this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1129 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"with wind the single-biggest contributor.... Power production costs have declined “by almost half” .... And the clean energy sector has created 50,000 new jobs.... Ask me what was the impact on the electricity sector in Uruguay after this tragic war in Europe — zero."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 221 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I actually never thought of it like that, if you're not partaking in the trade of fossil fuels, you are removing yourself from a lot of potential conflicts and "who support who" ordeals.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One of the main reasons the big players want (or even need) as many people globally to remain dependent on it as possible - control.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That and petrolheads in politics. Who is so slow in renewables? USA and Germany.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Carter tried to show the US the future but then he got replaced with Bad Human 1.0 Ronnie and it was all trashed.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Germany has the most renewables per capita of any European nation and have been heavy investors for a long time now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, I think that one of the side effect of the war in Ukraine will be a big increase of renewables energy in Europe.

European countries started to realize how fragile their energy supply is and how dangerous it is.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sadly, in the meantime it also mean a surge of imports of fossil fuels from other countries and reopening extraction sites in EU. Reducing fossil fuel dependency really is the top priority of EU, not only for ecology but also for peace and for the economy.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wait until we have our first Wind War.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's what we call it after eating beans all day

[–] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago

We call it Aladdin's revenge. Turning the blanket into a flying carpet and all that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...Except China, where most renewables are produced.

[–] Hoagie@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Except once you have the turbines and panels, you don't have to keep importing resources to run them. Sure, you might need parts for maintenance, but if things go south it's a lot easier to reverse engineer parts than to find new oil suppliers.

[–] AAA@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Only because they produce them the cheapest and in the largest quantities (which goes hand in hand).

Basically any country can produce solar panels and wind turbines. Both technology and resource wise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CleanDefinition@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (7 children)

We've been at ~95% renewable for years actually, but now we've reached 100%

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Looks like that's just the grid? I'm sure there's more to go for transportation and eliminating the need for generators and gas, but this is a great start!

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

does anyone ever assume that it's anything other than the grid when it comes to some article like this?

[–] Lancoian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

electricity is't the majority of the energy consumed in nearly any country.

it's a easy way to keep confusing less vigilant people by calling electricity as energy.

Just call things the way they are.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're right; 75% to 80% of worldwide energy is actually waste heat.

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but electrifying a process doesn't automatically make it not produce waste heat, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 1 year ago

Electrically independent doesn't have the same ring to it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostlight@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Meanwhile in South Africa, we're having blackouts while being almost completely dependant on coal.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I remembered reading many years ago about large solar plants in SA and I wondered what happened to that. Apparently Zuma happened: From a world leader in renewables, to years behind, thanks to Zuma and his cronies.

https://martinplaut.com/2022/07/14/how-zuma-and-his-cronies-destroyed-plans-for-south-africas-renewable-energy-revolution/

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I bet the companies make a lot of profit on that, so all good \s

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yep they kick back to the politicians so perfectly to plan

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You know you need a lot of sun and wind for renewable energy?

Pretty sure South Africa has too little of it unlike those sunny and wind torn countries like, don't know... Germany?

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Plus coal is more expensive power.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 32 points 1 year ago

Well done Uruguay.

[–] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago (18 children)

I wonder how much of that is biomass, and how they're planning to grow enough vegetation to renew iy

[–] Tibert@jlai.lu 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

https://app.electricitymaps.com/zone/UY

You can select 30d, year... And see how much was used for that period.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not too much biomass fortunately. But even with some googling I can't seem to find how anyone plans to produce enough biomass to keep this going

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This aspect is a big aspect of intermittent renewables energy that is often dismissed: you need piloted energy as a backup, the amount of piloted energy depend on how oversized is the intermittent energy installation.

For renewable piloted energy there is two options that I know of: hydro and biomass. Uruguay is using both.

It's something to keep in mind if we want to reach 100% renewables without nuclear, we need to increase the biomass electricity production.

On another hand we are already using a lot of biomass to produce ethanol and biodiesel. A lot of land is also use for animal feed, so I'm a society with less ICE cars and less meat eated we might have enough land to grow biomass for electricity generation.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

53,000 barrels/day

It looks like Uruguays oil consumption has flatlined since about 2014. I can't find any newer data than 2016 but here's my source:

https://www.worldometers.info/oil/uruguay-oil/

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Presumably mostly for transportation sector. EV adoption should lower that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

i think evs are still too expensive for the common uruguaian(?) wallet. so they still use oil for cars. but 4 months 100% renewables is great news.

load more comments
view more: next ›