Technology

37715 readers

394 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

‘What seemed like science fiction is already here’: why it’s important to talk (seriously) about neurorights (english.elpais.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Hotchpotch@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The risk, explains Yuste, is that the same tools which – in medicine – can help improve people’s lives, can also end up violating the information stored in the brain. “Although the roadmap is beneficial, these technologies are neutral and can be used for better or worse,” he notes. This isn’t only about securing personal data, such as shopping habits, a home address, or which political party one supports – it also involves things as intimate as memories and thoughts. And, in the not so distant future, even the subconscious.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nay, not going to accept those cookie policy to just read the content. Bad site design.

[–] Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Allowing you to reject it all is bad site design?!? Literally two button presses. This is the web being forced to actually respect your privacy.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did not see a reject all when viewing the website. (on firefox) I keep clicking around and did not see an option to reject all other than "Accept".

[–] Mummelpuffin@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

The thing that comes up at the bottom has two buttons: Accept and customize. If you click customize you can choose what to accept and what to reject, and it defaults to rejecting everything.

[–] Hotchpotch@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have cookies and javascript completely disabled and can read it without any problems. (firefox on laptop, noscript, idontcareaboutcookies)

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

that doesn't make the site design good, that just means you know how to bypass bad site design.

[–] Hotchpotch@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the internet ;)