this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
231 points (93.6% liked)

Funny

6627 readers
424 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

Please don't

[–] WtfEvenIsExistence@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Pretty sure that's "vote manipulation"

[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's self-promotion and is taught at all the top MBA schools.

[–] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Indeed. Flattery by proxy is the key to many sales techniques

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here's the thing. You said a "jackdaw is a crow"

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The prodigal son returns!

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

It was the wild west times for the internet.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fundamentally, though, how can it be stopped? The two instance administrators can only see part of what's happening, and can't directly determine that the votes are coming from two alts of the same user. Maybe over enough times, the patterns can be guessed at with heuristics, but this kind of vote manipulation is going to be a problem for federated communities. Especially if we don't get better moderation tools developed.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this kind of vote manipulation is going to be a problem for federated communities

This is not exclusive to federated communities. Reddit has vote manipulation too.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit does have vote manipulation, but reddit admins can easily see much stronger indicators of the same person behind multiple user accounts: Server logs of user agent, IP address, interface/API key, script support and activity that tends to give away browser type and history, etc.

Most of that information is only available to instance admins, so admins of one instance can't see when external votes are coming in from the same users who already voted using accounts on your instance.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most of that information is only available to instance admins, so admins of one instance can’t see when external votes are coming in from the same users who already voted using accounts on your instance.

Admins can see how users vote, even external users. So it's no different from local users on the same instance (which would be how reddit operates). So I don't see how this is different.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The instance I'm logged into doesn't forward my user agent, IP address, or CSS/script support (or other fingerprinting techniques) to the other instance. Everything I do in a community hosted on another instance is forwarded through my instance server as a middleman, and I never directly connect to the other instance server.

The admins of an instance (or reddit) might be able to analyze server logs of different users on their own instance to be able to determine those things, but can't apply that analysis to accounts from other instances, whose interaction with the server doesn't actually include a login or any direct connections to the server they administer. All they have to go on is the ActivityPub logs, which won't include that fingerprinting information.

[–] WtfEvenIsExistence@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the mechanism by which an admin would be able to tell if one user voted more than once on the same post? Instance admins can't see the votes of the accounts on other instances.

[–] WtfEvenIsExistence@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Admins can see all votes of users on their instance, as well as all voter's usernames on a post located in a community that's on that instance. So if they get suspicious amount of votes from a user on another user's post, they might consider that vote manipulation and ban either the voter, or poster, or both. (Although, banning a poster for receiving suspicious amount of votes can lead to wrongful ban, since someone could just make random alts to consistently upvote someone they hate in attempt to ban them.)

The admins probably saw suspicious votes and banned those users.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WtfEvenIsExistence@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And nothing of consequence was lost.

Enjoying my time here but an account means nothing, social media means nothing.

I haven't found the need to make more accounts (lemm.ee is great), but I wonder what other gbu's are up to

[–] teft@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago

Oh look, it's the new Unidan.

[–] baggachipz@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh wow this is great

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

"This guy has the right idea."

[–] mihnt@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

I'll do this if it's important information that needs to be shared and seen by more people. Otherwise I don't bother. I'm not in it for the doots. I'm here for the community.