This means 90% of the year is spent on remote work, and the remaining 10% is dedicated to employee off-site events.
What does that mean? Five weeks of retreat a year? Who pays for that?
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
245 points (92.4% liked)
Technology
59201 readers
4009 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I wouldn’t take the 90/10 literally. It probably is closer to 1 week per quarter at an offsite event.
which is not that uncommon at a tech company.
That's still a lot. Four weeks a year?
A quarter has 13 weeks, so if you do 2 week sprints and align them to start with a quarter, there is 1 week per quarter that is not accounted for. That week can be used for stuff outside of daily activities. It can be used for training, offsites, working on a pet project, etc. Its a good way to build time in the schedule for this type of thing. These types of breaks have tremendous long term value.
I have a designated-remote job, but I'm also in a role that's periodically customer-facing. For accounting purposes, the time I spend working from home in my home office is considered 'remote' and my time on-site at customer premises is considered an off-site event. Not sure how they do it at Dropbox, but that gives you an idea of how the time categorization goes.
An offsite event doesn’t have to be expensive. Some are travel and hotel junkets but others are just meetings at some location that isn’t the office - it might even be the office of wither company that lends you space. I’ve seen companies trade this favor back and forth. The only real requirement is that you get out of the ordinary space and routine of work so you can focus completely on the people you are with and what you’re talking about.
Might have to block this bot if it posts puff piece CEO bullshit under the guise of “technology.”
Honestly you can probably block businessInsider as a whole.
The site really went to shit a few years ago
We can do that on Lemmy? How?
At least on sync you can. It's under filters.
I guess it makes sense that Dropbox in particular would be cool about this.
Good to see them walk the talk. Zoom, on the other hand, has an identity crisis it needs to reconcile. It’s hard to convince companies they can rely on remote work with video conferencing software if Zoom won’t do it themselves.
Idiots.
But apparently zoom isn't? Lol
Why do people care so much what these CEOs think. Like outside of how they might change the laws to do with their industry they are in, why do people care so much about and hang on everything they say and do, doesn't innovation come from thinking differently and not just doing it because a successful CEO said so. Take games for example has a random Minecraft, flappy bird, or among us clone ever been as successful as the original. Honesty it just brothers me. Especially the Elon Musk worshippers.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Drew Houston, the CEO of the file-storage company Dropbox, is continuing to tout a predominantly remote work culture, even as business leaders increasingly call for their workers to return to the office.
The San Francisco-based company — which had more than 3,000 employees before a round of layoffs — doesn't require its workers to be present in the office.
They're not resources to control,'" Houston told Fortune when asked about what message he had for CEOs who believed in return-to-office mandates.
Dimon — whose company requested some employees to be in the office five days a week and was tracking attendance by monitoring ID swipes — told the Economist in July: "I completely understand why someone doesn't want to commute an hour and a half every day, totally got it.
"Obviously the company wants to spin it really positively," a former employee who left in 2021 told Insider, adding that virtual-first meant fewer options for people who enjoyed going into the office.
Dropbox and Houston did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Insider, sent outside regular business hours.
The original article contains 382 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I feel like this bot should include the full quote when it sees quatation marks. Here’s the full quote from Dimon(JP Morgan)
Dimon — whose company requested some employees to be in the office five days a week and was tracking attendance by monitoring ID swipes — told the Economist in July: "I completely understand why someone doesn't want to commute an hour and a half every day, totally got it. Doesn't mean they have to have a job here either."
Seriously. That last bit totally changed what he really meant.
These summary bots are pretty shit. I find they leave out heaps of context and just make me click on the article.