this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
125 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Rep. Jim Jordan both jumped into the race Wednesday to become the next House speaker, setting up a fight to replace Kevin McCarthy after his historic ouster.

House Republicans are even more bitterly divided in the aftermath of House Speaker Kevin McCarthy’s ouster and his decision not to run again. It remains to be seen whether the conference can coalesce around a viable successor to the California Republican.

The stakes are extremely high as Congress faces down a looming shutdown deadline in mid-November. The House is essentially paralyzed while it lacks a speaker.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Jim Jordan the famous pervert enabler? Surely, that couldn’t be who Matt Gaetz wants as speaker.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Carrying on Hastert's tradition of pedo GOP speakers.

[–] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Birds of a feather, of course.

[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shit birds of a shit feather flock together, Rander-bo-banders.

[–] Lenny@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Beware my friend, shit winds are a coming.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jim Jordan? Is that the same Jim Jordan that covered up multiple rapes?

[–] jerome@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
[–] nerrad@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

Gym Jordan. The guy with absolutely no empathy or ability to compromise. May as well close up Washington DC and everyone just go home.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Isn't Jim Jordan known to be an ass on a level Trump gave him a medal for it?

And that's not even getting started about his history in Ohio covering for pedos.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

May their Republican brethren treat whoever "wins" with the same level of respect, professionalism, and admiration as the last 3 Republican speakers.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Least Objectionable Sleazeball for Speaker!!

Or LOSS for short.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Is this...?

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

It will be okay. Rep. Boebert has offered to lend a hand if needed.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Oh Gymmie, do you really want more national attention?

Who am I kidding, off course he does.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Oklahoma Rep. Kevin Hern, who chairs a conservative group known as the Republican Study Committee said Wednesday he is still looking at running for speaker and has not made a decision yet.

Potential contenders who are said to be interested for whip: Rep. Drew Ferguson of Georgia, who lost and ran last time, or Rep.

House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik is also calling colleagues and allies about potentially moving up the chain in leadership, a source familiar said.

Jordan made a pitch for unity in a letter to House GOP colleagues obtained by CNN.

As speaker, McCarthy presided over a narrow majority and had to confront criticism from hardline conservatives, who threw up roadblocks to the leadership agenda and protested legislation that passed with Democratic support.

His ouster, led by GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, came soon after he averted a government shutdown by passing a bipartisan stopgap funding bill.


The original article contains 630 words, the summary contains 152 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wanted McCarthy to run again just as a fuck-you to Gaetz. I suppose I'll go on record saying this won't take 15 rounds.=

[–] Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean... members can still nominate him... and he is known to go back on what he's said in the recent past when it suits him anyway ...

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

On the other hand, him not running again is a big "fuck you" to them, too, because while I think he's a terrible person, he was the one politician both sides could kind of coalesce around. Now that he's gone, it's highlighted the absolute chaos that exists between the Fascism Caucus and the moderate Republicans, since they really can't agree who should be next.

Either way, I can't imagine it's endearing to their moderate supporters, and they need them in the next election; the crazies might be reliable, but they're too small of a bloc on their own.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there any path were a Democrat becomes speaker?

[–] Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Republicans hold a slim majority, so it would only take a few flips to elect Jeffries as speaker. Whether any republicans are upset enough to flip is anyone's guess.

[–] Can_you_change_your_username@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If any Republicans want to talk it doesn't absolutely have to be Jeffries. He is the Democrats first choice but they are the minority party and may be willing to give a little for a coalition that elects a Democrat as speaker.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Given the chaos of getting mccarthy appointed, and the likelihood that no speaker will make concessions to the freedom caucus after what just happened, I'm actually kinda pulling for a few flips. Probably won't happen, but after another 15 votes who knows?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, things are in such disarray, Dem's might be able to slip AOC through in the confusion.

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Scalise is probably mature enough to handle the job, but holy shit...Gym Jordan!? Hard pass.

[–] ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They all suck, but bow-tie guy who is currently filling in the position seems like one of the less crazy options (despite kicking Pelosi out of her office).

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

So CNN is claiming that the House is paralyzed while NBC is claiming the opposite. They can't both be right, so what is going on?