this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
355 points (100.0% liked)

196

16504 readers
3871 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's pretty disrespectful to imply that ace people aren't fully human imo

[–] kotauskas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

asexual ≠ has no sex drive

[–] H_is_for_hedgehog@mander.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Asexual = no sexual attraction (I think)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's.... complicated according to them.

As a bi man, I'm used to being erased and don't want to do it to the ace homies, but I have to admit when some of the crowd are going on about how they're "aroace with sexual impulses" I'm pretty tempted, because it sure sounds like they're saying they want minority status for hitting and quitting.

thank you for putting in the effort to even think about the ace homies lol. it was actually really refreshing to see it even brought up in this thread since it isn't talked about a lot!

from what i've read it can vary a lot from person to person, and it is a spectrum. in my experience i can compare it to aphantasia, where i haven't experienced this thing that many people consider central to their lives and those around them but it really hasn't affected me in a negative way that i can perceive. as i understand it, asexuality is purely the lack of sexual attraction, and theres plenty more words to further specify where people fall on the spectrum if you want to look it up.

i think a lot of the "iffy" ace identification/definition you can read about online simply comes from it being so hard to prove the absence of a thing, when the opposite can be so easy.

[–] SolarNialamide@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

So, I'm not completely ace, but I am 95% and seemingly get more ace every year that goes by. Thing is, there's a difference between sexual impulse and arousal on one hand and attraction to an actual person on the other. I get horny as hell every single month during my ovulation because my uterus is screaming and begging me to make babies, and that's usually when my once or twice a month masturbation happens. But the last time I met an actual real life person I was sexually attracted to was 4 years ago.

I can also find the idea of a person sexually arousing, but still won't find the actual person attractive. I know this from experience, because when I was much younger and didn't know myself as well I did act on the attraction to the idea of a person only to be sorely disappointed when it actually happened and I felt nothing.

This is only my own experience of course, but I hope this helps a bit in understanding it.

[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

If you don’t reproduce on your own, you’re not truly asexual. #mitosis

[–] Zimmy@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Jesus was a serial masterbator

[–] njinx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Catholic church isn't exactly the most LGBTQ-friendly organization

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

I feel like the ace theory makes the most sense imo

[–] DearAll@beehaw.org 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Asexual people are fully human though

[–] juliebean@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

not to catholics

[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago

I was about to say asexual people, but catholics don't believe in those

[–] SqueakyBeaver@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Me, an asexual person: Fuck yeah I'm not fully human

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

happy adeptus mechanicus noises

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Probably ass: it’s well known that Christ broke up buns into fish to feed the crowd at the sermon on the mount - a subtle metaphor for cumming to the butt

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

I think Jesus was an eyes guy. He said eyes are the windows to the soul after all.

But then again he might have been a little bit into feet with all the feet washing and everything.

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He had a big tiddy hooker gf, you can’t tell me Jesus didn’t have sexual temptations

Insert Robert Langdon speech about the Catholic smear campaigns of Mary.

...

I think Lemmy is an old enough crowd to get the reference, right?

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correct answer: Boobs didn't exist until Eve so obviously ass. Boobs are just front facing asses after all.

[–] NotAnonymousAtAll@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The obvious answer, especially for anyone who already believes multiple things can be true at the same time:

"Why not both?"

[–] overkill0485@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I need a Jesus Loves Bimbos sticker, stat.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

My impression is he was totally banging Mary Magdalene, and that just was just omitted. If he was like any other popular cult leader, he also got his pick of the young women among the followers.

It would have been regarded as peculiar and noticeable if Jesus didn't partake of the groupies.

Maybe he had erectile dysfunction