this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
72 points (86.0% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

If a headline is phrased as a question, i.e. "Will X takeover the world this month?", then the answer is always no, because if the answer was yes they would have written "X will takeover the world by the end of the month" which is a much more declarative and attention grabbing headline.

Similarly, if a headline says something "could do X" that means it won't because if it was going to the reporter would have written that it "will do X".

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Described well. Link to the relevant wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Headline: Studies show French toast may cause cancer.

Then again, it may not.

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why are you picking on the French? If I had my guess, I would assume Texas toast would be worse in that regard. Lol

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago

All toast matters

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Since it contains burnt byproducts, it probably does. Like 0.001% more chance of cancer per toast per hour or something.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 11 months ago

It won't ever be your cell phone screen. Optically, it's less clear than what we have, and while the wood/epoxy is "tough", wood is not "hard". It will scratch easily.

[–] Introversion@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It’s an interesting line of research, but unless they can completely remove all visual traces of grain, etc, so that it’s very clear, it’s not going to be a replacement for glass in either screens or windows. And I’m skeptical that’s possible.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I've got a couple frosted windows that I'd love to be as insulating as wood, I can see it maybe being used for that.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

It would also be useful for blinds. My doggie is a bit of a little jerk and wrecked mine trying to look outside while they were closed. Wood blinds would likely be a lot more resilient

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'd take a woody window to replace the clear glass overlooking the scenic parking lot outside literally any of the apartments I've ever lived in.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

If it's anything like NileRed's "transparent wood" it won't work for shit as a window, except as like a privacy window that just lets light through.

[–] aev@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] kambusha@feddit.ch 23 points 11 months ago

Could. Should. Wood.

[–] Beelzebob@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

An iPhone user will still break it.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wood is wood and wood breaks.

Not bad.