this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
415 points (95.8% liked)

News

23267 readers
1826 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 229 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“It’s horrible for everybody. Yeah, I lost my son, it’s harder on our family, but I don’t want the rest of her life ruined too. It isn’t going to make me feel any better,” he said.

As hard as it is to say something like that... we need more people like this.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works 92 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's a nice sentiment, but..

This was premeditated. She needs to be held accountable and have consequences for what she willfully and knowingly did.

She literally killed people. I'm not sure this can be a case of "forgive and let her off lightly."

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I don’t think he's saying she shouldn't be accountable and face consequences. He's said he didn't want her to spend life in jail. That's going to be pretty radical for a lot of folks.

Some people are going to think that life in prison or the death penalty should be the minimum consequence. Others are going to think that even a monster like this can repent, change and (unlike her victims) be allowed to live free eventually.

Edit. Yikes. Important typo. “Don’t”

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For me, it's not about whether or not she can change and repent. I'm all for prison reforms that make prison safe and offer inmates opportunities for growth and self-improvement while they serve their sentences, but I think punishments need to fit crimes and this girl intentionally killed two other people. I think a sentence of 15 years to life is actually a bit lenient (I'm used to 25 years to life being the standard for premeditated murder). I don't think she should mandatorily have to spend her entire life in prison, but I also don't think she should get to enjoy even fraction of the life she robbed those two boys of. Ideally, with good behavior, I'd like to see her get out at 45-50 years of age. She would still have a few decades left, but the prime of her life would be gone—no career, no kids. That seems fair to me.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's fair, and I get it. To me, that's absolutely radical, especially if it was my child who was harmed.

I personally have just learned from experience that people who get off easy are likely to continue on the path of destructive behavior.

I'm not necessarily calling for her death or anything.. but the punishment needs to fit the crime. Two lives are permanently gone from this world because of the careless and stupid choices she made.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would agree, but I’d argue that that’s because our current system doesn’t actually rehabilitate people, and solely exists to punish people. Which solves practically nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a middle ground between life in prison and just a slap on the wrist

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree. 15 years is hardly "life" in prison, though. I think it's more than fair.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

People change. They get better. The guy who shot Reagan got better, and they let him out. Now he writes love songs and posts them on YouTube, and sells his paintings on eBay.

[–] melonlord@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The guy who shot Reagan was already better. /S

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Better if he'd hit the goddamn range once or twice...

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

15 years seems like a perfectly adequate amount of time for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does "15 years to life" mean anything? Or is it just "15 years"?

[–] MajorJimmy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Means there's a chance they get out on parole at 15 years. So they may end up with a life sentence if not approved, but regardless, she is serving 15 years.

On one hand, yes.

On the other hand, 17+15 is 32. Think of all of the things you do to get your life started between 17 and 32 and where you'd be if you'd waited to do the stuff you did at 17 until you were 32. That's a whole lot of life and life experience there.

Such a stupid senseless waste all around.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I witnessed this in a case. Young driver wasn't paying attention and crossed the line, struck head on and killed an elderly woman on her way to chemotherapy, no joke.

On the recommendation and impassioned pleas of the victim's family, the defendant plead a manslaughter charge down to a $75 fine for failure to maintain lane or some such infraction. I don't remember all the facts but was struck by the forward thinking and empathy. The young driver was truly remorseful, part of the pleas were that he had suffered enough, that the memory of what he had done was punishment enough.

[–] Morcyphr@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a nice story, in a way, but not even remotely close to this case.

[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's a direct response to another comment, not to the article.

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like that was an accident, not homicide. That isn't the same thing.

[–] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Did you read the grandparent comment?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I was reacting to the specific quote above.

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah man. I can say I would like to think I would be that forgiving of a person, but I probably wouldn't.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Ohio teenager dubbed "hell on wheels" — who was convicted of intentionally crashing her car at 100 mph into a building, killing her boyfriend and his friend — was sentenced to two concurrent 15 years to life sentences Monday.

Judge Russo shared blistering remarks and condemned Shirilla's actions saying: “She had a mission, and she executed it with precision. The mission was death.”

Judge Russo said in handing down her verdict remarks that Shirilla was “literal hell on wheels,” saying she intentionally drove at an hour when not many witnesses would be around, on a path she didn't routinely use but had visited days before.

Prosecutors argued in the trial that Shirilla had become turbulent and threatening towards her boyfriend and crashed to end their relationship.

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

Misleading as hell titles for this running around. I thought she was just driving fast based on what I saw in the headlines last week. She totally deserves the murder charges.

[–] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

A haiku about this comment section:

Healthy mind? Minor? We don't rehabilitate In the USA

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Otakulad@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I am absolutely floored that she survived too. Was she the only one wearing a seatbelt?

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was she trying to kill herself too or what? How did she survive when they both died at the scene?

[–] visak@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Luck, car engineering, and medical science. She was seriously injured. Was she trying to kill herself, I have no idea. Clearly needs mental health treatment which she's not likely to get in prison. Not that I think she should be free either.

[–] Dimok@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey so kind of off topic, but did anyone else read this and think this might be a problem? - "Police arrived to the scene around 45 minutes later."

[–] hypelightfly@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

By itself? No.

It does not say "Police arrived 45 minutes after it was reported". From that statement alone we have no idea how long between the accident and someone seeing it and reporting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pwnstar@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It took police 45 minutes to get to the scene of the crash... fucking what?

This wasn't exactly in the middle of nowhere

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is she eligible for release if she’s found guilty of two murders? Or 15 years rather than something like 40? Murder is one of the few things I think should carry a punitive sentence rather than rehab.

[–] Iteria@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I imagine it's her age. She wasn't even legally an adult, not that that excuses it. Losing all her 20s and most of her 30s basically means if she does get out at exactly 15 years she's probably much screwed her whole life even setting aside the felony on her record. Her life will look nothing like she imagined.

[–] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

That's even ignoring what being in prison for that long will do to you mentally. From what I've heard, it's almost a whole other world in there.

I can't imagine getting out after spending 15 years of my life in prison, and being able to keep the same quirks and mannerisms. Everything is just different. It's tough for fully grown adults to transition through, let alone someone who spent the last half of their teens.

That being said, neither of those two dead people will ever get to see a sunrise again. They'll never get to feel the wind on their face, or tell their parents that they love them. For what?

Intentionally murdering innocent people is despicable and soulless. I hope that they give her a lot of therapy and mental help in there. What a tragic end for such young lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

It has been statistically proven that white women get easier sentences than men of any race. Her age also probably played in to that.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Seriously glad she is off the streets, that girl is psycho.

Hadn't heard of this case before but damn, when a judge gives you concurrent cause they think you're the type of person to get time added onto your sentence is damming af

load more comments
view more: next ›