this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
136 points (95.3% liked)

News

23262 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Up until recently, most Americans benefited from a few government-supplied safety nets, most notably the large injection of stimulus money, which left many households sitting on a stockpile of cash that enabled some cardholders to keep their credit card balances in check.

But that cash reserve is largely gone after consumers gradually spent down their excess savings from the Covid-19 pandemic years.

It is absolutely insane to me that anyone thinks the stimulus money left households sitting on a stockpile of cash.

As though millions of people on the edge of poverty sat like dragons upon a mountain of wealth.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seriously, they don't even have a grasp on how little that money was even worth. That shit evaporated the instant it arrived just to pay off some of the interest on existing debt.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Exactly. That shit was a months rent. Anyone still talking about it is just stirring up bs

[–] Zink@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago

There are a lot of people conditioned to see the little guy getting money as some kind of affront to freedom. Most of them are the little guy as well, unfortunately.

[–] azn03@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

Lol. The PPP loans is where all the money disappeared to. Yes people got some money but it was spent for necessities, and to be honest it wasn't even that much. Some business got hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars that the government is still trying to recover which they probably never will.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's the wild part. We got like two or three checks of $1200, 800, and like $400 or something similar. Less than $2500. That's not a stockpile. A stockpile would be if we all had an extra $20-40k just sitting and no debt.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

It's the people who got laid off or partially laid off that got a good deal. The 600/week unemployment was a lot if money for people, especially if you still were getting most of a paycheck.

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I knew some bank folks. From what I heard, large amounts of the PPP loan money sat in the bank because some banks had trouble giving the money out. That extra money earned the banks a hefty amount of interest, and the C-suites of the bank made-off with a huge chunk of year-end bonus as a result. So while it isn't directly the PPP loan money, the bankers made a lot of money off of it.

The PPP loans that they were able to give out went to some small businesses and a large percentage of that money were forgiven. But some small businesses also had some trouble getting their loans forgiven due to either bad documentation / application / or the bank that gave them the loan did a poor job of filing the paperwork. So some of those businesses were stuck with a loan that they had to pay back or is waiting for it to be properly processed.

And of course there are a lot of fraud, too.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Companies continue to raise prices to unheard of levels to keep raking in obscene profits. They brag about it on their earnings calls.

Inflation isn’t the problem. Corporate greed is. Yet again.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Greed was always there. Such a constant does not explain why now prices are rising.

[–] bitsplease@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Because when supply chains got fucked up during COVID, they raised their prices for legitimate reasons, and found to their delight that people kept on buying, and In fact, because people were panic shopping, and stuck at home bored, they actually bought more.

So when things calmed down, instead of lowering prices, they continued to rise. because if they didn't, they'd be making less profit than last quarter (which is unacceptable)

Combine that with the wage stagnation that's been going on for decades and a housing shortage and you now have an economy where people can't afford rent, food, or basic goods

It’s greed plus tacit coordination. If all the companies in an industry raise prices at the same time, and almost none of them defect by unilaterally lowering prices, then they can all increase prices together. One theory is that markets are too concentrated now so tacit coordination during inflationary periods are easier.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They noticed that everybody else was rising the prices and that they can get away with it.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 11 months ago

When you get fit everyone a board room table, you don't have competition. You have an oligopoly. At the highest level of these companies, everyone knows everyone. They all go to the same events, people have moved around between the companies, and they all run in the same social circles.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What I really need right now is yet another article explaining to me how I'm actually better off now than I was a year or two ago, I'm just too stupid or whatever to realize it. Inflation was kicking our ass, and then we had two separate student loans kick in at once, on top of taking on a shitton of debt to take care of some of the broke boomers in our lives.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 11 months ago

Have you tried any of the following:

  • Stop buying avocado toast
  • Pull yourself up by your bootstrap
  • Not being poor

/s

[–] protist@mander.xyz -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

on top of taking on a shitton of debt to take care of some of the broke boomers in our lives

You might consider making some different choices

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Well, it's that or let people who never shared in the spoils of that generation's fabulous wealth go homeless, so, in a word: no.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe those broke boomers should have planned for the future.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they're not the stereotypical rich fuckhead boomer and you should show a little compassion or class solidarity.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Such hostility. You sound like a rich fuckhead who should work on some compassion or class solidarity.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you think it reads better with hostility, that's your business. My suggested tone for reading it is concern. Unsurprised disappointment also works.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

20% inflation since the start of the pandemic (higher on necessities like food and shelter), stagnant wages, massive wealth concentration and transfer from the poor and middle class to the rich… not surprising at all. Between wealth inequality, climate change, and political unrest, we are heading towards major societal collapse.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Makes me wonder how people are managing it.

I get paid every 2 weeks and I go through and pay down or pay off all my cards every payday.

When I put them back in my wallet, I put the paid off cards in first, and the not paid off cards upside down so I don't unintentionally add more debt to them.

As of last Friday, I have two cards that are not fully paid off. One with a 0% loan on a large electrical project, the 0% deal expires in April, but I expect to pay it off in January.

The other has a brand new $1,000 debt because I just paid my Christmas lights install company.

[–] ironeagl@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You went into debt on a credit card so you could pay someone else to install Christmas lights?

[–] tuxtey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What a world, don't tell my wife.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just Christmas lights, they're cleaning the gutters too, and taking the lights down after the holidays.

Just over $1,000.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jesus. That is an insane amount of money for that unless you live in a 5000+ sf. house.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Part of the penalty of not being able to do it myself. :( If we had a moss problem, they would treat that too, but the roof is only a year old. :)

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you get a few quotes? The gutter cleaners near me charge less than $300 and I have a two story house. It's close to upper $100s if only one story. Shop around and save yourself the coin unless that's not an issue for you.

I imagine hanging lights shouldn't be that expensive unless it's the first time and they are installing light hooks to be reusable each year.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, it wasn't this bad when we started using them 2 years ago, but inflation is hitting everything.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really aren't the average person if you can pay $1000 to have your Christmas lights installed. I'm trying to even envision the Christmas light situation at your house that could possibly cost that much to put up. It must be impressive.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's some custom work done because we have this awesome round window that's hard to work with.

This was last year:

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

tl;dr: increased credit card usage