this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
878 points (97.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17295 readers
448 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 287 points 1 year ago (71 children)

/c/fuckcars : "use some other form of transportation!"

Also /c/fuckcars: "No! Not like that!"

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You won't commute with a plane like this lol.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (70 replies)
[–] IanAtCambio@lemm.ee 98 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Little known fact. Airplanes still use leaded fuel. I’ll bet that the blood levels for all of these families are elevated. Not a great place to raise a kid.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Clarification: Only piston aircraft require leaded fuel. Which is unfortunately a pretty big part of the general aviation market, but similarly sized turboprops do also exist (though are more expensive) and it doesn't apply to modern commercial aviation at all.

[–] Fox@pawb.social 47 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Further clarification: Only gasoline powered aircraft without the Auto Fuel STC require leaded fuel.

Although, there is an initiative underway to fully phase out leaded avgas. G100UL is the FAA approved formulation. Exciting time and long overdue.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

There are also some plans in the works to fully end leaded avgas in the 2030s.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, and the FAA is taking it's sweet time to approve a new unleaded fuel for general aviation that shows a lot of promise called G100UL. It's estimated it could take another 6-9 years. Otherwise it's currently only approved for specific planes and not available at most airports and aerodromes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is like looking at a yet to be made Tom Scott video.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He already did make a video on it lol

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Tom scott has made a video on everything, including this very thread.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] awake01@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

http://www.casadeaero.net/text/about.php

Many pilots do this as a means of reducing the costs associated with operating out of areas with high hangar and service costs. This is Northwest of Chicago near Rockford. The about page explains a lot of the obvious questions.

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Fascinating. Thanks for sharing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Quills@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This exists?! Oh my That's not just mildly, it's really interesting!

[–] UFO64@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

They are somewhat common-ish if you know where to look. I fly by one a lot!

https://mapio.net/images-p/101437851.jpg

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The smell and noise would be unbearable.

[–] Leeps@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

It's obviously for plane nerds that won't mind.

[–] nyoooom@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Depends, looks like small planes, and even if 10 come and go everyday you would quickly stop hearing them at all (the brain is very good at ignoring useless stimuli)

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Studies to highway and airport neighbourhoods say otherwise.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See, there are some weird types like me who actually like the smell of 100LL, and don't mind plane noise. I'd live there. But yeah, it's definitely not for everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"honey, Joe's wife is sick, can you take care of control tower duty today?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And they can't even afford an HOA to water the grass by the runway.

[–] wieson@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Serisin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

It has what plants need

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I want to see a train-based one of these

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone parks their personal train in their yard?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Yeah, or at least train cars, with a way to get it onto the network for vacations and such. (Vacationing in a personal train car sounds fun)

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a lot leaded fuel to be inhaling everyday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otacon239@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a friend who lives in one of these neighborhoods but right in the middle of a city. Blows my mind that it was there the whole time and I just never noticed until I went to his house.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ieightpi@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is quite interesting. but also these fuckers are pretentious

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

There are a bunch of these around. In my old city we had two nearby. One was nice kind of like this, one was just a grass field out by cornfields.

load more comments
view more: next ›