this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
159 points (93.4% liked)

News

22886 readers
4126 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 57 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

"Americans spend $19 billion dollars using credit cards in one month"

Fixed it for you. A whole lot of us use credit cards exclusively. And we pay it off each month.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Could be. The article tries to paint a picture where that isn't quite the case:

"Wells Fargo reported on Fed data showing several regions experiencing a tightening in credit availability and an uptick in delinquency rates, pointing to a growing financial burden on households."

"Specifically, the New York Fed noted an increase in financial pressure among families with high debt burdens. Similarly, the Philadelphia Fed observed a widening gap where low-income households are reducing their spending but incurring more debt, contrasting with high-income households that continue to spend freely."

It's not a complete picture so I guess people are free to fill in the gaps as they please, but I don't see anything definitive here.

[–] CannedTuna@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well and the month they’re talking about happens to be November. Gee, I wonder why so many Americans were making purchases in November.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Sure, but the graph in the article shows a continuing increase. November is when it crossed the $5 trillion mark, and it was surely boosted due to holiday shopping, but the trend is ever-increasing.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I'm close to a thousand £ back in rewards over the few years I've been using it. It costs me £2 every month and i get a minimum of £20 back per month. But if I can pay for my car insurance or something truly big? Oh boy do my cash back go through the roof!

Could i live on debit alone? Sure. But then i wouldn't get hundreds back every year for simply using my card.

[–] ABoxOfPhotons@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (6 children)

For a while, i wondered why Americans tend use their credit cards instead of debit cards but then it occurred that they are encouraged to use credit cards because you cant get into debt using debit cards and debt is very profitable.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 53 points 7 months ago (5 children)

There's that, but there are also more legal consumer protections against fraud with credit cards than with debit cards.

[–] vic_rattlehead@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Also debit cards don't earn cash back or points. I visit my cousins on airline points. Monitor your cards and make sure you don't exceed your budget, same as a debit card.

[–] Pissnpink@feddit.uk 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They do if you use a credit union. I bank through two, and both offer cash back equivalent to any credit card, multiple overdrafts without fees, higher intrest rates on both checking and savings, access to better loan intrest rates, and I'm keeping my money in my community.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

I love my credit union, and while my debit card does get points my credit card gets more points

[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is not a thing at any credit union around me.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

6% on groceries adds up.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

You also have to have credit to get loans. I ran into this issue when I bought a house. I hadn't had a credit card in years because it was too easy to get into debt. The only thing that saved me is I am on one of my folks credit cards for rare emergencies if I'm watching their house and something goes awry (like the dehumidifier shits all over the basement floor and needs replaced).

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I would totally use my debit card more if it has the same level of fraud protection that credit cards have.

It'd be nice to be able to do a chargeback on a debit card transaction.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Do you understand why there are so many incentives to use credit cards? Your reply and those under you are listing why credit cards are the better choice, however I wonder if they all know they are being played.

Those that use their credit card and pay it off in full are subsidized by the number of people that spend beyond their means.

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Those that use their credit card and pay it off in full are using them responsibly, the way they should be used.

FTFY, the rest of your comment is just wrong.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Right. So the extra features are paid for by swipe fees. So why don't debit cards have the same set of features? Because banks want you to use the type of card that has the most return potential. Not wrong, just a difference of opinion.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LethalSmack@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You’re getting played if you don’t use one. All those rewards are not from the people racking up credit card debt, it’s from swipe fees.

If you don’t use a credit card you pay the same price as the ones paying with a card, except the ones with a card get rewards. The ones without pay extra since stores charge extra to cover the fee

They even lobbied successfully to prevent merchants from passing this on to credit card customers. Which means they pass it on to all customers instead.

The fees are currently capped at 2.5% but that’s just for the swiped. There are other fees as well that end up costing the merchant more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you’re responsible with them you get a number of perks. Many cards have some mix of the following:

  • extended warranties on electronics
  • fraud protection (I had a credit card stolen and $17k charged to it, all forgiven)
  • pretty easy dispute system if someone fucks you (Iceland Air fucked me real bad on a canceled flight/voucher bs scam they were pulling on people during Covid. I filed a dispute and got all my money back)
  • % back on all kinds of purchase categories
  • free road side assistance
  • air miles
  • upgrades in flights
  • iirc some hotels and rental car companies require them
  • etc etc

I’ve never paid interest on a single card in my life because I always pay my balance in full. Works out great for me. If you’re bad with money, I’d stay way.

[–] Mamertine@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

This!

There are a lot of consumer protections on credit cards that do not apply to debit cards. I pay for basically everything with a credit card. I pay the card off every month.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think people realise that, you are actually paying for all those things, just in a roundabout way. Even people without credit cards are

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but that's just how it goes. Businesses take their transaction fees and roll that up into their overhead expenses and then factor out their retail pricing with that in mind.

Knowing that, you can try to claw some of that back by utilizing card benefits or not. It's basically the only thing you do have control of in this situation.

[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Eh, the more you claw back, the more they jack up their overheads.

Never wonder why credit cards never became that popular in other countries, or why lots of places abroad have signs saying "American Express not accepted"?

You're getting robbed, and walking right into it.

Debit cards have the same consumer protection as credit cards in Europe, the only "benefits" you're getting are the ones you've paid for

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

We also can't get cashback rewards with the vast majority of debit cards. It adds up.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

It’s also because a lot of people see the rewards as ways of getting free money. However that’s really only the case if you pay your card regularly. As well some Americans truly don’t have the required income to live. So they go into debt. It’s terrible, sad, and wrong on so many levels, but it’s a major part as well.

[–] weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Frankly I use my credit card as my debit card. Hell I don't even have a physical debit card. Why you ask? Rewards points.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

because you cant get into debt using debit cards

Lol that's cute. They've recently started changing this shit, but at least when I was in college, banks were 100% putting people into debt and making tons of money on overdraft fees. For using debit.

They had a program called, "overdraft protection" that customer service loved to sign you up for if you accidentally overdrafted. That should fix things right?

Lol no. Turns out what they meant by "protection" was "protection from your card being declined." In other words, if a purchase was going to put your account into the negative, instead of simply declining the transaction and preventing the customer from incurring a fee, it makes sure the purchase goes through, and the customer is charged $35 for overdrafting.

They also had a practice of re-ordering a customer's transactions in order to maximize overdraft fees. I believe this one has been illegal since Obama though.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

All to the benefit of the oligarchs of this nation, which will get bailed out if they don't anyway.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

oooOoOoo - getting dangerously close, aren't we? What happens when say people take out more credit than US banks can actually honour?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Fair... but what I was alluding to is a banking crash that will make the "great recession" seem like a fart in the wind.

Think the LA riots, but in every major city, military being mobilised, civil war, the next violent revolution, what have you - because that debt hole will make a crater out of society.

And no, you don't want violent revolution. Why? Germans didn't become Nazis overnight. The economic collapse after WW1 put Germans in the position of being forced to bring wheelbarrows of cash to the store for a single loaf of bread. This made German people so desperate and angry that... well, you know the rest.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why do you sound excited? This would literally ruin the entire century and maybe the next one.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

...I did? I'm sorry, that was not the intention. Could you please point out which phrases and sentences that raised concerns?

Or was it the first post? The "oooOoOoo" part? Maybe I was a bit hamfisted, but I was trying to allude to historic cases of massive bank defaulting. Perhaps I was a bit brash.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You're fine, it did come off a bit like some accelerationist fanfic I've heard

[–] Chuymatt@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago

BUT THE ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is definitely an order of magnitude calculation, but doesn't that correspond to $60 per person in the US? Is this big number scary article?

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Depends. Are you dividing by total population or actual cc holders? Because the latte isn't as big.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Stats from some googling. Assuming there are 250 million adults in US, and 80% have credit cards, that gives me 200 million holders, or ~$100 per person. That's not really a whole lot of money anymore. Not in a world where taco bell costs $20.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ya I just checked and you're right. However, we could still infer certain trends.by examining the shift

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Agreed. The article also includes a consumer debt trend over time. It seems to outpace inflation by about 33% which is more noteworthy to me.

[–] init@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's an espresso way to debt central that's for sure

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Mocha money mocha problems amirite

[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Hooch, hookers and coke or wage theft?

load more comments
view more: next ›