this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
121 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
1811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

Right, nearing mass production is what we call it when their PR department announced just a couple weeks ago that they're delaying the project until 2025, and they've been working on it for a decade.

These posts need to stop. Their only purpose is to lead gullible people on while the company desperately wishes for a magical fix to all their problems.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll believe it when it's actually in production. Toyota has been making claims about this for a long time now and it always seems to be "just a few years" away.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's where I am, too. We've been hearing that fully practical electrification of transportation is Just Around The Corner! since the '90's. I'm still waiting for it to actually happen.

But I'm ready. Bring it on already.

On the bright side, with several almost completely practical BEV's on the market already we're much closer than we've ever been.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, thankfully there's more manufacturers trying to make it work. Samsung sounds promising

Other companies have also made progress recently. Chinese battery maker CATL revealed it was preparing to mass-produce its semi-solid batteries before the year’s end, while South Korea’s Samsung SDI has completed a fully automated pilot line for solid-state batteries.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A Samsung car would have pop-up ads on the windshield

[–] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago

And parts to repair it be unavailable after a year

[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Toyota president Koji Sato also admitted that production volumes of solid-state batteries were likely to be small when the company rolls them out in electric vehicles as early as 2027. “I think the most important thing at the moment is to put out [the solid-state batteries] into the world and we will consider expansion in volume from there,” he said.

SOOOOO not really close.. another press release hyping this up. How small is SMALL? Hundreds?

They clearly are still having trouble scaling production of this technology. It has EXISTED for some time but isn't of use to cars if they can't make hundreds of thousands of them.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they're using the promise of better batteries to make people reconsider buying full electric vehicles now. I expect it to be exactly like fusion, always a few years away.

[–] Bjornir@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Commercial fusion is not a few years away, and I've never seen the claim apart from deranged individuals on Twitter. If everything goes to plan, commercial fusion won't be here for a few decades.

What the claim may have been is experimental fusion, which does exist right now, we have generated power using fusion, and we even made more power than we put into it recently. It's moving, but it's slow, as planned for the last few decades.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

And even that "more power than we put into it" comes with a big asterisk. The power being output by the laser is smaller than the power being output by fusion. Big lasers tend to be grossly inefficient things. We'll need at least 10 times the output in order to generate enough to power the laser. That's not even considering the power usage of the facility around it.

So, yeah, we're at least a few years away from enough power for the laser to sustain itself, at least a few more to be able to run the facility and still have net power, and then at least a decade after that to get to commercialization.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

As far as electrification goes, Toyota is virtually at the bottom of the list of car manufacturer . I'll see it when I believe it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

F.U.D. Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt. A favorite tactic of IBM, then Microsoft, now Toyota. If you can’t compete, announce an upcoming “breakthrough” so customers will delay purchases from competitors

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Truth, these type of announcements are meant to instill a sense if something better is coming if we just wait. It's a honest strategy if there is truly something in the works but right now a lot of misinformation is just making it an bad strategy to use.

[–] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah with car manufacturers the usual tactic is 'concept' cars of 'the next model' containing every single thing a consumer could wish for.. which of course never get built.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Pontiac Aztec was the worst ever. The concept was so cool and they claimed almost ready for production. It would have been YUGE! ….. then somehow they released a completely different disaster of a vehicle that is now part of history as one of the worst ever

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] ripcord@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that leaves them towards the bottom, since that's pretty much it.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Prius was the first mass market car in the entire world that could drive on battery power. Sure, the range sucked, and they dropped the ball after that by failing to shift focus to hydrogen, but the fact is Toyota does have a history of strong innovation in this space and I could totally see them being the first to ship a car with a solid state battery.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What have they done in this space since then?

The fact that they have some history doesn't mean they're even close to being a leader at the moment, which I think was the original point. Having done very little since the Prius leaves them towards the bottom.

Considering a lot of other claims and all the feet dragging and other things people have mentioned I also will believe it when I see it and not before.

But I'm with you that it could happen, and I hope it does.

[–] Patch@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The Prius was the first mass market car in the entire world that could drive on battery power.

Firstly, no it wasn't. There were many attempts at pure BEV in the twentieth century, including several "mass market" models in the 90s. None were particularly successful, but that doesn't make Prius the first.

Secondly, that was more than quarter of a century ago. The first Prius came out as many years before today as the Apollo 15 moon landing was before the Prius. The market has moved on. Toyota can't dine out on Prius forever.

Arguably their biggest cockup was betting the house on hydrogen while the rest of the market realised battery-electric was the way to go. Hydrogen is a dead end technology for private cars, and Toyota was pretty much alone in not realising this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And then sat around for about the next two decades and watched everyone surpass them.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wtf is this linked to? A good dozen tries and I can’t pass the captcha? Am I just a sentient robot who is unaware or this a mechanical Turk thing where I’m helping some bot pass l

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] sky@codesink.io 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you use Cloudflare DNS (1.1.1.1)? They block it because they remove some trackable information from requests.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's fucking stupid. But yes, I had the same problem, and the article is behind a paywall 😥

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not intentionally, but I’m on iOS which ma becrelevant

[–] millifoo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Same here - not sure if this is a cloudflare problem, but i've been getting these more and more. I'm on a Mac, I'm pretty darn sure I don't have a virus, so I don't know what's going on.

Never did get to the article, btw.

[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Very interested to see what things look like not when it releases but a few years after.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wake me when it happens

[–] TvanBuuren@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Someone enlighten me: what is a non-solid-state battery?

[–] Kazumara@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

One with a fluid electrolyte. That includes current Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Polymer batteries, as well as the older Nickle-Metal Hydride and Lead-Acid batteries.

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lithium-ion battery is composed of cathode, anode, separator and electrolyte. Lithium-ion batteries for smartphones, power tools and EVs uses liquid electrolyte solution. On the other hand, a solid-state battery uses solid electrolyte, not liquid.

https://www.samsungsdi.com/column/technology/detail/56462.html

[–] TvanBuuren@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was unaware that a lithium battery was liquid.

TIL, thank you, kind Lemmer.

[–] fuzzy_feeling@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you puncture one with a nail or something, you can see the liquid drip out... /s

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

It's pretty tasty too, but quite spicy

[–] UristMcHolland@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If you can look past the fire and toxic fumes

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Liquid in the scientific sense, it's more of a paste. Lithium hexafluorophosphate(aka LiFPO) mixed with Dimethyl carbonate or Diethyl carbonate which are just there to float the Lithium between the plates without letting it burst into flame from any humidity that might happen to reach in.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Problems include the extreme sensitivity of the batteries to moisture and oxygen, as well as the mechanical pressure needed to hold them together

Not quite the ideal thing to have in a real world car. For example, what happens after a little accident leaves an opening in the hull of such a battery? Or creates some more pressure than needed here and there?

[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably safer than current ev batteries

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

Why? Solid state batteries don't use a flammable electrolyte

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›