baked into my brain... This mistake only happens if you hear the word before seeing it written.

[–] DesGrieux@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

It's because "should've" and "should of" are pronounced the same. It doesn't make sense because they're just writing what they hear instead of thinking "I'm using the contraction of the auxiliary verb 'have'"..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Exi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My in-laws and I have a Signal group where we share fun spellings and pronunciations. We call it "udder mayham." It's fun.

I could care less.

This one is popular.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

udder mayham

That's an eggcorn right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gigate@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

"Should of" is evidence of someone who never, ever reads.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] erisir@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

language is full of idiosyncrasies like this (my favorite is an ekename -> a nekename -> a nickname. see Wikipedia). it's perfectly conceivable that should have would be fully re-analyzed in speech like that, so the proper form of the verb to have would become of after should

[–] Chaser@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Same deal with the word "Apron". It started out as napron, so people would say a napron which turned into an apron

[–] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Crazy thing is, it’s getting widespread acceptance, and will probably accepted as grammatically correct in a few years.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

A bit like how putting "would" in a third conditional if-clause has become standard in US English ("We wouldn't have been late if we would have taken a taxi").

I know language evolves but it doesn't stop my left eye from twitching whenever I hear it.

[–] axtualdave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not until the definition of the word "of" changes. It is not a synonym for the word "have," nor will be anytime soon.

Perhaps, when speaking, accent, mush-mouthed laziness, or plain ignorance will confuse "should have" and "should of", but one is objectively correct, and one is not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raresbears@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

ITT: Awful linguistics takes

[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Damn I should of known this

[–] Tyr_Raidho_Othala@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Damn, and here I thought Redditors were the only ones who couldn't detect a joke

[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Lmao right? This is obviously a joke

[–] lenguen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Golly, I should of known that

[–] Black616Angel@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago
  • Golly, eye should of noun that
[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[–] gyrodaddy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had a professor who would use “should of” in speech, probably because he read it so much and internalized it as being correct.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ashralien@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

should of is probably a product of phonetic typing (those who just type the letters that match the internal audio) or when siri first launched voice typing and no one bothered to check it. Edit: Should of should've died a long time ago tbh. could do with a mini-crusade.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›