It does make sense from a payment processing standpoint. It doesn't make sense to spend more money on creating the transaction than is actually being sent.
Halosheep
joined 1 year ago
This game has no soul, it's a cross universe amalgamation of Ubisoft games but somehow manages to do nothing interesting with any of the characters or cosmetics.
Then the gameplay is just COD but somehow stiffer.
Just look at The Finals, sure, plenty of people have issues with it, but there's genuine creativity in the cosmetics and it brings something new as a shooter.
Sorry, for the pedants out there, 'why don't all stadiums have parking garage systems instead of flat parking lots?'
Why don't stadiums have their parking in large parking garages? The traffic for exiting the stadium already sucks as it is, why not a multiple entrance/exit garage system?
Sorry brother, not my problem. I was born well after those events occurred and so did these people.
Solving the problem of having an advantage based on race is not going to be solved by giving "the right" people an advantage based on race.
Economic factors should be the most weighted if any advantage is needed to be given.
Damn, someone should go back and tell my teen self that bad words aren't allowed.
I am a fucking disgrace.
As someone who lives in Texas and watches the biggest trucks be driven by the worst drivers on the road, I agree with the extra license bit. I also believe they should only be allowed to park in specifically designated spots, considering how often they don't fit in a parking spot and block parts of parking lots.
You have a significant amount of free time, don't you?
I think the way your commenting is wrong.
Are you including the fact that $100,000 in the 1950s is more than $1million after accounting for inflation?
According to some quick googling, $1,300,000 is the modern equivalent of $100,000 in 1950. That would put you in the top 5% earners (and very nearly in the top 1%). According to the IRS, the top 5% contribute about 65% of the tax burden.
The top 25% make up about 90% of contributions, but that starts around $70,000 annual income.
Seems like everyone agrees that Netflix and the writers behind the show weren't following the source material very well and were making a lot of bad decisions in terms of show direction.
Cavill is known to want to keep things close to the source material. It seems implied that the "showrunner" and writers were against that attitude, so when he started pushing back, he gets called a misogynist and g*mer for trying redirect the show.
Sounds to me like film industry bullshit and trying to redirect the narrative from someone wanting the show to stay accurate to him being misogynistic simply because he was contradicting a woman.
view more: next ›
Isn't Edge also chromium?