this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
591 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

7194 readers
1359 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uuldika@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so, NATO's surrender then.. as a condition of a cease-fire with Ukraine.. which isn't a NATO member.. which Putin invaded ostensibly to prevent it from joining NATO. right...

sure, I think we can do that. no Western troops, no problem! we'll just give them each a few dozen hydrogen bombs, and call it even.

[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A few dozen hydrogen bombs each? Sir, this is Europe! We won’t have such uncivilised weapons that could be used for discriminatory purposes in our beautiful continent.

No, the only solution is for every country in the EU, NATO, or bordering Russia to be equipped with a Project Sundial device. It’s the only way to preserve European unity.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

If built and detonated, Sundial would have created a fireball up to 50 kilometers (30 miles) in diameter, instantly igniting everything within 400 kilometers (250 miles) and causing a magnitude 9 earthquake. It was thought that the explosion would lead to an apocalyptic nuclear winter, drastically lowering global temperatures and contaminating water sources, resulting in mass fatalities.

If detonated at an altitude of 28 miles (45 km) the Sundial device could ignite fires across an area the size of France.

The fuck is wrong with us?

neither device was ever built or tested

I know, right?

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that's 50s nuclear weapons development for ya

also probably didn't help that it's likely that Teller had autism and just wanted to make bigger bomb until he was removed from nuclear weapons design teams

[–] uuldika@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so autism caused Musk to seig heil, and autism caused Teller to build doomsday devices. so basically Dr. Strangelove is autism's final form. (/s)

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

50s were also sorta time of finding out what practical limits were, but when Teller showed them 1000Mt device USAF decided that it's a bit too much, couple Mt is plenty. when USAF tells you it's too much boom you might have gone insane

other than that, Teller was a fucking asshole, he stole credit for other's people's work, he clinged to his own failed ideas against evidence (that makes him a shitty scientist), despised Carl Sagan, he was responsible for getting Oppenheimer out of Los Alamos, also a schemer and a rabid mccarthyist the entire time. so maybe you're onto something

if he was worse at physics he'd be probably setting acetylene bottles on fire in some field or something like this

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago

I read a biography on Oppenheimer back when I was still a youngun in school, and among the few bits of trivia I remember were Teller being vile, and lozenges were a thing.

The human desire to keep feeding the fire because big fire equals more awesome. But on a truly enormous scale.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I mean, there are people who want to pursue theoretical weapons, that would completely sterilize earth, if the theoretically possible concept could be proven to actually work. Only reason we really aren't is the impracticality of the research. So, if it were more practical an idea to research, we'd be on it.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the problem becomes size and amount of expensive materials, technically it's not even particularly interesting, all parts are there and some designs were tested when thermonuclear weapons were first developed

Yes with this, I was talking about weapons that theoretically could exist, but we don't know if what we think could work will, because just researching it isn't practical. However, if that weren't the case, we absolutely would be researching things like neutronium bombs, and such.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

There's the short story "A Colder War" by Charles Stross. Among other things, there's a reference to a real-life nuclear weapon concept called Project Pluto. In the story, it turns out it was built to try and kill Cthulhu.

So... maybe that's the goal of Sundial? Cthulhu would be a valid target for a weapon that ludicrous.

Otherwise, I agree. "The fuck is wrong with us" is the only valid conclusion.