this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
374 points (96.5% liked)

politics

18986 readers
3870 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Glaringly obvious" incompetence on display as judge tells jury to "disregard everything Ms. Habba just said"

Trump lawyer Alina Habba struggled through her cross-examination of E. Jean Carroll on Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is overseeing the defamation case against the former president, repeatedly admonished the attorney for running afoul of his court rules and general procedures.

Prior to Carroll’s testimony, Habba requested an adjournment so that Trump could attend his mother-in-law’s funeral.

“The application is denied. I will hear no further argument on it. None. Do you understand that word? None. Please sit down,” Kaplan, a Bill Clinton appointee, told Habba about the motion that he already denied.

Kaplan repeatedly interrupted Habba’s questions, including when she began to read from a document that had not been formally entered into evidence, sending the trial to a recess.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 143 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm so tired of this two-tiered justice system. Just once, for fuck's sake, treat this sack of shit like you would a black teenager caught with weed in Texas.

[–] Quetzlcoatl@sh.itjust.works 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just give him an Airsoft rifle to play with and let nature take its course.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

Or swap his orange makeup for a darker shade and hand him some skittles in Florida.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Ho-lee-fuck...8 years in mostly solitary and then released without a trial!!!

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 83 points 8 months ago (5 children)

This case is just like the New York one. The matter of guilt is already settled, only the award remains.

The real lawyers will work on the real case, witch is the appeal. Habba's job is to make headlines, keep Trump in the news, and fight every inch no matter how useless. Just because her behavior makes her a bad lawyer, doesn't mean she's not serving her client, or that she's dumb. Habba's legal work probably amounts to tens of millions of dollars in free prime time advertising for Trump's reelection.

Trump's strategy is to be in the news everyday. So many scandals that only Rachael Maddow can keep it all straight. Is it a good strategy? It worked in 2016.

[–] RavenFellBlade@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Make no mistake, her job is incredibly simple: stall and waste as much of the court's time as possible and give Trump potential mistrial grounds.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago

When I read about her glaringly obvious mistakes (according to an article regarding admitting evidence,stating positions on things where the judge said she'd turn into a witness if her statement was true) that was the first thing that came to mind, she's there to make it last longer, and doesn't seem like the courts have a way to handle it well without a new trial so it goes slowly. Trump is like a full blown security test on US political and legal systems and they aren't performing well to his strategies.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just because her behavior makes her a bad lawyer, doesn’t mean she’s not serving her client, or that she’s dumb.

Doesn't she risk being debarred?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't know her plans, but it wouldn't matter to me if I made bank off this one clown show of a trial. Dress me up! 🤡

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just because her behavior makes her a bad lawyer, doesn’t mean she’s not serving her client, or that she’s dumb.

¿Por qué no los dos?

She does serve Trump. She is undoubtedly following not just his specific orders but his ongoing strategy of obstruction, confusion, dogwhistling and chaos-sowing wherever she can.

But she's ALSO intensely short-sighted in that Trump will not protect her from the consequences of the choices she makes on his behalf. If she gets censured, loses her license, or ends up getting charged with crimes herself, he will simply drop her. Nor does she seem to be casting a lot of concern toward her post-Trump career options, either. All of that is stupid as hell, IMO.

But what's dumbest of all is the likelihood that she is simply getting paid in promises, agreeing to postpone some portion or all of her pay, with all the blind hubris that makes her believe she will be different from all the other attorneys and partners and contractors and workers he's stiffed throughout the decades. If that's true, it will certainly keep her a Trump favorite, until he stiffs and discards her just like all the rest. Kise got his $3M upfront; does anyone here think she did the same? I don't, lol.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

I don't think it's a "strategy" as much as "the only thing he knows". Remember, this guy has only made money in real estate. Everything else flopped. He has the strategy of a real estate salesman who tells you unverifiable things like "George Washington had dinner here" and "it will double in value".

It's going to backfire now because it gets boring. Why do you think everyone in NYC hates him?

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 8 months ago

when Rachael Maddow retires, it will be the end of an era. She is so good.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] Xepher@lemm.ee 38 points 8 months ago

“I can fake being smart."

Please start at any time.

[–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Donald Trump's attorney wants the public to know her good looks are more important than her intelligence, because she can "fake being smart."

What a horrible world we live in, if someone feels the need to live like that.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago

I don't know if that's just an unflattering picture, but she... just no. Her head is so small she looks like she has microencephalitis from that angle. But granting that it's probably just an unfortunate camera angle, she is still looking very mid. I wouldn't look twice at her.

[–] reflex@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but she’s very pretty.

And she has that Asus RoG laptop.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I have an ASUS ROG laptop. Are you saying I'm not pretty 😥

[–] Geek_King@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, you're Rico Suave, you're handsome 😉

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

😅😂🤣

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"Oh no, they're not taking me seriously!"

Cashes 2.5 million dollar check

"Anyways..."

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

With a performance like that, I'm not entirely convinced she was smart enough to get her payments upfront. We all know the famous low Valerian saying - "A Trump never pays his debts"

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I actually undershot, since the 2.5 must've been just from one PAC.

3.5: https://www.newsweek.com/alina-habbas-firm-has-been-paid-over-35m-defend-trump-1862002

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Where did the check come from?

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Trump's PACs, in turn funded by a bunch of people who are being told how they're funding his "campaign".

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He can't be found guilty and have it stick. He can blame his defense and ask for a retrial. Later. Almost immediately after the delayed verdict, but you know... later.

[–] Birdie@thelemmy.club 6 points 8 months ago

This isn't about being found guilty though, right? This is about determining damages. He might appeal how much he needs to pay, but he's already been found civilly liable.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Kaplan repeatedly interrupted Habba’s questions, including when she began to read from a document that had not been formally entered into evidence, sending the trial to a recess.

“During which you should refresh your memory about how it is you get a document into evidence," Kaplan told the lawyer.

God damn.

[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Habba

What is she doing? Doesn’t she have a racist hotel pool to run or something?

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pool's closed due to AIDS, unfortunately.

[–] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 1 points 8 months ago

Ha! I thought maybe I was reaching too far back 😂

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't even be surprised if Republicans try to vote for Trump even as he sits behind bars.

Can presidents pardon themselves to be released from prison?

[–] Gimpydude@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not clear, but if they can it's only for federal crimes. No state conviction can be overturned by the president.

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Correct, however, federal court supercedes state decisions.

He'd still be effectively, untouchable. The system wasn't designed to be abused and tested like this unfortunately.

[–] Gimpydude@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 8 months ago

I don't think so. There's nothing at the federal level that can override a state level conviction. In Georgia, not even the governor can pardon prisoners, that has to go before a board, and only after 5 years has been served.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I don't have that much faith that one in twelve New Yorkers isn't a MAGA moron.

[–] chairman@feddit.nl 1 points 8 months ago

Totally imagine this happening in the courtroom. https://youtu.be/gYzfTHO9tkY?si=4ePcDXWSah5mH-6D