far more maddeningly, some sites tell me that my username and password combo are incorrect when I’m using a VPN
Privacy
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
At least they got that far.
There’s a good reason as a web server to block anonymizing VPNs. Turns out the bad guys use them too. Who knew.
That's an inherent problem with shared connections.
The thing with sites telling you that your login is incorrect is also sometimes intentional, so people trying to brute-force logins won't realize they're getting blocked or just that their attempt was incorrect.
And yes, the only possibility is to try a different server that hasn't been abused, or run your own.
This is what 2FA is for
The real solution is to avoid these sites when possible
But this practice tells you what we all needed to know... They won't serve u unless they can track you.
Vote with us feet cattle
This is extra maddening with my banking app recently. I even set up split tunneling for it, but it still somehow figures out the VPN. The problem is, it doesn't let me do ATM withdrawals nor generate one-time virtual cards. Ironically, it still let's me view full details of my physical card...
So just disconnect from VPN? Oh, not so fast. It remembers that VPN was used at some point, and I'll have to deactivate the app and then reactivate it without ever connecting to VPN.
Since I have to deactivate and reactivate it daily, immediately when needed, this has led me to decreasing the security by using virtual card reader for 2FA kept on same device as opposed to using physical one and keeping it at home as I used to before this BS.
This is what I mean by the physical 2FA card reader:
Yes, that's the only thing at hand I had to cover the card number :)
Lmfao at the arch sticker. Also use arch btw.
Just make another user profile and dont put a vpn on it (assuming android)
Also it still knows you're using vpn because split tunnel still uses the VPN provider's DNS server, so sounds like they are also checking who you DNS provider is.
They sound like complete scumbags. Switch banks lol.
I use NextDNS. That's also used when I am connected to VPN. It seems to not be the problem. Maybe some Android service it talks with, I don't know.
Unfortunately, MIUI disabled the multi-user option for some reason.
You desperately need to use a custom rom. You have virtually zero mobile privacy until you do
I know. Especially after the last motherboard replacement. It used to run EUXM version, but now it runs MIXM. EUXM is version for EEA, and it has to comply with stuff like GDPR, so you get (optional) prompts for consent on data processing everywhere. Well, MIXM is the global variant, and this simply doesn't exist.
Anyway, I don't want to void my warranty by flashing custom ROM. After all, this phone already had not 1, but 2 in-warranty motherboard replacements, and there's still time (6 months) for more.
Poco X3 Pro's motherboard has it coming from both software and hardware. From software side, MIUI updates have high chance of hard-bricking the MOBO. From hardware side, the CPU has issues with cooking itself to death.
Yeah...
damn bro. you've been through the wringer. just simplify your life and get a new phone. Pixel 6a for Graphene maybe.
Oof. That really sucks.
Proton VPN advised me to switch to a different server when one is blocked by a website. That usually works for me. I haven't had the username and password problem though. I think the only sites I've had to turn my VPN off for were credit reference agencies.
This has been working for me. Sometimes it's just the country I randomly connected to and need to pick another random one.
We need laws that prevent companies from discriminating by how you look. Websites should only be able to deny customers based on how they act. A simple innocent GET from a user with a VPN IP should not be legally permissible reason to deny them.
That thing where they claim the username/password combo is wrong?
That sounds like a really good idea if the site thinks the reason they're a lot of different lock-on attemps from that one ip is because its a hacker with a list of stolen credentials.
Basically just tell them their list is fake and "go away and stop bothering our customers, please."
I've had this exact scenario happen with my Amazon account. One the one hand its annoying, but on the other I don't want them to make it easier for someone in another country to order stuff using my account and credit card.
Thats not a good idea because these systems false-positive all the time.
If my first login attempt has the correct username, correct password, and correct totp token, then I should always be let in. That's literally how auth works.
Yes! 100% agree with this and your law proposal!
You're right!
(Still think they might be doing just that, some of them.)
I don't know if it even works, but have you considered relying on their Stealth protocol? While its absence on Linux ~(and~ ~Windows)~ means that you might not even be able to make use of it in the first place, I'm still interested to know if it makes any difference.
deleted
Oh, this is great! I didn't know about the Stealth protocol. It's helped me log into at least one previously stubborn site! Thanks for sharing! 💯
While its absence on Linux (and Windows) means that you might not even be able to make use of it in the first place...
Welp, time to run a proxy server on your phone.
In Termux there's 4 as far as I am aware. Squid, polipo, privoxy and tinyproxy. I use tinyproxy because it's pretty simple to set up. Just check the man page.
Alternatively there's app called "Android proxy server" in Google Play Store, which is the simplest solution
If you decide to use basic authentication, keep in mind that it's not encrypted. It's transported in base64. So definitely don't reuse passwords, as if you should do that otherwise anyway. If you really don't want someone else to connect to it, just leave it on localhost and use SSH tunnel.
If you decide to use basic authentication, keep in mind that it’s not encrypted. It’s transported in base64.
You should be using https anyway so that should not matter.
I am talking about basic authentication to HTTP proxy. Useful on multi-user LAN networks.
You can't hide behind a VPN and access the entirety of the net. There will always be some site that will block you. It's just par for the course. Unwinnable battle.
Solution: run your own VPN on a VPS. Write a configuration file/script to rotate IPs/machines so you're not stuck on one IP all the time.
Vultr and DO have hourly pricing and a good API for one to do so
We wouldn't need VPNs in the first place (for the modern use cases) except that security and IT guys started blocking or limiting content based on user IP address.
That needs to stop entirely, it's a defective feel good security measure that is easily defeated by an attacker willing to spend a few bucks for a new IP.
Fortunately VPN tech is very flexible, so there are ways to get yourself a dedicated IP that nobody else can use, solving the problem and defeating those IT guys.
Try the new stealth protocol. Never have any issues :)
Chain your vpn to another VPN that actually uses real domestic client IP's then u just look like a normal user to webstites
Which VPN providers use domestic client IPs?
the every expensive botnet type