this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
132 points (95.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26851 readers
2315 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Savaran@lemmy.world 70 points 9 months ago (2 children)

50s. Getting back to one’s 30s you’re still old enough for people to take you seriously, but the creaking bones and exhaustion hasn’t really started creeping in yet.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 60 points 9 months ago (2 children)

the creaking bones and exhaustion hasn’t really started creeping in yet.

Uhhh about that

[–] Savaran@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Well, just saying, what creaking bones I had in my 30s don’t even rate in comparison now

[–] SteefLem@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wife and i were talking about that yesterday. I turned 50 last year and its like my body just decided that everything should brake down all at once.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] illi@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

chuckles I'm in danger

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Start doing morning stretches, drink more water, and avoid caffeine after 5pm

[–] PhiAU@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Avoid caffeine after 5pm"

Laughs in ADHD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Ugh I turn 30 today, I've had a bum knee for like 15 years and now the arthritis is starting in my thumbs 🙄

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] athos77@kbin.social 54 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't take it. I give it to my cat, who died one day after her twentieth birthday.

[–] neuroneiro@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] neuroneiro@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Pass me my towel.

[–] forty2@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 6 points 9 months ago

Username checks out

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nemo@midwest.social 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No earlier than 45. Otherwise you're headed back into territory where your body and brain are still developing – fuck with that and you might not feel right in your own body.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it's gotta be in the late 40's.

By then, you've got all the aches and pains, and you'll know better to take care of things like your posture! Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I'm 42. Does everyone get a pill? My wife? My kids? My parents?

Jumping back 20 years puts me out of sync with everyone I care about. I'm not sure I'd even want it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I’m tempted to say 40, so I can relive the most physically fit part of my life, but maybe I should wait until I’m really old. Not sure

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah stick with 40. What are you gonna do, be like "yeah it feels great being only 50 years again! Glad I passed up having a second twenties." If you heard someone say that you'd think they were insane.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True, but I was a doofus in my twenties. I suppose it depends if we get to keep our collected wisdom/lack of fucks or not

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If I can't keep my thoughts and memories, it's not the pill for me

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd take it today. I'm in my 50s, I'm an endurance athlete (I race bikes) and the calculus looks like: if I wait 20 years I get to experience body-age 50-70 twice, but if I take it now I experience 30-50 twice. Living my prime twice is better than enduring my decline twice, thanks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'd take it right now.

Not married, not dating, and no kids.

Getting 20 years back means I can correct a lot of mistakes and I'll have way more energy and focus to be the me I want to be. My 20s were so stressful I started getting white hair.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago

Let's say hypothetically this repairs organ damage.

I have 2 choices. I can save the pill for when I or a loved on is in serious danger of death or I can do a shit ton of LSD, like an absurd amount of LSD, enough to actually break me and then reset.

It's a tough choice /s

[–] jwing@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

For your first 20-40 trip, you could stay childless and live it up, see the world.

Then, on your second 20-40 trip, you could have kids while still physically fit and able to keep up with them and have fun.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

The problem with that is that (now that I'm in my 40s) I don't like to be around kids for long periods of time, and have come to see anyone under ~25 as a kid. Would I be able to stand being around myself (or my new peers)?

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It would be weird to have kids with someone who is effectively 20 years younger than you, though.

You either go with someone physically the same age who is of a completely different generation from you, or you go with someone mentally your age who you may not be able to have kids with without risking a higher chance of congenital disorders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The day your health becomes a problem requiring more than regular effort to maintain.

That’ll rewind the clock to a lot of good years that maybe you can push back the decline a little further. Your clock will run out eventually, it’s inevitable. You just want to maximize the good years, not just youth or keeping yourself from death.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Like, if I go from 35 to 15 do I go back to school, clear student loan debts, etc?

Because redoing the lead up and college with the maturity to actually try would probably be good.

[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Key question here. I'd take it at 37 and go back to being 17 with the skills, knowledge, and experiences and most importantly income of my 37 year-old self. But, I'd pass myself off as 18. Unless, of course, it's not a secret. In which case the strategy totally changes.

If it's known and knowable that I took this drug, then I'd take it at 55 and de-age to 35. Then, when my kids are in their teens and tweens, I'll have the energy for their B.S. Also, when I retire at 95 (b/c seriously, retirement wont be a thing for me), I'll only be 75 and I'll still be able to fight off some of the horde of lawyer-bots, advertisclones, and chain letters that are coming after my pension.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

40, I want to go back to when my body was in great condition. At 20, I didn't feel any of the aches and pains I had in my early 30s. It would give me 10 years to do a better job taking care of it and hopefully avoid the current state it's in now.

[–] Geek_King@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I'm 42, I was fat in my 20s and didn't lose 100 pounds and get in shape until 31. I'd gladly take that pill right this instant, make a lot of different choices, lose my weight and get in shape at a younger age too. I would have a very different life I bet.

But alas, your theoretical pill just taunts "Now Me"!

[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Assuming this is a tablet, I chop it in half and my wife and I both enjoy being in our twenties again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I don't understand the premise. Do I keep my older memories and experience? So if I take it at age 21, I become a 1yo with the knowledge of a college student? Do I also get to repeat having the memory and learning speed that little kids have? It might be worth considering.

[–] solitaire@infosec.pub 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Going with the just de-age interpretation and not time travel, it has to be late enough I could still pass for an adult but I'd want it before any of my chronic health conditions emerge so I can mitigate them. I don't want to look younger, I just want the health benefits.

I can't go back to being a kid because where the hell would new identity documents come from? I still have to be able to live my current life more or less. I suppose 35 is the absolute minimum for me to take it, at 15 I wasn't getting carded buying alcohol. I reckon at that age with the right presentation I could pass for 20 at least, and a 35 year old seeming that young isn't completely unheard of.

I can't go too much older because issues start compounding in my 20s. I'd love to have picked a post development age - aside from my health, I didn't really get comfortable in my own skin until then - but it'd be too late. Maybe 40 so the worst of puberty is over, but that's probably my limit.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So I take this pill, and I become physically younger. I don't move back in time, I'm still legally a 36 year old, but I look and feel like I'm 16.

It depends on how this works. Is the pill a magic spell where there's a poof and I'm in my previous body as it was 20 years ago, or is it just "damage and wear and tear are undone?" Because I've had a few surgeries I don't want to redo in the last 20 years; I don't want my wisdom teeth or appendix back. I've had a dental implant since then, does that reverse itself...is a bicuspid going to try to grow out of my skull through the titanium socket bone grafted into my face?

For practicality's sake I think no earlier than 43, simply because...at that point your younger self is a fully developed adult; if someone cards you and says "You're telling me you're 43 years old?" You can say "Yeah I've had some work done."

Much younger than 40 years old and you have to repeat portions of adolescence and/or childhood, which would be inconvenient at best.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

Counterpoint: I didn't discover I was trans until after the wrong puberty made being trans a lot harder. Going back to before that would let me right a pretty grand sense of wrongness.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Now, because I miss being in my 20s and not feeling weak or easy to injure

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] forty2@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I turned 44 just the other day; honestly, without a doubt I'd have taken the pill the day before my 21st birthday. One big do-over and minimal responsibilities to manage after the de-aging.

  • ✔️ Someone taking care of me 24/7 for a period measured in years?
  • ✔️ School? What a joke. Ace everything, be a social and intellectual prodigy?
  • ✔️ No bills, no responsibilities?
  • ✔️ Boundless energy and Wolverine-like healing?
  • ✔️ One set of friends in their 40s with life and professional advice/connections for you as you turn 21; and another set of friends your own age bursting with enthusiasm, ideas, and a gleam in their eye?

Like, I'm not seeing a downside to this over here...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sramder@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Going with 47 and six-ish months… no reason 😅

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gramathy@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

I’ll take it but only if the manufacturer brands it NuGame+

[–] chameleon@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

38-41ish. It'd be awkward to de-age below the appropriate local age of alcohol/consent/whatever, but that aside you wanna do it as early as possible. It's 20 more years of having a functional body, no reason to delay when you might randomly get hit by the bus tomorrow.

[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

I'd take it immediately. Whether it rolls back time as well, or just my physical/biological age, having that reset is good. For time, it lets me be able to jump on financial trends before they happen such as bitcoin. Also lets me redo some stuff I fucked up. For biological age it's just regaining my youth and let's me get on HRT earlier than I did which would've been beneficial. I kinda threw away the past 15 years, so having a redo would be nice.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

24 seems a decent time. Returning to the brain plasticity of a 4 year old with all of the memories and knowledge of a 24 year old would produce a horrific intellect and potential. Society would leap forward in any task you decide to advance. The indescribable isolation may well be the only issue, but piles of money heal many forms of hurt. See: Magic Johnson

[–] just_ducky_in_NH@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That. . . sounds horrifying.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›