this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
-21 points (30.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43901 readers
1968 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the context of VPNs for example. Some VPNs store and provide information about what sites you go to third parties. Third parties analyze it and figure out what adds to show you. Hmm... then let them show me those adds they want to show me. I do hate adds as a whole and use an add blocker, thus. But I couldn't care less what particular type of adds they show me, they are still adds.

Someone knows what sites I go, what then. If someone curiously inquired me on this type of information I'd tell them without giving a second thought. Incomparably larger amount of data I put out just by making comments and posts.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blargerer@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You are thinking way too small about what can be done with that amount of data on you. I'll give you an example. I once did some programming work for a website. The website got 'hacked' (An administrative admin had their password guessed because they weren't using good password habits). This website had poor security and with the admins password the 'hacker' was able to get a DB dump. Bad stuff. So me and another guy set out trying to identify who had done it. Via server logs we were pretty sure we had correctly tied the 'hacker' to a user of the site. By looking at their activity on the site, and what referral links they had followed to get to the site previous, we learned where they approximately lived and their first name. But we knew we needed more info than that, so we looked at his hobbies and figured out he liked pokemon quite a lot. We then created a 'what pokemon are you' quiz, asking mostly unimportant questions, but throwing in a couple we needed in order to be able to report him to his local authorities (IE their last name and some other info I can't remember off the top of my head). We then had this quiz get posted by an account not associated with the running of the site. the 'hacker' filled it out, and we reported him for breaking the law with our evidence to his local authorities.

So to reiterate, 2 idiots with no background in data science and like 16 hour between us, were able to manipulate an arbitrary guy into doing what we wanted because of a relatively small amount of data. Now Imagine what people dedicating their lives to this stuff can do to you.

[–] Elevator7009@kbin.cafe 3 points 1 year ago

I probably should care about what big companies are doing with my data, but honestly I feel I’ll just be one more person in a group of a million. Companies won’t care.

What I’m scared of is stuff like the example above. A dedicated person trying to connect my online identity to my real-life one.

[–] Lowered_lifted@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LMAO they really answered one of those password reset answer phishing ass quizzes? Lucky for you they were not sending their best.

[–] blargerer@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Although they were the target, they were far from the only person to fill it out. Context can make people drop their guards. But yes, not some criminal mastermind. Of course, again, I'm some idiot programmer not a genius forensic computer detective.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] httpjames@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

What if you were a woman who had a miscarriage and the trackers got ahold of that information from your search and browsing habits on planned parenthood (which has a LOT of third party trackers and cookies)? Would you like to see ads of what could have been your baby for eternity?

This information could be sold to insurance providers and your premiums could go up since you’re more of a “health risk”.

There are endless avenues where your data could end up and affect your life in the real world.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Now imagine that data is bought by local law enforcement from the lowest bidder data broker.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that local law enforcement is based in an abortion-illegal state and now you're under arrest for suspicions on aborting your baby

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Yes that is the implication

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do people close the toilet door ?

[–] Pantoffel@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Literally. The moment someone wants to have a look at my anus, I'd already have shown them. What's the deal with everyone? We need to be more transparent with these kind of topics. Nobody wants to share anymore. We are all walled off behind our smartphones and doors and houses.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly, this is a bad analogy. I close the door because other people don't want to see me, not because I don't want other people to see me.

[–] Hazrod@jlai.lu 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me it's the fact that this entire industry runs on information gathered about me. I don't like to be their currency and so try to hide from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Online privacy is not something that anyone should take lightly. It is a matter of protecting personal data and one's human rights. Personal data can include anything that identifies you or reveals something about you (e.g. your health records, browsing history, etc.). This data can be - and is - collected, stored, analyzed, and often sold by third parties without your consent or knowledge. This in turn can lead to serious consequences for you.

To name just two examples. Advertisers can use your personal data to target you with ads that manipulate your behavior or preferences. Governments can use your personal data to monitor your activities or censor your opinions. The very fact that you post this question under an alias and not your real name makes the point that you value your online privacy.

In line with that, online privacy allows you to express yourself freely and access information without censorship or surveillance. Online privacy is a human right that we should respect and defend. It is essential for social justice and human dignity. Without online privacy, we cannot enjoy the benefits of the internet as a platform for open communication, education and sometimes innovation. We cannot participate freely in online communities, share our ideas, learn new things, or explore new possibilities. We cannot challenge the status quo, expose corruption, or demand accountability. Many might not be able to be themselves, without fear or shame.

In my opinion, we should use encryption tools, trustworthy VPNs, secure browsers, and other methods to safeguard our personal data from prying eyes. We should also support and listen to organizations that advocate for privacy rights and fight against online privacy violations.

It matters, because it is our right and - frankly - our responsibility.

Forgive the rant... this topic is important to me.

TL;DR Online privacy is important, because it protects our personal data and our human rights from misuse by third parties. It also enables us to express ourselves and access information freely on the internet.


Edit: added last sentence of second paragraph

Edit 2: fixed some grammar

[–] Gadg3tm@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I'm not a commodity, I'm not a product, don't trade my shit. Simple as that.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You'd tell them because the law might not consider your activities illegal at this time. But what about trans kids? What about people who have abortions? Unfortunately, we can't trust any state or legal system to continue to have our best interests in mind.

Better that we normalize a free and private internet now while we still have the privilege of saying "I'd tell them..." And if you'd tell them, then great! But that should be your choice, your agency. It shouldn't be data that we expect to have collated about us just by visiting a site online.

[–] Pantoffel@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

cough freedom of choice cough. I choose not to allow freedom of choice.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Your honor, I deny this person their right to liberty on the grounds that I am able to profit by restricting it."

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

"I will not tolerate attempts to stif-"

waves a bundle of 500$ bills

[–] Elevator7009@kbin.cafe 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m cool with telling people in real life almost anything about me sans my SSN and passwords. I don’t consider any of it personal and have probably too much trust in random strangers.

I still recognize others might not be like me, and don’t shame them for their choice to not share details they consider personal. Even if it’s something like what their favorite food is. A little weird in my opinion, but I’m still not entitled to that information.

I’m also aware of how people can use information against you. I trust you not to go trying to commit identity theft with my birthday and SSN and real name, but a bad actor scraping the web for SSNs totally will. So I have to hide some things. I’m definitely not ashamed I was born on DD-MM-YYYY with the name Firstname Lastname and assigned the SSN 000-00-0000, but I also know people will use this combination of information in order to harm me. Is their intent to hurt me specifically? Probably not, they just want to spend money that is not theirs. Will I get hurt anyways? Yes. And if I’m not careful about it, a lot of other information about me (like my hobbies, the way I type, etc.) can be used to link my online identities together and eventually find one of them that tells you I am Firstname Lastname, and a different online identity that tells you I was born DD-MM-YYYY (I should probably go scrub my birthday off everything). This, even without the SSN, is enough to get you trusted as being me for a lot of things, like when you call into a pharmacy. And I ask the customer service person to pass on my complaint about that about 10% of the times I call into such places where the security should probably be tighter. My SSN might be harder to find because I don’t talk about what it is, but I hear they get bought and sold online pretty often. Some website that did need my SSN gets hacked, and now that’d be ripe for the taking too.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

There's definitely some information that I've shared that is probably not in my best interest, so I understand being the type of person who tells people almost anything. I'm pretty much an open book with close friends and family. It's one reason I like to avoid sites like Facebook and use sites that emphasize anonymity more. Sometimes I have to keep myself safe from myself lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Coworker of mine recently told me that his family's been getting harassed for hush money by some fucker who got his son's personal information after he visited a compromised website.

That's why.

If all you're thinking about are advertisers, as if they're the only ones who can hop on board the online monitoring train, you are missing a huuuuuuge cybersecurity threat.

ETA for anyone who's curious: yes he went to the FBI, don't know if anything's come of it yet

[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The VPN thing really depends on which VPN you are getting. A lot of them prey people's misconceptions like being able to access Netflix content from different regions or being an all in one solution for privacy. A VPN can come in handy if you are connecting to restricted or monitored networks. If you are at work and don't want your boss knowing you spend a quarter of your day watching Twitch streams for example.

My big concern and why I'm so privacy focused is because of what people could do with my data and not having any control over it. There were some third party websites for Reddit where you could enter a username and it would spit out metrics based off of what you've said. One thing it could do was tell you where someone lived. I know someone could go through all my comments and posts manually for any times I slipped up but the ease and automation of it are things I didn't care for. I want to add an extra hurdle.

Data leaks are another big concern because then your information is just out there without even a facade of privacy for anyone to utilize

[–] off_brand_@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

(edit: God I'm sorry about this big ass wall. I ranged and rambled. It's too early to write this much lol. Tl;Dr 1: law enforcement. Police don't need a warrant to buy your info. In the US, we have warrants for a reason. Constitution outlines restrictions on "unreasonable search and seizure. 2: Consent. Like, I should have the right to just say no. It's my data, let me be part of the conversation. 3/4: Safety and equity. It's still illegal to be gay in some parts of the world. An insurance company or an employer could check your race online if they wanted, whether or not you've made that available. )

The problem extends across a few metrics.

First, probably the most tangible. The police can and do use data purchased from civilian companies to bypass regulations. For example, you don't need a warrant to check phone contacts if you can buy it. You might be saying you don't do anything illegal to worry about. Have you ever been to a protest? Have your friends? If climate change bothers you, could you see yourself going to one?

Protests are frequently targeted by law enforcement. Even if you think that would only happen if the protest becomes a riot, you don't control the crowd. If you're there but not rioting, your phone location can be used as proof of participation. There is precedent, too. They used location data to arrest capitol rioters. IMO those were good arrests, but how many BLM protestors were arrested based on phone data?

Second, consent. Even if I change nothing else in your mind here, consider that we might simply value our personal data differently. I should have a right to be part of the conversation about me. Let me pay $20 to use a product without observation. Products should be up front about what is collected too (GDPR has helped lots with website tracking). Facebook is known to collect "shadow profiles", where data is compiled on you even if you aren't on the platform. I should be allowed to say no to that, for any reason, simply by virtue of it being my information.

Third and fourth go together some. Safety and equity. People are still killed for being gay. Legally. And the collection of data on people enables that. Just buy data off of Pornhub to identify who is browsing their gay section. And if someone is found in a country where it is illegal to be queer, all you need is a list of their contacts to find more. Maybe Apple refuses to unlock their phone for you, but that's okay. Just buy their contacts off Meta.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_by_country_or_territory

But that's the straightforward issue of equity. Consider someone who has gone to jail. They've done their time, they've reformed, and now they want to rejoin society. The judge even goes so far as to expunge their records. Well, a background checking company can buy that info still. And that's just talking about criminal acts that should be reformed. Maybe you don't care about that. What about crimes that just target BIPOC? In the US, weed is legalizing, slowly. People were still arrested for it, and that history is indelible, regardless of the official record. If even the US Justice System wants to wipe the slate, than the slate should be wiped.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_in_the_United_States_criminal_justice_system

Special mention to Google btw. Good and bad. They do a lot to tell you what and how they collect data, and how they anonymize it. Purportedly don't sell your data, since they also own the ad network. Like you say, I'm not really worried about the ads, and a lot of their products really are good enough that I don't mind making that trade. However, I do take umbrage with the idea that it's fine still. A company does have analytics on their ad campaigns. John Oliver did a funny bit where they put an ad targeted towards Congress. He got a couple of hits too, with their location and had the power to fingerprint their browsers if he wanted. Once you click an ad, you're in the care of whatever site put that ad out. That means they collect whatever they want on you. Additionally, theyll know what ad brought you in. So if you put an ad out targeting "pregnant people in Texas looking to make a trip", you'll have a list of people that Google thinks match.

This whole post misses a lot of nuance and context. It's a social media post, ultimately. I'm not sure I have enough mental capacity right now to hunt down more links, and I'm about to start my work day. I don't have any trouble with folks who don't care -- frankly I'm jealous. I'm annoyed that I can't just use products like most people and not care. It's just everywhere. Walking down the street I'm on someone's TikTok, meaning Facebook, YT, Bytedance could get my location without me even interacting with them (shadow profiles from earlier). When I got a covid test recently, I had to download their stupid app to fill out a form. That app has the power to collect endless data points about my phone. Buying concert tickets means signing over my information to your favorite ticket vendor. It's just endless and exhausting for me.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you'd phrase this in a less twatty way, you could almost ask this in a "no stupid questions" community.

[–] Elevator7009@kbin.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As another user said, it’s good to ask these questions. We shouldn’t shame people for asking. I’d rather ask a question and look stupid for needing to ask it once, than be ignorant forever. Could they have just searched “why should I care about privacy” online and gotten tons of answers? Yes. I’d also imagine that not everyone grew up with the norm of exhausting all other avenues of information before you ask other people for help.

As for how they asked the question, I’m just reading it as them saying they don’t care about privacy, not that we’re all idiot twats for caring. I think it’s an honest question, not a disingenuous “why does anyone care, you shouldn’t and you’re all stupid if you do.”

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well imagine coming to a vegetarian forum and asking: "Why does everyone make a fuss about killing animals? I eat meat three times every day, go on hunts every month, sometimes just for fun, I don't even eat those animals. Also I don't care about cages and all that, animals don't have souls anyway."

It may also be a genuine question, but sometimes it's good to spend 10 seconds before asking, either by just thinking or maybe do a very brief web search.

In general, questions of the "I don't care about X so I don't see why anyone else could" kind tend to be like that. You can ask, but you can also expect people won't want to talk to you.

[–] Elevator7009@kbin.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I totally get your point about the vegetarian forum and agree with you, but this is c/asklemmy, not c/privacy. I’ve been around the Fediverse long enough to know it’s generally a pro-privacy environment, not everyone else has been.

Again, I’m really not seeing the “I don’t see why anyone else should” part in their question, I suppose we’re interpreting it differently.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My point is that if it's something that clearly lots of people care about, it's probably a good idea to think a little.

The "why anyone would" part is in the "why people make a fuss". I don't wish to be a teacher here picking apart every word, don't get me wrong, but people get upset if you invalidate what they care about. It's like telling someone who's angry to calm down.

Fortunately people here have more patience heh.

[–] Elevator7009@kbin.cafe 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Once I wondered why everyone cared so much about something I didn’t. I wanted to give what seemed like most of the world the benefit of the doubt instead of dismissing their care as invalid and stupid, so I sat and thought about it and came up with a guess.

My guess was way off base. It correctly explained some tertiary aspects of why people cared, but totally missed the primary reasons. And until I had it explained to me, I probably would have continued to miss the primary reasons for my entire life. Sometimes it’s useful to get the answer from the horse’s mouth instead of guessing on your own.

But I definitely understand the bit about people getting upset when the things they care about are invalidated. One of my Things is people just assuming the best of each other or at least not namecalling each other when assuming the best is foolish or impractical, so I reacted to your comment and wondered if I should have because half the time I get a nice exchange like this one we’re having, and half the time I get some condescending, snarky replies. And the condescending replies feel very bad.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand and even appreciate that people have different priorities, worries and preferences. Which is why I dislike the attitude some take, "if you don't care about X, you're part of the problem". It may even be true in lots of cases, but we can't all care about the same things, less we all worry about everything all the time, and that's not good or realistic.

Funny thing though. I've seen people have civil debates about the most sensitive, divisive topics, as long as the initial question or statement comes from a place of genuine curiosity.

But whenever I see people ask the "why is privacy important?" question, it's never just "am I missing something?" but more of a "gimme all the ads, collect everything about me, I don't care", sometimes with the "you conspiracy theorists weirdos, nobody cares about you and you're probably pedos anyway" sprinkled in.

So it's a bit tiring to see this over and over, hence my snark at the beginning. And I don't know where the attitude is coming from. Maybe it's just a relatively new issue and people aren't used to constantly being exposed to the debate, like with some other topics?

But in that case I gather that it should be the opposite problem - we used to have much more privacy than we have now, that just has to be obvious (hence the questions in the first place), so the proper question to ask would be "wait, why is everyone so interested in everything I do all of a sudden? Why is every corporation suddenly collecting all my data and giving me free stuff in return while raking in billions of profits? Hm, sus"

Eh maybe I'm missing something.

[–] Elevator7009@kbin.cafe 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I definitely haven’t seen questions like this asked at all, let alone repeatedly, which is probably where part of my patience comes from.

wait, why is everyone so interested in everything I do all of a sudden? Why is every corporation suddenly collecting all my data and giving me free stuff in return while raking in billions of profits? Hm, sus

This never occurred to me. I found articles about privacy and the risks that were out there as a young child, way before I noticed any kind of change in levels of privacy (didn’t notice any change myself). As a kid I wasn’t aware that certain corporations were making billions, I just enjoyed the free ride and then saw all the articles about privacy risks. And nothing bad ever happened to me and I didn’t see articles about bad things happening to people, so I still didn’t care (after all, I was on Android, I could just… deny this app permission to access something, problem solved! At least that is what I thought) until I saw someone get doxxed. I’m 18+ now, but sometimes you have kids online who don’t obviously seem like kids because you can’t see them online, and thEy Arent TypIng l11k3 dis!!!! or making constant baysic english lenguige missteaks but use regular English at the same level of fluency as adults. If you transplanted my 10-year old personality into a 10-year old today I could easily see them getting on the Fediverse and passing for an adult for awhile, because my 10-year old self spoke and wrote basically the same way I do now, minus the swear words and life experience.

And also, the fact is most people just don’t care about stuff until it affects them or someone close to them. It sounds nasty and I want to be better than this, but the fact remains we all have a limited amount of care and energy to go around. I mostly try to fix my own issues, not exacerbate anyone or dismiss anyone else’s, and help out where I can.

I’d imagine if you’re not in tech circles you also don’t find out much about privacy risks. I really try to extend the benefit of the doubt to people, give a way they could reasonably not know things, because I know I’m arrogant and want to counteract my own “oh my god how do you not know that you fucking idiot lmao I’m so much better and smarter than you” tendencies. And I truly cannot know what things are actually like outside of my experience, at most I can just read about them and get some idea.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

but sometimes you have kids online who don’t obviously seem like kids because you can’t see them

Point taken... Altho personally I don't care about how old someone is. When I game online or just squat on Lemmy/Reddit/forum, I'm fine taking to people whether they're 13 or 70. If anything, younger people tend to be more open minded, which possibly comes with having access to all the information.

But yea I guess some topics probably hit different when you grow up in a certain style of environment. Still, when I babysit kids, I find they are curious about everything and are willing to change their mind if they get explained something realistically. And I don't see younger people ask loaded questions as often as older folks do.

I’d imagine if you’re not in tech circles you also don’t find out much about privacy risks.

I don't begrudge people for not knowing things. What I find interesting is how they react when they learn about something, or their initial train of thought. You probably know the experiment of asking randos "should dihydrohen monoxide be banned?"

I have this hobby almost, I like finding new things, weird and divisive stuff. Oddball topics, weird fetishes, strange habits, crazy hobbies, wild art, whatever. If there's a community with "weird" in the title, I'll probably subscribe to it.

And it also gives me some insight into how outsiders react when they stumble upon that stuff. Most people, when confronted with something out of their ordinary, tend to go "damn good thing I'm normal, everyone is weird" or worse. So I guess it is human nature, but you can also imagine how tiring it can get.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lowered_lifted@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Your data can and will be used against you, by people who want to exploit you. Owning your data is protecting your assets.

[–] mtset@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

If someone curiously inquired me on this type of information I’d tell them without giving a second thought.

This is the difference between you and people who care about their privacy, then. I would happily talk about that to someone I trusted, but not a random person on the street, and certainly not someone whose interests I know don't align with mine, which is mostly true of every company on Earth. Not to mention that any of these companies could be subpoenaed for this information at any time, which would be an issue if the law changed to make something I do illegal.

[–] pavnilschanda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not too vocal when it comes to privacy but I will tell you that I really don't like how algorithms take data and use them in order to manipulate the masses. It just seems very controlling, like you're being controlled by a clairvoyant puppetmaster.

[–] RovingFox@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Selling bad products to customers is about finding just the right amount of inconvenience for the customer. You never know what information about you can be used by an AI model to pinpoint your threshold. I would like not to be used in a borderline consumer herding.

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What if some do not want to share this type of information without giving it a second thought?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean the “P” in VPN stands for “private”. One would hope that carries some actual meaning.

If you’re so willing to give up your privacy then that’s your call. Some of us cherish our privacy and our freedom and don’t want corporations or the government being able to easily know anything about us without our explicit consent, if at all possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need privacy for piracy or you'll get a penalty.

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's like my Netflix subscription. Its enough to stop angry letters from the local natzi monopoly.

load more comments
view more: next ›