this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
158 points (97.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35926 readers
1327 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There are some brands of bicycles that can cost more than the down payment on a car. Why? Surely making a bike lightweight and reliable isn't so difficult that it warrants that price? Is it just the brand name or maybe it has to do with customization options?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As people dive deeper into a hobby they have very particular desires. That means two things: (1) specialty parts with very low sales volumes, and (2) people are willing to pay extra to get exactly what they want. If I just want two wheels and a set of pedals and don't really care about the details then I can grab any $200 bike from a department store. But if I want, say, a very particular drivetrain, carbon fiber parts to shave weight, maybe a specific suspension design, mounting points for niche accessories, etc., then I'm shopping for very specific items from boutique brands. That's why a very small number of hardcore riders do crazy stuff like pay over $4k for a set of wheels.

You'll see the same thing in other hobbies, too. I can't imagine what some people spend on their gaming PCs.

[–] DaGeek247@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similiar amounts for the literal absolute best. Most people don't spend more than 1500 total though.

[–] TesterJ@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$1500 gets you a pretty kickass gaming PC, even if it's not absolute top of the line.

In mountain biking, $1500 gets you a solid hard tail or an entry-level full suspension from a direct-to-consumer brand like Polygon if you're buying new.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In PC gaming, you can get a GPU for that $1500. You can also get a high end custom water cooling setup. Just the water cooling components.

[–] TesterJ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right, but that's top of the line stuff. You can easily build a PC with a 70 tier GPU for less than $1500 and you'll still have a kickass gaming PC.

The XX70 tier equivalent mountain bikes cost like $3000-$3500. I'm thinking along the lines of a Trek Remedy 7 (which is what I have), a base Santa Cruz Bronson, or a base Specialized Stumpjumper. There are plenty more but those are just 3 from some big brands.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

The amount you spend also scales with how much you want to use the device, and the quality. It's similar with power tools.

£100 combi drill? For the average DIY user, exactly the same functionality as a £500 one.
For a tradesman using it 7 hours a day, 240 days a year, the more comfortable/reliable one may well pay for itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krulsprietje@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Low key loving it that people here automatically assume that a bike would mean you would go on trails and off road while here in the Netherlands we still are riding that old riggidy hunk of metal (a Omafiets) we got handed down form our sister 15 years ago. (Who also got it as a hand me down)

There are nice bikes here with carbon fiber belts instead of metal chains but those get quickly stolen or used so much they wear down away in a few years because the bikes get beaten to bits by the weather and usage.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The best kind of bike is one you can lock up and not worry about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

One of my favorite episode of Top Gear was when the boys went to Africa and brought used cars for a thousand pound [UK] then drove them across the continent without many mishaps. They pointed out that there were people in London / New York City who brought high end SUVs to handle six inches of snow on a paved road.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

But even that was kind of cheating. I think May had the Mercedes 300D, which is probably the most reliable car ever made, and Hammond had an Opel that had already survived 50 years there. The only one who really struggled was Clarkson in the Lancia, which makes sense.

[–] 1847953620@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's something of a point, but they're also followed around by a literal caravan of assistants for their show, including mechanics and a van full of parts, just in case anything goes wrong.

Edit: not to mention fully prepared to handle logistics and expense of staying at hotels or even camping out if needed, not to mention tools and equipment for major roadside repairs.

I had to convince a woman with a giant SUV at the base of a slick uphill road that this was the reason she bought that thing. She was blocking the road in paralysis. After I convinced her to go up she made it up, no problem. People think they need a tank to deal with an inch of snow.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

brought high end SUVs to handle six inches of snow on a paved road.

Pavement princess

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Making a bike lightweight is not so hard. Making a bike lightweight and durable is. Top end bikes use high end materials and are engineered to very high standards. But if you just want to get from A Too B, a cheap bike will do just fine.

[–] kaffeeringe@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Plus they don't get made in large numbers.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For some more extreme riders, they need bikes that are designed way stronger than any average bike. Imagine jumping a 50 foot ramp on a common bicycle, you'll straight up break the frame in half.

I had met a retired rider from https://m.pinkbike.com/ and had a chance to ride his ~$8000 bicycle, that thing was built like a friggin' tank with some of the most advanced mechanical features I've ever seen, including adjustable hydraulic shocks.

As far as lightweight, that bike was anything but lightweight, it was rather heavy actually, but when frame and fork strength is way more important, that's just a necessary tradeoff for safety in extreme riding.

[–] 9715698@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

My brother used to be on Pinkbike! Thanks for the nostalgia trip.

[–] Lemonparty@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We should really stop propagating this narrative that all bikes are expensive. Insanely sophisticated race bikes or gravel bikes that you could throw off a cliff without your derailleur getting misaligned are very expensive. A very good, reliable, and perfectly usable bike for the average person cost <$500. Even that is a lot for some people but it's a LONG way off from the $3k-20k bikes people THINK they need it worse people ASSUME is what all bikes cost. The best selling models of almost every major manufacturer are their lowest and middle tier entry level bikes, which is a slight step up from what you can buy at a Walmart or target. Those Walmart and Target bikes btw, will serve the vast majority of people just fine.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, the OP did say "some brands" not ALL bikes. Also, I have one of those Walmart bikes and I pity the foo who owns one. On my very first ride, my pants tore the chain guard off. Pretty sure it was there to protect my pants. Then when I came to a stop, the seat exploded. Springs, nuts, bolts and washers went flying. I had to gather them up again and try to piece it back together to keep the seat usable. It's ridiculously heavy too. If you can't afford a nice new bike, I recommend buying a decent used one at a garage sale or something. I don't agree that they will serve the vast majority of people just fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

$500 is still insane to me. I'm Dutch and I've been riding bikes pretty much daily for my whole life. I don't think I've ever used a bike that cost more than €200. Almost every bike I've used is either secondhand or a hand-me-down. My current bike has a front wheel that has been folded into a 90-degree angle and back (which is noticeable), has only one working brake, and only 2 of the 7 gears work well. Yet for the past 2.5 years I've reliably and comfortably driven trips without issues. Whether it is a 10-minute trip to the supermarket or work, or a 40-minute trip to the next city over for some party, it always gets me there.

I don't really understand the sentiment in this comment section that a bike should always be a fancy new bike of $500 or even $3K when a trusty old rustbucked could also get you the same distance for a hundred bucks or even way less.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The corrrect answer is massive profiteering off of suckers.

There’s some engineering expense, that makes real bikes that last years and perform reliably, which makes it more expensive than a Walmart bike, but after that it’s rip off city.

Easiest measure to illustrate this, is the price of motorcycles. You can drop £10k on road bike or mountain bike, and still not really get top of the range. Look up what kind of motorcycle you can get for that money and then make a value judgement .

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not just marketing. Carbon fibre and weight reduction can get very expensive.

Of course, you pretty quickly hit diminishing returns, and most people don't actually need that for a short weekend trip.

But it can make sense to spend a few thousand on a bike, if you're using it to commute or you use it for work (deliveries, etc.).

price of motorcycles. You can drop £10k on road bike or mountain bike, and still not really get top of the range. Look up what kind of motorcycle you can get for that money and then make a value judgement .

Don't know much about bikes, but I remember reading the story of someone who had bought something insane. Think a high end ducati. Anyway, he was complaining about how it overheated and/or got to hot at traffic lights. Someone pointed out it wasn't designed to idle at a traffic light or cruise highway speeds. He was driving it too slowly for it to cool the engine properly. He'd bought a bike that was designed to go fast, only to find out it wasn't actually that good at riding around at relatively slow speeds.

Don't know if that's true, but it does illustrate that more expensive isn't always necessarily a better choice for an individual user.

[–] LucyLastic@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, nah, Ducatis are like the carbon road bikes of the motorcycle world - all about dick waving. A little while back one of the larger YouTube channels took the latest Ducati to a track and put it up against a cheap 7 year old Suzuki, and the Suzuki was still faster ... and if you buy a Japanese sport bike it's not going to have the mechanical problems of a Ducati either.

Source: I have owned, ridden, repaired and raced a lot of motorbikes, including some fast-ish ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

10k mountain bike is like 95% the same bike as what a professional mountain biker would use in a competition. 10k motorbike is consumer grade junk that would probably break within minutes if you abuse it like you do a pro bike.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)

So, as an example. The Honda CBR650R is $9,899.

You can absolutely abuse that for thousands of miles.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Ninja 400 for 6000 and that's basically the honda civic of motorcycles. Very reliable even after being crashed multiple times

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

What make bikes so expensive?

R.: The willing of people to buy them.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago

For a lot of people the point of a hobby seems to be as an outlet for their unhealthy relationship with money and purchasing, and markets find ways to take advantage of that.

You can buy good used bikes for cheap though, and maintain them cheaply also, so it isn't a problem for people who are not stupidly rich or insane.

[–] Glemek@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Something I haven't seen mentioned in these threads is economies of scale. Most cars are kind of engineering and machining marvels especially for their price, with a huge amount of their manufacturing being automated to a very high level. Fancy bikes probably do not have the production volume to justify that kind of automation. Their price represents their actual production being less efficient, not being able to amortize the R&D costs over as many units, and general luxury premium.

[–] eksb@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mountain bikes have to be lightweight and strong, and production volume is low. Suspension design takes R&D, and adds moving parts. Start pricing components and you hit $5000 easy for a full-suspension bike. For hardtails, you are making a lot of compromises at $1500, but $2500 gets you a nice bike.

For road/gravel bikes, once you get over $2000, you are paying a lot of money for tiny weight savings, negligible aerodynamic improvements, and electronic gizmos.

For either mountain or road, if you want a custom/hand-made frame and parts made in the developed world paying living wages, you are going to spend a lot more. Taiwan makes a lot of great frames, but if you want a frame made buy a dude in Denver who names all his bikes after craft beers, add several grand.

For city/commuter bikes, you can get something perfectly good for under $1000, but if you can swing $2000, get a Brompton.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's just wild how the pandemic made the previous numbers double.

Got a great decent bike for $700 in 2015. Same bike runs $1600 now.

[–] skulblaka@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Everyone saw a convenient economic scapegoat and just "forgot" to lower the prices again after the crisis was over. Now, everyone has been paying these new and improved prices for 3 years, so they're never going to go down again.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While what a lot of people said is true, with R&D costs, economy of scale, and such, a lot of it is profit too. They make bank on those high end bikes. Then they spend a chunk of that bank to sponsor riders, races, and advertising, so that they can continue making bank. What really gets my goat is bike shops around here charging $198 an hour for super basic mechanics. Anyone with any sort of mechanical aptitude can work on bicycles. It's not rocket science.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's not rocket science.

Now I just wish I had a rocket bike.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kleenbhole@lemy.lol 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The answer is economy of scale, the collapse of the American manufacturing industry, bloated budgets, especially brand/marketing budgets, and the prices set by OEM manufacturers who themselves have bloated budgets. A lot of these brands arent actually manufacturers but middlemen for manufacturers. They do design, service, marketing and maybe assembly. But manufacturing is primarily done overseas. If it's manufactured domestically the labor and material costs are commensurate. Maybe the frame is made domestically, maybe not.

A perfectly decent bicycle is less than $100 in China.

[–] Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"some brands of bikes" make frames out of carbon fiber with wireless derailleurs and have rear facing radar to detect when other bikes or vehicles are approaching, how fast, and on which side.

When your exercise, your recreation, your hobby, and your transportation are all the same thing, it's easy to justify spending more to make those things as easy and pleasant as possible.

You can get a perfectly usable bike for very little money in America... Probably still made in China though 😂

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Same way as high-end sports cars can cost hundreds of thousands or even millions.

Regular commuters are cheap, you can get perfectly good 2nd hand bike for a pocket money, but a high-end enduro bike with state-of-art parts and exotic materials can cost you over 10k.

[–] Glifted@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gaybees@artemis.camp 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can only on road bikes as that’s what I ride. But it seems like the biggest factor that drives up prices is a combination of weight and aerodynamics.

For just regular people, If you know where to look you can get a high end bike that was unfinished at the factory and didn’t get painted/stickered/branded and pay a fraction of the price. A lot of time the branding is what really drives up prices.

But in the very high end it’s really all about weight and aero. Professional racers will pay a hefty premium to knock a few grams off of their bikes total weight, or to get parts that are more aerodynamic and thus give you better power transfer between your bike and the road.

And then the lighter you want to get, you start getting diminished returns, and exponentially higher prices. Like if you compare a 3 pound saddle to a 1 pound saddle it might be a little bit more expensive. But then if you have a 150 gram saddle and want to get a 100 gram saddle that might be 20x the price.

Lighter parts also have to sustain the same amount of forces (and sometimes much much more) as their heavy duty steel counterparts so finding things that can undergo this amount of stress and not break plays into it as well.

And this doesn’t even go into materials. The big new thing is titanium bikes which are ridiculously expensive but will last several lifetimes if taken care of. And then carbon fiber is difficult to make and even more difficult to make well. Much lighter and than other materials but really only flexes in one direction and can be really fragile if under the wrong type of stress.

[–] aramus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you know where to look you can get a high end bike that was unfinished at the factory and didn’t get painted/stickered/branded and pay a fraction of the price.

Can you tell me where that is?

[–] Gaybees@artemis.camp 4 points 1 year ago

This is for the US, not sure about elsewhere, but…

The easy and reliable way for most people is probably just bikesdirect.com
I’ll fully admit that their website looks like you’re immediately gonna get scammed, but it’s legit and I’ve ordered from them. Don’t just trust me though, search around and find people who have posted and can verify that they’ve ordered and it’s legit.
They’re importers who sell branded and off/non branded bikes direct from the manufacturers at a heavy discount. Shipping is free, but it takes a pretty long time since they’re shipping it from China

The hard and less reliable way is to ask around. I got to be good friends with the owner of my local bike shop, and he’s the type of person who organizes races and does a lot of custom work, so he knows a couple people who run small bike factories/workshops in the US. They sometimes have bikes that have some marks on the down tube or a slightly messy weld etc. but otherwise perfectly great bikes that they can’t sell. So it’s definitely a long shot and more likely in cities with a big biking scene, but this is where you get the best deal. I got a frame for $300 and they would have sold it for over $1500 but didn’t because the holes for a water bottle cage were milled slightly off center.

[–] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I've seen a carbon fiber fork withstand the weight of a car (equivalent, not an actual full size car)

I've also seen a carbon fiber rear triangle fold from bumping into a rock at an almost-standstill.

Gotta say, I like the idea of a titanium bike.

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Although this YouTube video is about motorbikes and high-end mountain bikes, much of the context is applicable to bicycles at large. And is also within the ballpark of an automobile down payment.

https://youtu.be/BS9ugdl1FZc

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Borrowing some of the points from that video, a high-end bicycle -- let's say a road bike -- is very close to what could actually be used in competitive road cycling, with all the technological and material sciences advances included. Whereas a standard car like a Toyota Corolla would need substantial further investment to bring it to competition grade (eg rallying). And a high-end, track-inspired road-legal car would be exceeding $100,000 easily.

Certainly, in the average quality range, the price of your average road bike and your average automobile will be a chasm away. But I figured your question is focusing on the high end of bicycles.

[–] keckbug@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

In fact, in a few certain situations you can actually purchase higher-end hardware than the pros use. UCI has restrictions on shape and weight that need not apply to non sanctioned riders, and there are improvements that are available in both aero and weight. Notably, Triathlon specific bikes are often markedly faster than UCI compliant bikes due to the aggressive aerodynamic optimization.

load more comments
view more: next ›