this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
215 points (95.4% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump does not like to lose, as his announcement that he is seeing(sic) new attorneys to appeal the $83 million defamation judgment proves.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 95 points 9 months ago (19 children)

He also called the judge a “bully” and implied that imposing rules, including evidentiary regulations and courtroom behavior, on Trump and his attorneys was evidence of bias.

a bully? amazing how this fascist strongman can be such an absolute bitch all the time too.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They all are. It's a thing for them.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Conservatives are the biggest snowflakes, afraid of everything. They are like those little yappy dogs that bark at everything

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

For fascism to work, the other must be simultaneously weak and strong.

[–] flipht@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The whole gag to fascism is that it is 100% projection at all times, both internally and externally.

They attack people because they're afraid to get attacked and they can't imagine a situation where everyone isn't thinking exactly like them, so of course it's only a matter of time before they're attacked...and thus must attack.

It's circular and deeply uncreative, but it is the root of every bully, from the playground to the autocratic despot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Losers do loser things - way to go, Pumpkin Tits!

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

And deep down, he knows this to his core. “Bully” implies a victim who cannot protect themselves (and is therefore ‘weak’ to authoritarians), while the bully has all the strength and power.

Donald could have chosen from a number of non-SAT words his followers can digest easily, that wouldn’t betray his actual self image. Challenger. Punk. Hater. Obsessed. Crooked. Hell , even calling him a Democrat plant/operative/etc would have played better

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 45 points 9 months ago

Donald Trump does not like to lose

You'd think he'd be used to it by now.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago (17 children)

I was assured multiple times on Lemmy that Habba wasn't stupid and that she was doing Trump's bidding in a crafty way.

Apparently she's just stupid.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Anyone that defends him is stupid. Not only is he guilty as hell he won't shut the fuck up and follow his councils advise. I mean, a paid gig is a paid gig, when your client actually pays you, but there's no way you'll leave his service with a better rep than when you started.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if she'll be smart enough to sue Trump for her legal fees. I doubt she remembered to ask for payment up front.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

You'd have to know how to submit your lost wages into evidence, which she does not

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Remember, even a C student can get a law degree.

[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I recently heard another one that gave me a chuckle:

What do you call the lowest of the lowest performing graduate at law school? A lawyer....

Same goes for this one, and quite possibly scarier:
What do you call the lowest of the lowest performing graduate at medical school? A doctor....

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And everyone who didn't pass?

Chiropractor.

Fun fact that works for both.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

I was assured multiple times on Lemmy that Habba wasn’t stupid and that she was doing Trump’s bidding in a crafty way.

Apparently she’s just stupid.

I'm assuming every other lawyer at this point declines on ethical grounds or those that don't have any scruples say "You have a history of not paying lawyers so I'll need cash up front to represent you" and Trump keeps on looking. Removing those groups and you get Habba as your lawyer.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

Good job or bad, Trump will find a way to not pay you for doing it. Of this, there is no more golden rule.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

She was still doing his bidding. He bidding was just also stupid, and his narcissism would not let him see that

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 9 months ago

Expect her to complain about pay in two weeks. Trump will hire a"better lawyer" and the appeal will go wonderfully. He will tank it just like all of his cases. In the past he would get away with stuff but do to the publicity he is finally getting punished.

[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Pretty soon Trump would have had more lawyers than he has voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Maybe Giuliani is free?

In both that he's not busy and will work for exposure.

Legal exposure, of course.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I believe Rudy is also suing him for not paying his legal fees, so that door's been shut - maybe he'll have another press conference in front of a lawn care store to sweat about it.

[–] Beefytootz@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

A lawn care store carefully placed between a sex shop and a crematorium

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

He's still free for a little while longer, but he's been disbarred.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Now she can stop pretending to be smart & pretend to be employable instead.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

She's definitely employable by OAN and NewsMax. Fox, also, if she bleaches her hair.

[–] Hairyblue@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

She is one of the beautiful people, but pretty don't win lawsuits. Trump didn't know that. Trump is dumb and ugly, and has smalls hands.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

Did the payday deadline just pass?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

He doesn't seem to understand that he's on a race to the bottom for lawyers.

The ones who could (potentially) win the case, will never take it. The ones who will take the case have no hope of winning it.

[–] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Two funny questions: will she sue him for back pay?, and can he really afford new lawyer now?

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Does (sic) stand for "spelling is crappy"?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

(sic) is the abbreviation for the Latin phrase "sic erat scriptum" or "thus was it written".

It's used when quoting someone who made an error and you are quoting them verbatim. It's to let you're audience know that YOU know better, but the quoted source does not.

Example:

"It's to let you're (sic) audience know that YOU know better."

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for this. Always wondered about this but never asked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

IDK what it stands for, but it's used where theres a mistake in a quote. It's the journalist saying "yes I know that's wrong but that's what the person reallg wrote".

I've heard that if you're nice to a journalist they'll tidy up minor issues like that, but if they don't like you they'll leave it incorrect and give you a [sic]

[–] tipicaldik@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

yes I know that’s wrong but that’s what the person reallg (sic) wrote

like that? ;)

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It's short for "sic erat scriptum" which is Latin for "thus it was written"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

His only strategy is to string this out on appeals and I guess ineffective counsel is one appeal? Not sure if that’s allowed in this type of case of if you’re the person who had possibly the most lawyers of all time.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No appeals based on incompetent/ineffective counsel for a civil case. In a criminal case, a convicted defendant may appeal on the grounds of ineffectiveness of counsel at trial. This principal arises because of the constitutional right to be represented by counsel. Such a right would be meaningless unless it implies a right to effective counsel. There is no such constitutional right to counsel in a civil case, and therefore no such ground for appeal in a civil case.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

LOL did they dial up the orange on that photo?

Because I didn't think he could go anymore Oompa Loompa, but damn.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›