this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
324 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
6308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 87 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Some things just shouldn't be connected to the internet.

[–] BurntPunk@kbin.social 70 points 1 year ago

~~Some~~ MOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.

FTFY

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago

Apparently I'm one of those things. Jesus, what an article

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately connecting this kink to the internet facilitates doing it. Having the device itself connect for ease of use had caused an unbelievable amount of tech issues, though. To be fair the programmer is a dipshit, though.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that just makes connecting those things to the internet forbidden... and therefore alluring.

[–] reflex@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 10 points 1 year ago

...provides the most complete remote sex solution for the Internet and corporate intranet.

Lol ha ha

[–] BurntPunk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

~~Some~~ Most things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.

FTFY

[–] ExplosiveLynx@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago

That thumbnail is A+

[–] riskable@programming.dev 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,

10,000 users‽

[–] nxfsi@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao

[–] PeachMan@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

We live in the weirdest timeline

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Better than having it locked on I suppose...

[–] iByteABit@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your cock is mine now

I'm dying

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

That probably worked for most of the clientele.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it's more of a service.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 year ago

That would be non-consensual.

[–] Sdnimm543@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll be honest, not the worst possible issue with a smart chastity cage that I could think of.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is when I lock your shit remotely and then change the password

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TFW chinese hackers hold your dick for ransom until you send them crypto

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

At least someone other than me is holding my dick.

[–] yukichigai@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

This exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users, thanks to two vulnerabilities.

He also reached out to the company on June 17 alerting them of the issues in an attempt to get them to fix the vulnerabilities and protect their users’ data, according to a screenshot of the email he sent and shared with TechCrunch.

[REDACTED] has left the site wide open, allowing any script kiddie to grab any and all customer information.

“Your cock is mine now,” the hacker told one of the victims, according to a researcher who discovered the hacking campaign at the time.

In 2016, researchers found a bug in a Bluetooth-powered “panty buster,” which allowed anyone to control the sex toy remotely over the internet.

In 2017, a smart sex toy maker agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by two women who alleged the company spied on them by collecting and recording “highly intimate and sensitive data” of its users.


The original article contains 702 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] lemann@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, no, no, no. No. Surely the hacker knows the victim probably did not see that comment as a threat 😭

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sign up for the cage, get a bonus dom!

[–] BastianAI@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And to think I don't even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV...

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 1 points 1 year ago

Why oh why can one no longer buy a dumb TV?! Do companies just not make them anymore?!

The chastity belt may be smart, but the maker never claimed to be so.

[–] dion_starfire@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If this is the same one I remember from a couple years back, what's not listed in this article: two different security teams warned them of the vulnerabilities multiple times, the vendor claimed to have fixed the issue when they hadn't, the devices didn't have any sort of physical bypass in case of malfunction, and what finally convinced the pen testers to go public was the company announcing that they planned to make a locking inflatable butt plug using the same platform.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

It's a new story, and the article doesn't reveal the company... but... we all know which one it is.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

for people with a penis

So, men?

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] azulavoir@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if the ratio of trans women to men in the audience of this product was a lot higher than in the general population.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's that problem you were asking for. Hope you love it!

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Thoth19@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

People who buy chastity cages presumably want someone to lick them in it and refuse to let them out ... like the hacker was doing to them.

[–] some_guy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Ah yeah see you knew what they meant. What’s the issue?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

God i hope the users used a email alias and fake names

load more comments
view more: next ›