this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
22 points (89.3% liked)

Linux

47290 readers
637 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
22
Font rendering on GNOME vs KDE (lemdro.id)
submitted 11 months ago by mfat@lemdro.id to c/linux@lemmy.ml
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Is it just me or fonts really look better on GNOME and other (gtk DEs)? With the same font smoothing/anti-aliasing settings, text in GNOME is smoother and more similar to MacOS fonts.

A good example is Cantrell font. It looks way better in GNOME than in KDE.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I was gonna call antialiasing and smoothing settings, but

With the same font smoothing/anti-aliasing settings

Where did you set those? Do other fonts like Noto / Liberation also look different on Gnome? Is it a difference between GTK vs Qt rather than which DE it runs on?

I don't have Gnome so I can't compare directly, but on KDE fonts look identical between GTK and Qt applications, and the compositor isn't involved with font rendering. Which leads me to, some settings have to be different on Gnome vs KDE.

[–] mfat@lemdro.id 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I set those using the Sustem Settings (KDE) and Tweaks (GNOME). To me all fonts look a bit different between Gnome and KDE.

[–] skilltheamps@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

Choose a font and size, then do screenshots of the same word on kde and gnome. Then open gimp, put each screenshot in a layer, align them and make it show the difference. Then you objectively know if and how they're different

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 4 points 11 months ago

Can you share the exact settings and screenshots to compare?

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

Are you using gnome x11 or gnome wayland and plasma x11 or plasma wayland?

[–] federalreverse@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

The settings are not an exact match between desktops, even though they are named the same. The backend library, Freetype, that renders fonts is the same, however.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago

Take a screenshot?

[–] superguy@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

I thought fonts always looked better on QT DEs.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

I tend to think it’s a difference between GTK and Qt – anecdotal, but I get (what I see as) better rendering in LXDE, XFCE, and Gnome and a more heavier hand in LXQT and KDE – I haven’t done any decent comparisons comparing Qt apps inside Gnome or GTK apps inside KDE to give any sort of baseline though …

[–] VHS@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The backend should be the same (Freetype)… only difference I can think of is that GNOME uses Wayland by default while KDE defaults to X11 and offers Wayland as an option. Do you have a HiDPI screen?

[–] mfat@lemdro.id 3 points 11 months ago

I use X11 on both DEs with an Apple Cinema Display 27".

[–] mfat@lemdro.id 1 points 11 months ago

I use X11 on both DEs with an Apple Cinema Display 27".

[–] raven@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

I'm just upset that they took bitmap font support away from me angery

Low res displays unusable now.