If my goal was to kill exclusively enemy combatants and leave all civilians alone, it would be pretty effective to round them up and gas them, yes. I'd rather do that than indiscriminate fire.
Yes, because that's exactly what the thread is about. Making assumptions about control flow.
Since Jimmy Carter, I'd imagine
There's a mall near where I live that's still pretty rad. I go there sometimes
I work with two guys named Hunter and they're very cool
And you can't spell unfortunate without tuna. But not every problem is caused by canned fish.
wii homebrew developer maybe?
Sure, convince the DNC that a progressive should be on their ballot, so we can vote for them and not waste it instead of senile men fighting for scraps.
The system needs to be gently brought to its knees before we can remove its head.
It could also be, perhaps, someone's given name before adoption gave them a new one. Or perhaps a meddling relative suggested a "better" name, and then the person went back to the one they were born with, leaving the relative's name idea dead.
It's not trans-exclusive (I fall into the latter category I mentioned) but it's definitely a mostly trans concept
Animal abusers aren't furries. Conflating them is unhealthy for both
I get it but only because of balatro
Almost all of these, with one exception, are real pieces of information about this quirky little 3DS / Mobile puzzle game.
It's pretty effective when your attacker doesn't want to harm innocents at any cost, at least. But most organizations going to war don't care enough.