Jennifer is a lesbian. Her wife, now husband, who she’s proudly supportive of, is FtM, with 3 previous children that Jennifer adopted. Jennifer has never had penetrative sex with a man.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 104 points 1 year ago

Found the senior dev

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

… checks out.

[–] unreachable@lemmy.my.id 10 points 1 year ago

interpreter programming language

[–] SpicyKetchup@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

This would make her not a lesbian after her husband transitioned.

[–] SingularEye@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 1 year ago (4 children)

artificial insemination; beard marriage, loves her husband platonically. I am a JS dev.

[–] Kraivo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Lesbian, in marriage with another lesbian and adopted 3 kids. Still virgin.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Her partner is actually a woman, but dynamic type casts made her write "husband".

[–] unreachable@lemmy.my.id 13 points 1 year ago

and by kids, she means their cats and/or dogs

[–] IGuessThisIsForNSFW@yiffit.net 8 points 1 year ago

I was thinking they were his kids from the previous marriage, though artificial insemination works just as well!

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've had a JavaScript certification for over a decade now and I think I hate you.

[+] Comment105@lemm.ee -7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Java devs are prima mental gymnasticists, always able to make anything make sense.

[–] Konlanx@feddit.de 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

JS !== Java

Try Javascript some day!

We have truthy and falsy! Empty string or null? Yeah, that's false!
Of course we can parse a string to number, but if it's not a number it's NaN!
null >= 0 is true!
Assign a variable with =, test type equality with == and test actual equality with ===. You will NEVER use the wrong amount of = anywhere, trust me!
Our default sort converts everything to string, then sorts by UTF-16 code. So yes, [1, 10, 3] is sorted and you are going to live with it.
True + true = 2. You know I'm right.

Try Javascript today!

[–] Durotar@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Our default sort converts everything to string, then sorts by UTF-16 code. So yes, [1, 10, 3] is sorted and you are going to live with it.

I'm not sure whether this is satire or not.

[–] Konlanx@feddit.de 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's not. The default sorter does that, because that way it can sort pretty much anything without breaking at runtime. You can overwrite it easily, though. For the example above you could simply do it like this:

[3, 1, 10].sort((a, b) => a - b)

Returns: [1, 3, 10]

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Holy shit that's actually true. I just tried it

[–] sociablefish@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

The default sorter does that, because that way it can sort pretty much anything without breaking at runtime.

who the fuck decided that not breaking at runtime was more important than making sense?

this js example of [1, 3, 10].sort() vs [1, 3, 10].sort((a, b) => a - b) will be my go to example of why good defaults are important

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I made the thing in the thing print "hello world" with C# once, is Javascript for me?

[–] SouthernCanadian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

As a js dev, I will gymnastically take that as a compliment

[–] Blamemeta@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Simple. Malformed data from.a bad actor. Always sanity check your shit.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

NaN

[–] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

!NaN

(I agree)

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any senior developer who says that should instantly get a demotion to intern.

[–] Moc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are two kinds of simple

Simple to learn to use
Simple to understand, and use at a complex level.

JavaScript is the first, but definitely not the second. Rust is the second but not the first.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which part? Saying that it's simple, or making fun of saying that it's simple?

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Hol' up

[–] royal_starfish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And I thought kotlin was crazy with whatever (modifier: Modifier = Modifier) means to make it happy

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have that much difficulty with JavaScript then it’s likely you’ll suffer with any language.

[–] MakeAvoy@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except strict equality, that's a JavaScript only problem. Imagine thinking "0" should be falsy in comparison due to string literal evaluation, but truthy with logical not applied based on non-empty string. Thus !"0"=="0" is true. They couldn't just throw away == and start over nooooo let's add === . Utter madness

[–] soloner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Browser compatibility. Design flaws can't easily be fixed like how other languages can just switch to a new major version and introduce breaking changes. ES must keep backwards compatibility so has had to do more additive changes than replacing behavior altogether so that older web pages pages don't break.