STUPIDVIPGUY

joined 1 year ago
[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

that's one way to get a leg up

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

he is an agent of capital principle

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

It has been statistically proven that white women get easier sentences than men of any race. Her age also probably played in to that.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 year ago (13 children)

ok but why did you watch 3 seasons of a show you didn't enjoy

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course you can't predict the future, and neither can motorists. What you can do is ride at a speed reasonably slow enough that you can react to people, and you can ride on the side of the pathway further from the doorways.

And like I said already, a bike on person accident at slow speed is favorable to risking my own life or life-changing injury by riding in the street.

If you're trying to change my mind, stop trying. For anyone reading this, petition your local government to build safe bike lanes with solid barriers and we won't have to have this argument.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so the only case these apply are when the cyclist isn't paying attention to their surroundings... which is the real reason it's dangerous, and when you eliminate that, I would rather have bikes passing next to people than cars passing next to bikes, because the latter is actually deadly when someone does make a mistake

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Baseless statement, elaborate

It's not more dangerous for pedestrians because I am aware and respectful of them.

So tell me exactly how it's more dangerous for me to be on a further-removed pathway, protected by a curb and other objects like light posts.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah the statement suggests as if elder people don't currently live in the same world as us today, while some of them may be out of touch, they have the same ability to understand the current climate as young people do. Some are stuck in the past but that's for too broad of a generalization

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It may be hypocritical, but have you considered that all of these forms of entertainment are unhealthy? The only difference is that they get more and more efficient with each generation, causing increasing levels of concern from each generation. That's indicative of a rising trend

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The fact that people have been concerned about this for generations doesn't automatically nullify the point. Attention and focus are skills which children must develop through boredom and long-form focus. TikTok brain is making that harder and harder for children to learn.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i have said and will continue to say that 4chan has shitty "humor"

view more: next ›