this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
397 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
5315 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 120 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Great, now we have disposable automobiles.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already are disposable I got news for you.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure cars are some of the most reused, repaired, and recycled products we have.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 year ago

The vehicles will be much cheaper to make. A shame costs savings will leave out the consumer and also cause all vehicle insurance rates to go way up.

[–] ExtraPartsLeft@kbin.social 108 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This article is misleading. If a car crash is bad enough that it damages the frame of a car, it's going to get totalled anyway. So either way it's going to go to a junk yard and get slowly parted out.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. These cast parts take up a lot more area. They will get damaged much more frequently than a frame being damaged.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lots of 'totaled' cars that still function fine get shipped to other countries with less picky used car markets too.

[–] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I once took a taxi in Addis Ababa that had slicks and a view of the road under the car. Very fancy.

[–] Critical_Insight@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Not necessarily. On some vehicles the exterior panels are part of the frame and you may only have cosmetic damage but fixing it would costs tens of thousands.

[–] Chunk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not true. Some idiot t boned me and they had to replace the frame of my car. It cost her $7k and my car is worth about twice that today.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 9 points 1 year ago

You can contest that you were not fully reimbursed for the expense/what you have received in not equivalent in value to what you had.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 79 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Manufacturers are joining the era of disposable cars.

Consumers are joining the era of disposing of cars.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Many consumers treat their cars as disposable already

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll be honest, they are?

There is no affordable car today that you can make any money today that you need to use. They require money in order to maintain it well enough to use.

Tires are expensive. Gas is expensive. You've got filters and oils and fluids to replace, and headlamps. Without the required disposables, a car is basically useless.

A house without running water, or power, or natural gas, or a furnace filter, or water softener, or lightbulbs, or toilet paper, etc. still provides shelter without all of those things.

A car gets you from point a to point b until it doesn't. At that point it's disposed of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Reject modernity, revert to Swedish brick car.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ironically cars are far more reliable now than they were at any point in the past.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will reduce costs for toyota.

I doubt the consumers will see any savings.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

C level executives will have big fat bonuses tho

[–] PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As mentioned in another thread, there is a paintless dent repair video on YT of a fix done to the corner of a Rivian rear bumper

The owner claimed that he was quoted $41K. To do the work, they would need to cut the body all the way up to the front of the roof

The PDR fix was close to perfect in this case

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Enshitification has infected Toyota. What a shame.

Just another brand I can start avoiding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Impossible seems a bit dramatic. Cost prohibitive is more better

[–] there1snospoon@ttrpg.network 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If it is cost prohibitive for a majority, then it’s pretty damn near impossible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

This bit does not ring true:

Such a scenario would be to Toyota's benefit however, as an unrepairable car will still need replacement—potentially with a new car. Repairability is something the automotive industry has directly combated in recent years, with a Toyota-backed industry group sponsoring a scare campaign to (unsuccessfully) undermine a right-to-repair bill. Car companies make their money from selling new cars, not keeping old ones on the road. If cast bodies serve that end better than those stitched together, it'd be no surprise to see them become the industry standard.

Car companies need their cars to hold their value secondhand so that the people who buy their new cars can afford to replace them more often. The right to repair stuff is about forcing people to use their dealerships for repairs.

No idea what Toyota's plan is for body repairs but destroying their second-hand market is probably not a part of it.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Also, don't car manufacturers have ridiculous margins on original spare parts? I thought they made a lot of money on those over the pretty long lifetime of the vehicles.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I mean the main advantages for Toyota are clear and massive. Huge cuts in assembly time and factory floor space. Any effect on the second hand market is likely not intended, but also almost certainly worth the savings made, as far as they're concerned.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] thejml@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have a large cast part you could do the same thing as you do with a frame or body panel now. As long as there’s a replacement cast part ready, it is lots of work in some cases, so it’s less “impossible to repair” and more accurately “cost prohibitive to repair”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Has anyone come up with a guess on the cost of swapping out an entire cast body section vs replacing or refurbishing the parts that would be there without the cast?

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think point is without the cast body section you could just replace broken parts which may be significantly less. In practice though I don't think it matters that much. Small accidents hopefully don't damage the frame and if they do it's often a bit dubious repairing it.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Yeah, I think once you get to the point where the car needs the frame worked on, it's probably going to get scrapped whether it has a cast frame or not.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

.. on a 1st world country.

we definetly do those kinds of repairs over here

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Article does not have the numbers, and I filled in DDGing the Numbers. How many cars have their frames repaired each year?

My anecdotal experience indicates very few car frames are repaired each year, though not zero.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The expense of repairing frame damage is already really high and, in my personal experience with a couple cars that had frame damage from being hit, the insurance counts it as a total loss every time. I don't suspect the average car owner is going to repair that kind of damage when it would be cheaper to just replace the entire vehicle. An enthusiast or someone with a sentimental bond with it, and has the money for it, might choose to repair it tho.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Toyota has fallen, billions must ride horses

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Guess I won't be sticking with Toyota when my Prius finally craps out. Too bad. It's a great car.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Gigacasting saves car companies money, it doesn't save car owners money. For the manufacturer it reduces their bill of materials and time take to assemble a vehicle. They might save a couple of hundred bucks. Possibly.

For the owner, it increases the risk that a small collision runs a fracture along the body of their car which is then basically impossible to repair and the entire vehicle is a writeoff. Castings could potentially have sacrificial points where some kinds of damage could be ground off and replaced with stamped metal but even if that were so, it's still less repairable than if the entire frame of the car were assembled of stamped metal.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

this is just more outsourcing the costs onto the public and privatizing the profits for short term gain, they're hoping the entire industry folds in on this but I am absolutely not buying a car where some asshole bumping into my parked car will result in me having to replace the whole front third.

[–] xkforce@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

All according to kaikaku

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What will EU do?

Coz they gptta do something at some point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Good luck getting comprehensive car insurance.

load more comments
view more: next ›