A federal judge in Texas
Conservatives always know they'll get a favorable ruling in the fifth circuit. So they always bring their favorite causes there.
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
40 points (91.7% liked)
News
23295 readers
5390 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Not only that, but it was the same judge, Judge Andrew Hanen.
Anyone able to find how it actually violated APA?
A conservative judge didn't like it.
So, on a surface level, that wasn't the finding. This ruling amounts to finding that the current DACA is not substantively different from an earlier version the same court previously found illegal and ordered changes to. Since it hasn't changed, it is still illegal. That's why it's so difficult to answer your question: the real answer lies in the previous case (or cases; I think it's two, one named Texas and one named Regents), not this one.
IIRC he ruled last time that it didn't undergo the proper public notice and comment period originally. They basically drafted up the same regulations, put it through the public notice and comment period, didn't change anything based on public comments and now he struck it because it was exactly the same regulations as before.
Judge Andrew Hanen, Republican, appointed by G.W. Bush, who received his law degree from Baylor, ruled as expected.
Nothing to see here, move on.
Unless you're one of the people who's supposed to be protected by DACA. In that case moving on is kind of hard.