this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
198 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4192 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 189 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, this should be no surprise.

She's been bending over backwards for Trump since day one, and she's spent this entire time dragging her feet on even the most basic of issues. She created delay after delay, and is now using the delay she created as the justification for granting the postponement that Trump has been seeking all along.

"Mid November." What a god damned coincidence. The rotting corpse of Hellen Keller could have seen right through that load of bullshit.

[–] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I'm convinced she's literally in communication with his team or people once removed. This is the most slam dunk case ever. Did he have these documents? Yes. Was he allowed to? No.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh man if the prosecution brought evidence of that to the DoJ things would get spicy.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there anyway they can throw her out or do something about this cunts corruption? Seriously we going allow her to keep this from proceeding until she is sure he is President and can pardon himself.

[–] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, they can appeal to the 11th circuit to have her removed. That's not an easy thing to do though.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s such an open and shut case, he may still be convicted with all the help in the world. If that happens he is in a bad position to effectively argue that she was biased against him.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

That "may" is doing a lot of heavy-lifting. I don't want revenge" or to punish Trump because I don't like him (though I don't). I want justice to be served. The judge is clearly biased toward him, and that could result in a miscarriage of justice. She must be removed.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

There's still plenty of time to let her dig her grave deeper.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And is there any mechanism in place for her removal as a judge, just based on overall being unfit for the role?

[–] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. She'd have to be impeached by the House of Representatives, then convicted in the Senate by a 2/3 majority. Basically will never happen.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

We basically have a system where, as soon as the fascists capture 1/3 of the government, we have no legal defense against them seizing the other 2/3.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's cause cannon is corrupt

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 124 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like how they say it needs to be delayed because he’s campaigning. Fuck that. Crimes come first.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, sorry I won't be able to pay that speeding ticket right now, I'm campaigning.

Oh, when will I be done? I suppose when the Galactic Council finally holds the vote to appoint me Supreme Galactic Overlord. Until then!

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NO FAIR, THAT'S THE POSITION I WANTED!!!

[–] PK2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Position already taken

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Settle down there, Palpatine.

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My guess is she'll grant a delay but won't cite his campaigning because she knows that won't fly with appellate judges.

She'll have enough other bullshit justifications to give Trump what he wants and get her kickback.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

My understanding is that scheduling delays are not appealable, at least not by the prosecution. Judges have the right to set their own schedules.

She just doesn't want to look blatantly corrupt if and when anything does go to appeal though. She's doing her best to postpone this trial indefinitely while still maintaining something resembling plausible impartiality. I'm sure that when "Mid November 2024" comes around, she'll suddenly have another reason to delay because Trump will then be appealing the results of the election about 47 times, and heaven forbid her case interfere with that and after all that he's gonna need more time to prepare. So, January 2026 then? What? He'll be too old and suffering from dementia and therefore isn't competent to stand trial, even though he still appears on TV every day? Darn. I guess she'll just have to postpone this trial indefinitely. It's too bad......the people deserved to hear the truth, but whatever was she to do? The situation was completely unavoidable!!!

[–] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I’m sure that when “Mid November 2024” comes around, she’ll suddenly have another reason to delay because Trump will then be appealing the results of the election about 47 times

Hopefully he'll be in a Georgia prison by then. He can't pardon his way out of that one either.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She’s doing her best to postpone this trial indefinitely while still maintaining something resembling plausible impartiality

No chance in Hell of that. She's going for blatantly implausible impartiality, at best.

The way she's acting, she might as well be thumbing her nose at everyone who isn't a fucking MAGA traitor and yelling "neener neener neener, you can't stop me!"

🤔 I wonder what was on those documents that the rest of the government is allowing this to happen to keep quiet.

I wonder for example if Trump dug up papers with nuclear secrets and tried to sell them. Ooh, or UFOs.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the Trump team asking Cannon to postpone the trial “until at least mid-November 2024.”

How terribly convenient ....

about a month ago, Trump’s team wanted thousands of pages of evidence it already had from the investigation given to them again, so that they could see where copies of classified documents in a box stored at Mar-a-Lago may have existed among other documents, to “ascertain where the pages had been stored,” prosecutors said.

It's not up to the prosecutors to make up for Trump's lawyers' lack of organization.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

It’s rank bullshit, yes.

This is the same judge that allowed a special master, and that was reversed by the 3 judge appeals panel with scathing commentary.

Her head is so far up trump’s ass the hamberders taste mostly fresh.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Of course she did. We knew as soon as this judge was assigned the case that she was going to try to wreck it, like she did the last one.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Justice delayed is justice denied.

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Has there been a more incompetent, political judge to ever sit on the bench? I can't imagine how.

[–] overzeetop@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Clarance Thomas: “Am I a joke to you?”

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, yes you are.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 26 points 1 year ago

This corrupt idiot has no business being a judge. But whatever, she's a sideshow. He's fucked in NY and GA. If she wants to make her name synonymous with "bought and paid for stooge" in a vain attempt to shield the orange idiot from the consequences of his own actions, let her.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this the part where I say "this man will never see substantive consequences" or are we still pretending he might?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

WHERE’S THE UNREDACTED MUELLER REPORT. MERRICK!

?$%#$&*!!

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The people have a right to a speedy trial too.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago document-mishandling case cast doubt on the viability having a trial in May 2024, signaling she may postpone the criminal proceedings.

Cannon told Justice Department prosecutor Jay Bratt, who asked to keep the trial schedule as is: “I’m not seeing in your position a level of understanding to these realities.”

“After four months of delay, we were allowed to review for the first time documents that are critical to some of the serious felony charges” that special counsel Jack Smith has filed, Trump’s lawyers wrote to the court two weeks ago.

The classified records indictment has loomed over Trump’s candidacy particularly because of the questions it’s raised – with substantial known witnesses and even audio evidence – about how casually Trump treated national security information that could damage the United States if accessed at his club and about his unwillingness after his presidency to comply with regulations around presidential records.

In a filing last week, prosecutors told the judge Trump’s team has cried wolf about their access to evidence in the case, including classified records.

Trump’s legal team has been reviewing and discussing classified evidence in Miami, most recently on Tuesday, when the former president joined his lawyers in the SCIF during the afternoon, according to a source familiar with the matter.


The original article contains 577 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Seems like she's trying to avoid a mistrial due to the incompetence of the defense team.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Is there any way to get this judge removed?