this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
801 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 106 points 9 months ago (13 children)

Every once in a while, Romney will stand up and do the bare minimum.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

swoons in Mormon

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 11 points 9 months ago

True but it’s almost always too late to matter though..

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 83 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think people get that this difference makes a difference. As a millennial going through college during the GW Bush years, there was at least a Republican party that cared about America, cared about non political government institutions and the service those members participate in, etc. Since the tea party that shit changed. And I don't think it's hard to believe Mitt Romney actually cares about this country and means what he says on this thing. I feel disgusted defending Romney, but I kind of miss it when it was guys like Romney were the political opponents in power and not these MAGA folks hellbent on destroying democracy and politicizing the institutions critical to America.

[–] crashfrog@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I mean, I was going through college when GW Bush was elected, and here's what I remember:

  1. Everyone lying about GW Bush being the "first Spanish-speaking President" (he spoke no Spanish at all), the first of many lies meant to cover up his manifest incompetence and intellectual incapability

  2. Republicans shutting the government down for weeks at a time

  3. A maniac, entirely fictitious scandal invented solely to hamper Al Gore's election prospects (the White House phones scandal)

What was different about that day's Republican Party than today's? We knew less about it, was all.

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The thing that I dont think a lot of people like to recognize is that GW Bush had both some of the highest and lowest approval ratings. For months immediately after his approval rating was like 90 percent. Dems are also responsible for going to war then, even if they weren't the party in control.

But the thing is republicans did hold institutions, agencies, and administrative government orgs in higher esteem and weren't trying to destroy and purge. That's very different than trump. There's a difference between Mitt Romneys of the. GOP and the Jim Jordans who have never passed their own legislation and instead only focus on dismantling government and going on witch hunts.

I think the other thing you need to look at is how other elected officials speak about working with him. There's what you say in the public light, and then there's the work that actually gets done.

Also, didn't Romney kind of quietly champion universal healthcare in MA? And despite his own views, accept state Supreme Court rulings to provide gay marriage licenses? This guy actually cared about governing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Also 2 unnecessary wars. Iraq causing the US to lose focus in Afghanistan. Republicans steered the Medicare part D BS and Bush signed it. The economy melting down then they blamed Obama. Then they questioned Obama’s citizenship. Before that was Reagan racking up debt, and raising taxes all while “states rights” was used as cover for institutional racism.

Republicans have always been dog shit.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but they never would have sold us out completely to China or Russia. Their goals were power and grift, but they weren't willing to destroy the country to do so.

As bad as they were, Trump is likely worse.

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

It's a progression, though. They turned up the heat slowly so people wouldn't notice how they're being boiled alive. Romney isn't a Tea Party/MAGAt like the rest, but he had no problem catering to them during his 2012 bid for the Presidency and he was part of the establishment that paved the way for the extremists. He can afford to distance himself now that he's retiring, but he didn't listen when we warned about the rise of extremism in his party. It's too late to earn our respect for acknowledging it now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Yup those fucking hanging ballots could have given Algore in Florida. In general the world would be better

[–] Blackout@kbin.social 70 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"But not Biden so probably Trump but I will have my fingers crossed when I be a hypocrite and Jebus will forgive me." - Rich white guy

[–] DriftingDeep@lemm.ee 49 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But… he voted for Biden.

[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This thread is the epitome of low information D voters parroting the R=bad line. Romney was one of that last reasonable republicans left.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah…. His usual ethical-adjacent stance. He won’t support the awful but the moderately better are just fine. The pinnacle of GOP integrity is still pathetic.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don't know. Is DeSantis moderately better?

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 21 points 9 months ago (24 children)

If you’re fine with whitewashing and gay bashing, sure.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Lol moderately? He's basically the villian in It Can't Happen Here

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 34 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's genuinely surprising how low the bar is for a Republican to be considered ethical - refusing to vote in the guy who literally tried to pull a coup on your country shouldn't even be an ethical stance, it should be the stance of literally everyone

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

But... But... Trans people

Seriously tho G W Bush ran on Gays are getting married oh no! And rode that to state and local wins even before 9/11 happened

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 31 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sounds vaguely like an ethical stance, except DeSantis is still ok for him.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (6 children)

It's implied. Sounds tacky to list 3 people in that statement

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The arc of Mitt Romney's universe is long and flexes back and forth, but it bends towards sanity

[–] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spider@lemmy.nz 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Sen. Mitt Romney Says He Would Vote For 'Virtually' Anybody Other Than Trump or Ramaswamy

Remember, politicians are often masters at parsing their words; there's a big difference between "would" and "will".

Edit: Also remember Romney was a chronic flip-flopper; don't expect that to change.

[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 18 points 9 months ago

Romney will not vote for Trump under any circumstances and isn’t shy about it*

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Romney isn't a politician anymore. That's why I think this carries more weight. He can say what he wants and doesn't have to worry about job security of appealing to the base.

Also, read the article. This is about the Republican primary. He can vote for folks near term still R. But he alluded to that in a general if it's trump, he'd probably vote Biden.

But "the others that are running are acceptable to me and I'd be happy to vote for them," Romney told "Person to Person's" Norah O'Donnell when asked which candidates he "liked" in the GOP field.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

$100 he still votes trump in the end.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 18 points 9 months ago

What odds are you giving? Because honestly I'd take that bet. Mitt fucking despises Trump.

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Id bet against you. You think a retired politician would publicly go against his old party but privately do the opposite? Also, this article is mostly about the GOP primary. Read the article, not just the headline.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (5 children)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He is an anything goes martial artist that, due to the curse of the drowned maiden, transforms into a teenage girl when exposed to cold water.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Never seen the show, but is this a Ranma reference?

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Not who you replied to, but im just gonna say yes.

“Yes.”

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The most annoying guy at the Republican debates that no one is watching. He’s 5% in the GOP polls and is basically the adult version of the insufferable kid that got way too into high school debate team.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fucking asshole helped create this problem. Fuck Romney. Fuck every traitor republican.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True, but I still think it's good to see a little bit of reason coming back here and there. I welcome it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

is there a virtual person he would vote for

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

that spanish AI model maybe?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seraph@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Mitt looks like the villain in an 80s comedy movie and feels like a guy who says what people tell him to say.

IMHO this is just telling people the Mormon church doesn't support those guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

"Virtually* as in not literally because he will actually vote for any religious fascist bullshit for real...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But he would vote for DeSatan?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ooboontoo@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

You and me both buddy, now do everything you can to convince the fleeting numbers of sane folks in your party to do the same.

load more comments
view more: next ›