If the bank robber is able to break into the bank on his second attempt, he should not be held accountable for his first attempt. Solid logic. Sure.
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
139 points (97.3% liked)
News
23295 readers
5390 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I’d rather we set the precedent of holding people accountable for their crimes.
Sadow said that if Trump wins the election, he would seek to postpone the trial until after he left office, arguing that it would interfere with his responsibilities as president.
What responsibilities? His golf schedule?
Now that's not fair. He also has a lot of Fox News to watch.
And he needs time to rant and rave on TruthSocial.
Same people who swore that going after President Clinton while he was in office wouldn't be a distraction are now arguing the reverse. What could have made them change their minds???
What could have made them change their minds???
Dementia?
/s
~~/s~~
:)
We already know running for president is not a protection.
Anyone who is confused by that needs to look at 1988 and Lyndon Larouche.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaRouche_criminal_trials
He had a grand jury indictment, arrest, and trial while he was running for President, the conviction hitting one month after the election.
If the argument is "well, you can't be tried while campaigning" that would block perennial candidates, who are ALWAYS running, would never fall under prosecution.
Having a convenient way to shield people from prosecution is one of their goals.
LOL! Not only is he going to trial in Georgia, he’s going to be convicted and sentenced without chance of pardon by another POTUS. He’s going to rot there until he dies.
I admire your optimism.
I don't really know, but I get the worrying sense that the courts don't realize what a big deal this is.
Cancel any other cases for any Trump-involved judge. Have 24/7 military grade protection for all court staff and everyone's families. Have the NSA involved in tracking down every single person who makes every single threat to the safety of anybody, and prosecute them. The alternative is that the collapse-of-democracy-o-meter ticks one small mark closer to 100. I'm not trying to be all panicky about it but the country has essentially bottomless resources to deal with Trump's cases with the gravity and urgency that they demand, but they're being assigned this priority alongside 1,000 "business as usual" things. This isn't a normal case with normal consequences. Make it a priority.
give him his presidential campaign immunity. And then Biden can just murder him. Or hell let Bernie do it, he's got 8 years he can postpone the trial for.
I watched some of this, and that guy is a simpleton. He wasn't comprehending what the issue at hand was, and McAfee seemed tired of hearing it after a point.
The guy tried to overthrow democracy. If he gets re-elected, this is the least to worry about.