this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
99 points (95.4% liked)

World News

39495 readers
3445 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ngl I'd give up my firstborn to have him instead of trump

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

He's not that bad of a leader but all the polling is showing that if he's the LPC's leadership pick we will have a deeply conservative government.

We could have done a lot worse than Trudeau but we also could have done a lot better - his government has generally been one of cautious inaction while the world has been going bonkers.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

cautious inaction

Boy if that doesn't succinctly capture the tepid response to domestic and global turmoil.

Though it's kind of understandable. The disconnect between noble (enough) leaders trying to make a difference against immovable obstacles (big money, fascists, oligarchs, etc.) and their gullible poorly educated citizenry versus the snake-oil fox seeking to guard the Hen house by doling out empty promises would be amusing if the consequences weren't so dire.

Most laypeople who know no better will take empty promises and hollow truths over tough love and hard truths. Makes me think of the WV coal miners and Trump promising them clean coal while Hillary told them the unfortunate reality.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think whoever the Libs do pick is going to be in an even worse position. At least Trudeau could score some points dealing with Trump.

If they wanted to do some good, they'd either disband completely, or merge into the NDP so the left/centre vote doesn't get split. They have no problem crying "Anything But Conservative" when they're the Anything, but I doubt they'll have the grace to do it when it's not to their benefit.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago

Sir, this is a Wendy's.