this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
948 points (100.0% liked)

196

16500 readers
2877 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 102 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Drink verification can now.

[–] snor10@lemm.ee 22 points 11 months ago
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If this shit ever becomes reality I'm commiting corporate terrorism in Noita

[–] Vuraniute@thelemmy.club 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Make Johny Silverhand proud

[–] Uncle_Sheo217@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Silverhand was a goddamn hero

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago

At the point ad-blockers are regarded as terrorism and gay sex is a capital crime, there's no reason not to play with explosives or enrich uranium.

In for a penny, in for a kilo of cobalt.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

great now my top post on lemmy so far is about piss

[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Could've done even better if you had made your post about not pissing for three days.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

i feel like this is oddly specific

[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Have you forgotten the classic "no poop for 3 days" post? It pretty much took over Lemmy for like a week.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago

i am... thankful i missed that discourse o.O

[–] Toes@ani.social 7 points 11 months ago

Could be worse princess

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago

It only goes downhill from here

[–] Speiser0@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

Well, maybe the people on lemmy just like piss that much.

Btw., my 2nd most popular comment is me promoting death wishes.

[–] FirstMajesticComet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Terms of service were meant to be broken, they are a once-sided agreement that the other party never needs to uphold, there are no consequences for them if they don't. So I say the moment they try to screw you over give them a good punch in the face, there are some nasty ways to do that to online entities, some illegal, others just petty, some in grey areas (in real free countries none of them are illegal, because corporations aren't protected in places like that).

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Please show me the ways

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Watching the ad instead of clicking constitutes a violation of the terms of service

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Watching the terms of service instead of clicking constitutes a violation of the ad.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Literally black mirror lol

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's Sony that has a patent on a TV that uses a camera and microphone so they can play ads that only stop when you stand up, raise your arms and shout "McDonalds!", for example. Not in Black Mirror, in real life.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They do, but we have to remember that big companies like that file patents all the time for concepts they never actually use. Apple is famous for it.

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It's true, it's even possible they're sitting on it so nobody else can do it. But at the same time I feel like if they felt they could get away with it they'd do it. It's closer to reality than we'd like to think.

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

for concepts they never actually use.

... yet.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I mean you could say that about any of these patents too: https://gizmodo.com/apple-patents-iphone-mac-watch-windowless-car-vr-socks-1848951448

But the chances that any of them will be implemented are very slim.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not familiar with black mirror. Is this literally in the literal sense of the word by definition or literally in the oxymoronic figurative sense?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As in that's somewhat happening in an episode of the series where ads are being forced onto the main character, and it paused when the MC close his eye because he didn't want to watch it.

[–] pseudonym@monyet.cc 1 points 11 months ago

Literally literal

[–] quantenzitrone@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

1984 as well, at least in some aspects

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

This is why I don't give applications access to my webcam or microphone unless it's an application designed for video calls (ex. Zoom).

[–] pseudonym@monyet.cc 3 points 11 months ago

Oh my God that's horrifying

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Foot the bill directly

Too real. Facebook is currently attempting this "feature" in the EU

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Am I the only one perfectly fine with that option?

Like...shit costs money. Somebody has to pay for it. Ultimately it's going to be advertisers, creators, or users. A company can't be comelled to offer a service at a loss without compensation indefinitely.

The big change I want to see is for payment to remove not only ads, but tracking as well.

I already pay not to have ads. I'll pay extra if it means they don't collect my data.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The concept that the internet doesn't cost money harkens back to the days when the only people who were hosting content were community driven enthusiasts. The fact that "shit costs money" is even an argument here is a symptom of the greater problem that corporatism has invaded a community space for profit.

I guess you can argue that corporatism has made the internet more accessible, to a degree. Really corporatism has only increased the exposure of a handful of social media sites. But that doesn't really change what their goal is, which is to squeeze money out of people trying to socialize.

Now that they have invaded what was once a space for enthusiasts and tech minds, made it into a people trap and scape money off the backend with metadata, the idea that they're now asking people directly for money that they can no longer make due to their government protecting them is grotesque and an absurd direction for services like these to go in.

Don't pretend like Facebook, youtube, et al don't make enough money hand over foot to just to cover their operating costs already. They're asking for money for profit. Billion dollar companies are now asking directly for profit because they can't extort a newly formed protection.

I suppose selling a better experience is one thing. There's legitimacy in that. Although selling a reprieve from a bad experience that you created (youtube) is a bit like creating a problem to sell the solution, which is still fucked.

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For some of us with smaller bladders it can be a problem. Installing the https://runpee.com/ app has been a game changer going to the movies. Tells you the best times to go pee and not miss anything.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Last time I tried to download that they wanted me to purchase a subscription service

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I'd PaaS on that offer, smells suspicious.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I just love the pause button, but then while I enjoyed collective effervescence as a young boy watching Star Wars I get spooked by culty-acting crowds as an old man.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 11 months ago

This old blog bit of mine might be relevant. TLDR: The owner / executive class is always on the market for stupid cruel ways to enhance revenues, increase productivity or just seize more control of workers and customers, even when these schemes have the opposite effect. And when they are implemented, we'll find ways to hack, circumvent or exploit the new paradigm.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

nice edit.

but i can't call "the onion" a satire/humor these days anymore.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Me: Nuh uh man! Not me! I'm never gonna use youtube ever again!

Youtube Ad-marshall: BRAIN-STAPLE THEM!

[–] rivalfloatmount@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

we don't like nazis here