this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
96 points (96.2% liked)

politics

18904 readers
4312 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Live updates from the Republican debate courtesy of USA Today if you don't want to give Fox the views.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yolobrolofosholo@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My favorite part is how they keep talking about how dangerous China is, then they keep showing tik Tok ads

[–] BrickTamland@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Fuckin A right, the limits of hypocrisy know no bounds

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

“We need education in this country, not indoctrination in this country,” Ron DeSantis said.

Says the one who is at the forefront of indoctrination in schools.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we talk about how most of them are arguing against education??

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

It's active hostility to higher education from those on the right, because once you're college educated, you tend to be more left leaning.

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/

"Highly educated adults – particularly those who have attended graduate school – are far more likely than those with less education to take predominantly liberal positions across a range of political values. And these differences have increased over the past two decades.

More than half of those with postgraduate experience (54%) have either consistently liberal political values (31%) or mostly liberal values (23%), based on an analysis of their opinions about the role and performance of government, social issues, the environment and other topics. Fewer than half as many postgrads – roughly 12% of the public in 2015– have either consistently conservative (10%) or mostly conservative (14%) values. About one-in-five (22%) express a mix of liberal and conservative opinions."

[–] zorb@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Holy shit! This is clown shoes. As expected, but seriously wow.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is clown shoes plus the honking horn and squirting flower...

"After I gave myself to Jesus Christ ..."

Sadly, Nikki Haley looks sane, and that is baffling to me ...

Also, how is this being run like an NFL game??

[–] zorb@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same here. Finding myself agreeing with Nikki Haley for a moment there made me realize how far right they’ve gone. I know it’s the republican primary, but… sheesh

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Its like Bizarro World.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Also, how is this being run like an NFL game??

Mostly for the advertisements.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

"I want to see how people conduct themselves" says the voter whose top choices are Donald Trump and Ronald DeSantis.

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Consensus is the opposite of leadership" eeesh Mike. So if 60% of America agrees, the leaderlike thing to do is argue with them?

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It does seem to be a very undemocratic statement, doesn't it? Par for the GOP course.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Its not just drugging people up with Zoloft and Seroquel"

What.

The.

Actual.

Fuck.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 1 year ago

Suspiciously specific denial is suspicious.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"Drill, frack, burn coal and pursue nuclear."

Oy.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago

I'm donating to the Biden campaign in honor of the Republicans climate positions

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always hate when nuclear is dumped in with fossil fuels.

The fossil fuel industry has been hamstringing nuclear since the 50s. (the Rockefeller Foundation did some "research" on the safe doses of radiation in the 50s, and then lied and said that there was no safe dose, even though we all swim through a safe dose every day of our lives).

Oil money has then paid for anti-nuclear regulation that makes it almost impossible to build a plant on time and on budget, while also being the wrong regulation to actually make nuclear as safe as it can be.

As an advocate for nuclear power, it's maddening to see these fossil fuel tactics work time and time again.

Hell, the fossil fuel industry also helped twist the environmentalist movement against nuclear. The Rockefeller foundation helped found Greenpeace, and kept the money flowing for decades with the requirement that Greenpeace fight against nuclear power. Friends of the Earth was directly founded by a West Coast Oil Baron for the express purpose of being an anti-nuclear alternative to the (at the time) pro-nuclear Sierra Club.

All because these ghouls wanted to make just a little more money from Peaker Plants (which are legally allowed to charge exorbitant fees for "emergency" power production)

The current US grid has more Peaker Plants than ever, all because of the fact that wind and solar are intermittent, and yet have priority on the grid. Base load plants don't handle unplanned changes in power demand well. Peaker Plants become the only option. So either methane or some sort of oil based fuel.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Rockefeller has a lot to answet for.

[–] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well the nuclear part is right so at least there's that.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Conservatives push for nuclear, not because they actually want it, but because they are hoping to create a big political shitfight that will take years to resolve. It's a delay tactic, allowing fossil fuels to continue to be profitable for as long as possible.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Ramaswamy is a used car salesman. I wouldn't put money on him actually believing any particular statement that left his mouth. Absolute grifter.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

"We are paying single women not to have a man im the house..."

Jfc.

Yes, please, just pair us all up per government sorting.

Perfect for the Republican Party then.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So, like, a republican?

[–] SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

They all are because they know their audience

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I don’t know what I expected, but somehow the “debate” is worse than that.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The elephant not in the room"

Oh, ffs.

[–] comedy@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m not watching the debate. Was that someone slamming Christie?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not watching either, I'm sure there's plenty of Christie slamming, but willing to bet that's a reference to Trump. It's got a bit of a double meaning as he has the majority of the party's support, and the Republican mascot is the elephant.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Also, he is a big lardass that weighs as much as an elephant.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Surprisingly, no.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fentanyl is ultimately coming from China. Can we stop blaming Mexico?

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Christie spitting facts.

Weird.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, China is supplying it South of the border.

The big dealers in Portland are all Honduran.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, cut off the source, the distributors have nothing to distribute.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legally, that's kind of shaky ground. You're talking about disrupting trade between two independent nations.

Not sure how we'd even go about it these days. Waaaaaay back in the day we'd hire privateers to pirate their ships.

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the Mexican government is condoning the import of a substance that is designed to kill humans, that is a different conversation.

Pretty sure they don't want this any more than we do.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fentanyl isn't designed to kill humans, is a pharmaceutical which, improperly used, CAN kill humans.

Source: Was on fentanyl for my open heart surgery. Did not die. Bonus: Propofol too! Oxy afterwards!

[–] lnm225@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, when it is pharmaceutical fentanyl. In ICU, we maintained people through horrific circumstances on fentanyl/versed drips.

But now, there are pressed pills and cocaine containing norfentanyl, carfentanyl, etc that those expecting illicit xanax or simple crack etc get dead from.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hard to cut off something that one person can make in a basement. The current supply chain is just the most economical.

[–] Kittybeer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Freaking Pence thinks he's on a pulpit.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That whole top row in the thumbnail is going nowhere.
For various Republican reasons.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see anyone in the debate going anywhere unless Trump is forcibly removed from consideration.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A very weak field

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Except Denumbnuts. He's probably going to be the nominnee.

[–] meldroc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You could replace all of them with animatronics controlled by ChatGPT, and no one would know!

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Bunch of ass-clowns.