this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1129 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
3263 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"with wind the single-biggest contributor.... Power production costs have declined “by almost half” .... And the clean energy sector has created 50,000 new jobs.... Ask me what was the impact on the electricity sector in Uruguay after this tragic war in Europe — zero."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

does anyone ever assume that it's anything other than the grid when it comes to some article like this?

[–] Lancoian@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

electricity is't the majority of the energy consumed in nearly any country.

it's a easy way to keep confusing less vigilant people by calling electricity as energy.

Just call things the way they are.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're right; 75% to 80% of worldwide energy is actually waste heat.

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but electrifying a process doesn't automatically make it not produce waste heat, right?

[–] thesorehead@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reference to waste heat could include the heat from burning fossil fuels that isn't turned directly into work. Which is a lot.

So you're right, there will still be some waste heat and the reduction in production needs won't be that drastic. But it's still a significant chunk of the total!

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Converting energy to power will always produce at least one of heat or light (also radiant heat) in the process.

There is no 100% efficient power.

But, electric is the closest you could get. Especially compared to any petroleum products

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Changing your energy generation from burning something to turning a turbine with wind power, hydropower or geothermal power. Or just using solar, means that you have no waste heat for electrical generation.

Waste heat is only created when you burn a fuel to boil the water.

[–] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you heat things electrically you still generate waste heat. Think electrical stove and its bigger industrial counterparts.

[–] Lancoian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

that's not quite right and mixes couple things

you have production losses and transmission losses. then you have waste heat used for household and industrial heating.

now you would also have to produce that portion electrically.

For instance in winter heating requirements of a typical house are 2x that of the electricity used.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 1 year ago

Electrically independent doesn't have the same ring to it

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean I doubt any reasonable person would think that literally every household in Uruguay has replaced their gas stove with an electric/induction stove and that they use only AC/heat pumps and everyone has switched to an electric car and every bus has been converted to a trolley and or Battery/Hydrogen Electric

and a bunch of other stuff.