Firefox users who never left: feeling of smugness intensifies
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
571 points (97.3% liked)
Technology
58108 readers
4829 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I try not to express or show it though. Only good vibes to bring everyone over to Firefox.
signature look of superiority
I must admit I ditched Firefox for a while when it was considerably slower than Chrome.
feelsbadman.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
What a great selling point for Firefox.
WE BLOCK ADS!
Never looked into using firefox but the enshitification has forced me to do so.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Google Chrome can suck a dick.
Damn, that sounds like a killer feature.
Yeah, but given the name, I bet Edge does it way better ;)
load more comments
(2 replies)
If only there was an alternative. Some kinda fox. A fox that was set aflame
load more comments
(30 replies)
To abuse a saying...
Best time to be on Firefox? Yesterday.
Second best? Today.
Free ad for Firefox. Funny enough can't be blocked by ad blockers.
How long until Google starts paying sites to require chrome? The already tried rolling that concept out a few months ago. They only stopped because of the backlash that was publicly associated with it. They already pay major phone manufacturers to have google as their default or only search option.
So who's going to stop them when we start finding that major popular sites suddenly don't work on firefox?
Hopefully the EU
People could start configuring their sites to ban Google Chrome. Give a scary message that says something like "Google Chrome is not allowed on this site for your protection. Google Chrome has severe vulnerabilities that allow for easy infection. An autistic teenager was falsely convicted of selling CP after being infected and now must register for life."
People would switch away from Google Chrome incredibly fast if website owners started posting that.
I like the way you think, but that sounds like a lawsuit with one of the richest companies on the planet behind the prosecution. Could work for sites based outside of US jurisdiction.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(10 replies)
This, but computer literacy rather than literal literacy 
title as it should be: 'google did not die a hero, it instead lived long enough to become the villain.'
such old news though
google became the villain the moment it decided to become publicly traded and chose to be the internet's ad pimp rather than a search engine
most of us are too young to remember but there was a time when you could search for something obscure and actually find it
load more comments
(4 replies)
They're going to burn their own browser. If they stop allowing adblockers, a lot of people are just going to change browsers.
good, and good riddance too
load more comments
(2 replies)
People keep saying (and corpos keep believing) that normies will just "get used to the ads or pay a premium"
But everybody has a breaking point. People who already dislike it have left chrome or are in the rush to leave. Once people reach this point, they will start asking their more tech savvy friends or the Internet for a better way.
I honestly hope Google will not change its trajectory because sooner or later, people will get fed up with their bullshit.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Hi Firefox. It's been a while..
It shouldn't have been a while
When making billions isn't enough there is something wrong with you
Everything Google does is evil. How are people still using anything they make—or control the repo for (chromium, android)
At least Android actually gives you freedom. What other alternatives (that actually work) are there? I'd rather have a phone with an OS made by an evil corp that I can actually control, than an OS that doesn't even let me install apps not approved by the manufacturer.
load more comments
(9 replies)
They make fantastic services that are far more functional than their oss competitors and it's far far less effort than hosting and dealing with that bullshit.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(15 replies)
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A year later, Google is restarting the phase-out schedule, and while it has changed some things, Chrome will eventually be home to inferior filtering extensions.
Google's blog post says the plan to kill Manifest V2, the current format for Chrome extensions, is back on starting June 2024.
The company says: "We expect it will take at least a month to observe and stabilize the changes in pre-stable before expanding the rollout to stable channel Chrome, where it will also gradually roll out over time.
On the high end now for me, Slack is drinking 500MB, while a single Google Chat tab, created by this company that is so concerned about performance, is at 1.5GB of memory usage.
Google is adding a completely arbitrary limit on how many "rules" content filtering add-ons can include, which are needed to keep up with the nearly infinite ad-serving sites that are out there (by the way, Ars Technica subscriptions give you an ad-free reading experience and make a great holiday gift!).
Mozilla's blog post on the subject promises "Firefox’s implementation of Manifest V3 ensures users can access the most effective privacy tools available like uBlock Origin and other content-blocking and privacy-preserving extensions."
The original article contains 714 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Google Chrome will limit your digital rights starting June 2024
Wait, not "starting," my bad.
view more: next ›