this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
542 points (97.9% liked)

World News

43863 readers
5401 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I am longing for plastic-eating bacteria to be released into the wild. There are other materials we can use.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

The medical field would be categorically fuct. Just the loss of sterile packaging would have serious consequences. Minimally invasive surgeries, joint replacements, bandages that don't adhere to wounds, stents...

Then let's consider cordage. Mountain climbing, arborists, rescue teams, sailboats (the most efficient way to cross oceans), ships, construction... the loss of just Dyneema/UHMWPE, which is a relatively new entrant to the cordage field would have seriously negative impacts.

There is a lot of energy bound up in those long molecules, and there are no unexploited niches in balanced ecosystems. There are already bacteria that can consume certain polymers under narrow conditions. Humanity is gonna be so screwed for a long time if bacteria can slip those narrow parameters.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Like what? If you're building an airplane or a sewer main all substitutes are inferior. The problem is that we're using the ultra-permanent wonder material for, like, candy wrappers.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Think of how many things around you are made of plastic. What about critical pieces of things like airplanes? What would you replace that with to prevent the bacteria from causing damage to them?

I could probably pick a few things on my desk right now that would be much more difficult and much more costly to produce with other materials.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, I am sure such a bacteria being released at this scale would have absolutely zero negative consequences

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As opposed to the alternative?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

implying there are only two possible options that could ever be imagined is not interesting

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I would like for you to meet my friend, the oyster mushroom. I'm wondering what level of soil accumulation we need to support massive, city-wide oyster mushroom blooms

[–] tree_frog@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are plastic eating microorganisms, both fungi, and bacteria.

But, they take a long time to break down plastic. I've had a fungus that can digest plastic in a mushroom cultivation bag for nine months and only one specimen has made it through so far.

I imagine splicing the gene that allows for the production of this enzyme into an ocean bound microorganism would clean up a lot of it while not affecting most of our terristrial infrastructure.

Of course, folks put plastic tubing and what not in the ocean too, so I guess we'll all have to die instead.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We first need a way to use them to consume plastic in a controlled manner. There are things that simply would not be possible without these polymers and that we do not want destroyed.