this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
489 points (95.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55085 readers
510 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seaturtle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 367 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Heh, more of this shit.

Remember, the only reason we can still watch the highly influential 1922 vampire movie Nosferatu today is because some people didn't destroy all their copies despite a court saying they had to.

DISOBEY DESTRUCTION ORDERS.

COPY ALL THE THINGS.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 69 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The author in question here was pretty shitty. He wrote his own sequel to called "Fellowship of the King", and then sued Amazon and the Tolkien estate saying they stole elements from his book. He lost, and the Tolkien estate countersued.

The guy played stupid games and won stupid prizes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Some older dutch movies were released as rentals to the theaters that had to be returned after they stopped playing the movie. These copies were all destroyed and re-releases on DVD now look worse than what it looked like in movie theatres.

The good news is that some theatres hung on to some movies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 275 points 1 year ago (30 children)

In my opinion LotR should've already entered the public domain but thanks to Disney well have to wait until 2044 for that.

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't have the already well-off children go without their steady income that they didn't have to work for...

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well how else are we supposed to encourage people to be related to people who develop intellectual property? It makes sense from a neponomic standpoint.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

Embracer is gonna be the next one to beg for an extension.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reasonable takes like this hurt daddy's profits... is u a domestic terrorist?

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It may as well be, they’re endorsing all sorts of shit content lately (like the Golem game, or the ring of power)

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, they'll manage to get it extended again before 2044.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] TheMongoose@kbin.social 175 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Should copyright for works that old be expired? Yes!

In the actual world we live in, was this guy ever going to avoid being sued so hard that his grandchildren will be embarrassed for him? No!

You've got to admire the lemming-like devotion to the legal cliff he threw himself off though. Writing a sequel to not only a copyright work, but one that is still in the cultural zeitgeist thanks to a 20-year old wildly successful series of films? Ballsy. Subsequently suing one of the largest companies in the world and the estate that produced the original works as infringing his copyright?

Chutzpa, I believe the term is.

[–] BustlingChungus@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

20 year old films? I didn’t realise someone had made the movies before Peter Jackson…

checks date of release

…fuck

[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They did make an animation before Peter Jackson's release and I'm too afraid to look at that date

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Yeah, this guy didn’t have a leg to stand on. There’s an independently owned cafe opposite sarhole mill (inspiration for “the shire”) on the street JRR Tolkien grew up on called “the hungry hobbit”. It’s been called that since 2005 - before the release of the hobbit film. A production company sued this tiny sandwich shop, sitting on a roundabout 3 miles south of Birmingham for the unauthorised use of the word “hobbit”. That was completely egregious imo. It’s now called “the hungry hobb” - they just took down the last two letters on the sign. I really should grab a sandwich from them one day.

[–] BaardFigur@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hobbit was a word way before J.R.R. wrote his books, stupid that they were able to sue them

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ballsy? He's an outright copyright troll and anyone celebrating him here in the comments should read the article...

He wrote a knockoff book and then tried to claim Tolkien's characters as his own and sue his estate? Does nobody remember the days of BS software patent trolls trying to claim they invented "the app" or "method for clicking on things with the mouse cursor?" Do we remember how mad we were at those shysters?

This guy deserves whatever he gets.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 124 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Look, I agree his works shouldn't be destroyed, just not monetizable.

But the dude poked a bear with a sharp stick... Suing the creators of the story/characters you've built your content on for copyright infringement? Brilliant move....

[–] ANIMATEK@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Right? Like I’d go write Harry Potter 8 and then sue WB lol that guy is nuts.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 year ago (29 children)

Copyright's explicit purpose is to encourage new works.

Any form of "unpublishing" is theft from the public. You wanna say a guy can't make money on a thing? Great, fine, go nuts. But nothing any human being put effort into deserves to be lost forever.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Going after the copyright holder for infringing on your work, which by merely existing commercially infringes on their copyright, is one hell of a way to get sued out the arse...

Having said that, it is a crime that LOTR still hasn't entered the public domain yet.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I'm not sure what this idiot thought would happen...

[–] anewbeginning@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The author then filed suit against both Amazon and the Tolkien estate, claiming the streaming series “The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” had borrowed from his sequel and infringed his copyright.

The gall.

[–] sheepishly@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

I honestly wouldn't even be surprised. What was it, that thing with Star Trek Discovery taking plot points from some adventure game with space-faring tardigrades?

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Tolkien Estate? What's that? People profiting off of the work of an author who has been dead for 50 years?

Copyright law is fucked up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

This guy was just deluded to think he was in the right or could win.

[–] Karlos_Cantana@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was going to write a Star Wars sequel and then sue Disney for copyright infringement, until I heard this story.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What was this guy thinking? He was clearly violating copyright.

Is he just soft in the head, or is he up to something us not crazy people can't see?

[–] ConstableJelly@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

First two books in the series were "Fellowship of the King" and "The Two Trees" so...I'm not entirely convinced they were even very original stories...

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So the third must be "Return of the Ring."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheLastHero@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Demetrious Polychron

holy shit what an incredible name, don't even care what's this about, I'm with him. President Polychron 2024.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] booty@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Abolish copyright law, it does nothing but stymie creativity

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He tried to take them to court?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While this is piracy adjacent, good on Amazon and Tolkien's estate for shutting down that trash lol

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 42 points 1 year ago (10 children)

lol, Amazon's LOTR was trash.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't even like Tolkien (find his writing to be just excessive, I don't need to know the color of the buttons on the shirt of the dead character with no name), and even I have to agree, lol.

Too many re-interpretations of authors' works. Tolkien is highly detailed - not reflecting that (or worse, substituting your own details) in a movie or show is just hubris. If you're so damn good why don't you write your own shit. Oh, your name doesn't sell instantly is why.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

We've seen this with the Witcher, we've seen it with GoT, we've seen it with LOTR: super artistic production teams which have their heads so deep up their own arses and are entrenched so deeply inside that weird removed-from-reality Hollywood bubble that they legitimately think they know better how to interpret the lore some world renowned author made than the author himself. Always ends in mediocre showsand hilarious interviews with said production teams where

a) everybody is wrong but them
b) bUt OuR vIsIoN

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] n3m37h@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Amazon should be sued for the Rings of Power

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KinNectar@kbin.run 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

More to the point, who's got a link so we can judge this fanfic for ourselves?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›