this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
115 points (99.1% liked)

News

23287 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Shocked and fearful Maine residents are keeping to their homes for a second night as hundreds of police and FBI agents search intently for Robert Card, a U.S.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah, the country of the free, where a whole town is in lockdown just because one guy who shouldn't exercised his freedom of owning guns!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Don't forget the trillion dollar surveillance state that doesn't prevent 99% of mass shootings, and hasn't been able to track down this guy; probably after walking around with a tracking device in his pocket the last 24 hours...

[–] dyathinkhesaurus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

He's the "wrong" colour tho, that's why he surveillance isn't working properly /s

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well, with the amount of time this has gone on, he could be just about anywhere East of the Mississippi at this point. Drive 8 hours away into the middle of nowhere, find a secluded house, kill the occupant and lie low for a few weeks.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Why aren't all the pro-gun people in Maine out hunting him with their cool guns? They promised to keep everyone safe from tyranny and crime, even pledging to give up their lives for it.

But not only are they not doing that, they're defending themselves with doors, the things they claimed couldn't keep you safe and even blamed for school shootings.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Makes sense. Shooter isn't using a "normal" AR-15, it's shooting .308 rounds which have a far greater range on them.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/family-maine-shooting-suspect-says-mental-health-deteriorated-rapidly-rcna122353

"The weapon believed to have been used in the attack was a sniper rifle with .308 caliber bullets, and it was purchased legally this year, officials said."

In case you're wondering what difference that makes, a stock AR-15 is generally a .223 round.

https://www.ammoman.com/blog/223-vs-308-two-sides-of-the-same-coin/

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What's the difference aside from range, more power?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From the source with the image:

55 Grain 223 FMJ Ammo
Average muzzle velocity – 2867 fps
Average muzzle energy – 1004 ft/lbs
Bullet drop at 500 yards – 75.02 inches

147 Grain 308 FMJ Ammo
Average muzzle velocity – 2672 fps
Average muzzle energy – 2330 ft/lbs
Bullet drop at 500 yards – 61.42 inches

Slower bullet, just barely, but 2x the energy.

Let's see if I can find a ballistics gel video:

https://youtu.be/-8dZxwz9NY4

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Checkout ballistic performance for 308

Here's 223

Look at the energy specifically. 308 is a 7.62mm wide projectile, compared to the 223,which is 5.56mm, meaning it's much bigger. Normal 223 you can buy is gonna be 55 gr (4 g) while 308 has a much wider range between 150 gr (10 g) to 180 gr (11.7 g). While 308 is only going 80% of the speed of 223, it's 3 times heavier.

308 energy: 2,718 ft⋅lbf (3,685 J) 223 energy: 1,265 ft⋅lbf (1,715 J) That's a little more than twice as much power.

TL;DR 308 is used for hunting animals like deer and other mid size game, most states in the US do not allow 223 to be used for hunting those types of animals (underpowered)

[–] 520@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It means you've got someone on the loose with the capacity and mindset to absolutely twat people at a distance. See for reference the Washington Sniper.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the DC sniper who used a .223 AR-15?

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct. Now imagine someone who could fuck you up from MUCH further away

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As it turns out it's much more effecient to mass murder people at relatively close range than stupidly trying to take long range skill shots, so being afraid of boogy man sniper isn't really a thing.

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is, everyone is now looking for him, so if he wants to continue his rampage, outskirt territory with a vantage point is the only option.

That, or if he doesn't value his life at all, do what he did last time.

[–] neuropean@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Much bigger bullet.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nothing in practical terms here. Range is irrelevant, this guy isn't shooting people from 800 yards away. Power is largely irrelevant...somewhat more trauma from a bullet wound in certain circumstances.

When talking about walking around murdering people the caliber of the rifle isn't important in the slightest. It's a rifle round, that's all you really need to know.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Cost, weight, size, terminal ballistics, noise/sound, availability...

[–] HerrLewakaas@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that enough of a difference?

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Huh? I know very little about weapons and wanted to know more.

[–] XbSuper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That really isn't all that relevant, especially the range, this guy isn't lining up 300+ yd shots, he's spraying and praying.

Only real difference is a .308 will hit harder, and leave a bigger hole, so a shot that may just be a wound with a .223, could wind up lethal with a .308. But any bullet can kill a man.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In terms of a stay at home order though, yeah. He's a threat from cross town. It makes sense to tell people to stay inside.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Difference? Victim of gun violence is dead vs. Victim of gun violence is dead?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Victim of gun violence dead from across the room vs victim of gun violence dead from 3 football fields away.

It makes sense to keep people indoors when they could likely never see the shooter.

[–] acupofcoffee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both rounds are deadly out to 1000 yards and beyond, get outta here with that crap. Whether it’s effective or not is irrelevant. You wouldn’t find me not taking cover if someone was shooting at my position with 5.56 800 yards away.

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If they were shooting at you with a weapon designed for those ranges, and expertise in said weapon, you'll be dead before you know what's going on.

If this guy is trained in hunting animals with such weaponry well... The ideal they go for is a single round to the ~~head~~ heart before the target even suspects something's up. If they are consistently good at that with deer, then humans aren't exactly harder.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The ideal shot on a deer is through the heart. Hunting by shooting at the smallest, most mobile part of the deer is less common.

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Okay that's fair, my bad. Point is, they're going for one shot, one kill

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hunters generally don't shoot at the part they want to take as a trophy.

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Okay that's fair, my bad. Point is, they're going for one shot, one kill

[–] Stuka@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's really clear you don't know what you're talking about alat all here...

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

🇺🇸 F R E E D O M 🦅

[–] burchalka@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that necessitate help of army? If the police can't control the situation in 24 hours, they should bring in several hundred/thousands soldiers and start house to house search of the whole area...

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 18 points 1 year ago (15 children)

The army can't be used for such things. The national guard can, but they're still not intended for domestic law enforcement situations.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm willing to bet this guy shot himself already and it's now a matter of finding the body.

[–] CylonBunny@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Geraldine Largay, “Inchworm”, was a hiker who went missing off the Appalachian Trail in Maine and died in 2013. It took two years for them to find her body, and it was found only a couple of miles from the trail. Those woods are so thick. If he’s dead if could be a long time until he is found.

[–] RedC@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nice guess, turned out to be true

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Actually the army can be used for it so long as they're subservient to the national guard, essentially working as aides.

Plus posse comitatus has never effectively been used.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›