this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
311 points (95.9% liked)

News

22772 readers
4225 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's Mickey, but not as you've ever seen him before.

A trailer for a slasher film, featuring a masked killer dressed as Mickey Mouse, was released on 1 January, the day that Disney's copyright on the earliest versions of the cartoon character expired in the US.

"We wanted the polar opposite of what exists," the movie's producer said.

A new Mickey-inspired horror game, showing the rodent covered with blood stains, also dropped on the same day.

Steamboat Willie, a 1928 short film featuring early non-speaking versions of Mickey and Minnie, entered the public domain in the US on New Year's Day.

It means cartoonists, novelists and filmmakers can now rework and use the earliest versions of Mickey and Minnie.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 61 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

This looks awful, like that Pooh movie. These "make a horror story out of expired copyrights" trend is gonna get old, fast.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 39 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I don't care if it gets old, fuck copyrights and fuck Disney.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Absolutely fuck Disney, but Disney got fucked (from their perspective) by copyright law, not this movie. Maybe you could say the movie thumbs its nose at Disney, but the "damage" has already been done because Steamboat Willie is already public domain. Now should be the time for people to look for interesting things to do with the material. Instead, we're getting whatever this is.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

What? They got 95 years of publicly-funded protection. How is that getting fucked?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No. I absolutely will not gatekeep artwork that is used from the public domain. I don't care. Even if I don't like it doesn't mean I will stoop to saying people should or shouldn't be making it. This comment reeks of elitism.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Elitism? Because I don't think people should be making shitty movies and shitty video games? If I'm elitist because I don't want endless movies that would make Ed Wood cringe, guilty.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Believing people should stop making content just because it's not your personal choice is cringe.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's absolutely not what I said.

[–] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Horror film fans want these kind of films.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do they? Or do they want horror films made with time and thought?

[–] bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 months ago

They want both and the market is large enough to support it.

I don't know if it still holds true, but something like 50% of the entire North American independent film market that gets produced each year is horror and christmas films made for about $1.5 million dollars. Each one will sell for about $4-6 million.

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I mean, most movies are shit so what did you expect?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People will look back on this era and say, "just because they could have doesn't mean they should have."

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just because Disney could lobby to make copyright law insanely long doesn't mean they should have. It wouldn't have been s big event if Disney didn't make it one.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I'm not talking about copyright law, and if you read a tiny bit further down, you would see that I talked multiple times about the problem with modern copyright law and Disney's part in it.

Shitty copyright law doesn't mean we have to have shitty movies and shitty video games.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

So is this just going to happen with every single character that goes into public domain? Someone just has to make a garbage horror movie about them?

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Yeah.

Just like how people are more likely to want to stay standing up after having to sit for 8 hours for work/school.

There's a social rubberbanding effect, just gotta get it out of our collective system so the tension is released, and then better content will come after that release.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

If it's the character thats the face of the organization that is the reason copyright law has been strengthened and enforced with iron rulings, then yes it damn well should happen. Disney is simply reaping what they sewed and they earend every last bit of it and more.

[–] Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Did you expect anything less?

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 31 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Fuck Disney, Fuck Copyright laws and all of that, but there has got to be something more interesting to do with Mickey than a schlocky horror movie with a budget of two paper clips and a pack of gum

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes. But those things take time and don't farm clicks.

[–] trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah they did this with Winnie the Pooh and afaik it wasn't great. I get the idea, but lacks creativity if "it's just opposite" is your draw card.

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

It was apparently profitable enough they are making a sequel

[–] Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Other people will do it. You think only 1 group is going to take advantage of this?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago

I'm glad you're going to watch it. Let us know how it is!

[–] Kyatto@leminal.space 25 points 8 months ago

If they really want to make a good movie with some decisive social commentary it should be about mickey enslaved by a "nameless" corporation (because of course everything else is copyrighted and trademarked still) and escaping. Would make an interesting thriller, there's a lot that could be done to criticize copyright and the companies that abuse the system and their labor force.

Someone make this please, the idea is free (and so is the character)

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's so edgy. At first you're like "Hey that's Mickey Mouse! I know him!" And then he's doing horrible things and you're like "wait a minute - Mickey Mouse wouldn't kill people!"

That's what makes it artistic.

[–] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 2 points 8 months ago

Really subverted my expectations

[–] heyfrancis@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago

Waiting for a Mickey V Winnie movie

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

i was expecting some rival studio to have an AI ready to just blast out new mickey episodes hourly.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

2020 - S05E03 - Mickey Mouse Horror Show

A trailer for a slasher film, featuring a masked killer dressed as Mickey Mouse, was released on 1 January, the day that Disney’s copyright on the earliest versions of the cartoon character expired in the US. A new Mickey-inspired horror game, showing the rodent covered with blood stains, also dropped on the same day. Steamboat Willie, a 1928 short film featuring early non-speaking versions of Mickey and Minnie, entered the public domain in the US on New Year’s Day. It means cartoonists, novelists and filmmakers can now rework and use the earliest versions of Mickey and Minnie. It’s Mickey, but not as you’ve ever seen him before. TV-MA, 47 mins

SD, SHD, UHD, Dolby Vision, Dolby Atmos, Dolby Surround

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That show only had one season though

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 1 points 8 months ago
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Hahaha this is what I was waiting for after the copyright ended