this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
232 points (92.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27380 readers
1603 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Youtube always shows off all the progressive and positive aspects of Europe. Bike lanes, relable trains. Was so jealous. Then heard that my game buddy is off to manditory milatary service.

The idea that the government can take away a year of your life, and thats normal is still a tough pill to swallow.

[–] octochamp@lemmy.ml 48 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The vast majority of countries in Europe don't have military service, and it's no coincidence that the few countries which do, also border Russia.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Colourful image with no source. Just a bcbp logo which, wtf is that?

It's not even accurate. At least not for Sweden. So, if they got that wrong. I will assume the rest is possibly wrong too.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Iirc Sweden reinstated compulsory service in 2017?

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's compulsory with a huge asterisk next to it.

If they call you in, it's compulsory.

However, they call far from everyone, and there's about 1001 things you can do to not get called for service if you really don't want to.

First step is that you're sent a form to fill out. Questions about your health and habits among other things. So. If you really don't want to... Let's just say they probably won't be too interested in someone that (allegedly) smokes 1-2 pack of cigarettes a day.

Not to be confused with the Swedish concept of "Total Defense" (probably poorly translated). Should "total-defense" be called however. Everyone between 16 and 70 have to report in for war-duty. This doesn't mean everyone is going into battle. But it means you have to be at service for the defensive effort of our nation. Could be administrative tasks, logistical, construction, anything really, depends on who you are and what your experience is. This is not something you can get out of. It's one of your duties as a citizen

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No, "Total Defense" translates well. And that's an interesting system.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More is mentioned in this pdf if your curious. This one is in English.

I will highlight the most important part

we will never surrender. Any suggestion to the contrary is false.

https://www.msb.se/sv/publikationer/om-krisen-eller-kriget-kommer-pa-engelska/

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yeah everything I've read about Sweden, militarily, seems like they've spent the entire cold war making an invasion a nightmare for the invaders.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

First comment is not correct either. Everyone does not fill out a form at 18.

Maybe you should stop posting things you cannot verify.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

Seems like you added precisions in another comment, so at least now people reading this have the full picture.

As far as I'm concerned, the picture was correct for UK, Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, Poland, Belgium, Netherlands. For other countries, I was hoping other people could jump in, as you did.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

By that logic signing up for Selective Service in the US means the US doesn't have a volunteer military.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 13 points 4 days ago

Not everybody has 40k American troops stationed in their country

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Except for Greece and Turkey. They're both waiting for a cow to wander onto the wrong side of Cyprus. (I joke, but not by much)

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Finn here. The willingness to defend the country is high in Finland. For a small country like Finland it's the most cost-effective way to keep up a credible defense. I guess a professional army might be an option now with NATO membership.

And, yes. It feels like the normal thing to do.

My grandfathers did it (and fought in two wars), my father did it, my older brother did it, plenty of friends did it at the same time as me.

It's an experience you can bond over very quickly.

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Theres definatly SOME good to it. Hell, maybe that will help reduce the crime rate too*. From what ive heard, you are forced to learn a skill, so more skilled workers.

*Just came back from holiday. First taxi from the airport has dents in the doors from kids throwing rocks. Depressing here

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Probably. Pretty much anyone who wants to go career can.

It's 5-6 months for the shortest service. In my case I volunteered to drive big rigs, so 12 months and I got a driver's license that would've required two years of lorry driving as a civilian. It's been my backup plan in case my career in rocket science hadn't worked out.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago

I think there's value to mandatory military service when your aims are primarily defensive. Country gets invaded and not only are there lots of people in the army already, but also there's plenty of reserves who just need refresher training. When you're the one getting invaded, you usually don't have problems with motivation unless the current regime has really fucked up.

When you try to use a largely conscripted army for invasions, like Russia is doing, people start to wonder why the hell they're doing this.

Conversely, when your country is known for military adventurism like the United States, it's easier to motivate volunteers. They signed up for this, and as fucked up as it is, they almost want to be sent off to war in some far off land. England also has generally used a volunteer military throughout its imperialist history. Giving your citizens the choice works better if you're going to be doing imperialism.

Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you think Europe is one country?

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Doesnt the origianl post also treat Europe as one country?

[–] ours@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Kind of a compromise for smaller countries that want to have a standing army. And some countries offer alternatives like civil service or paying additional taxes instead for those that don't want to serve in the military.

The US having expensive higher education driving poorer people to join the military to afford it is bleaker honestly.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ugh, there are talks of reintroducing mandatory military service in Germany because of Russia (and a little bit for social services as one can do them as an alternative). Although I see that it might be necessary I hope that my kids won't have to serve.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't mind the idea of mandatory service to one's country, but "military" should be optional. I'm sure there's loads of important infrastructure projects that need doing, environment cleanup, various jobs to instill a sense of ownership and belonging while doing measurable good.

[–] sevon@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

At least here in Finland, the military part is optional.

"Take away a year of your life" is hyperbole.

It's not like you're dropped into 70s Vietnamese jungle with a garrot wire and some amphetamines.

It's more like a year long summer camp. Learn basic soldiering, learn some kind of speciality whether it's catering, logistics, or mechanics, and earn a good salary.

Most people go backpacking for a few years afterwards to spend the money they earned.

If you'd rather play games instead it's pretty easy to get an exemption.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Well the thing is that not rvery country has this.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

America here. I think that mandatory service is fine. Living in a largely democratic country should come with a price tag, not just be something that you get for free. E.g., immigrants that naturalize have to put a lot of effort into naturalization; as a result, they're usually much more personally invested in their civic life, on average, than typical citizens. Maybe ppl here would care more about fixing the country instead of just making sure they got theirs if they had to work for a year or two as conscripts.

[–] Qwaffle_waffle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A year in retail too, while we're at it.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Truth. The time I spent in retail made me much more patient.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Mandatory military service teaches you how kill. Why not build communities by having 1 year social working instead, certainly that teaches you more about your community.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago

Not just kill; being in the military tends to teach people to work together, even if it for mindless, stupid make-work projects. Hell, most people in the military--in the US--are in support roles, rather than being front line combat troops. That said, I thnk that mandatory service should be expanded to include roles like peace corps, habitat for humanity, food banks, etc.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately. Mandatory military service is critical to many countries survival. You NEED to have a population that understand the basics of how to organise a defense.

It's the difference between being a country or being a province.

I will quote a Major in his response to why we don't practise defense coming from the west.

"it's possible we might be attacked from the west, but it would be a very long and strange route for the Russians to take"

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The second half of your comment seems disconnected from the first? We are specifically talking about mandatory military service for community building.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No one is talking about that other than you.

Your first part is how mandatory military service is just to teach how to kill. Which is not true.

Most countries don't need military service to work on community projects. Because people already know how their communities work, and there just isn't a need for that type of slave labour.

What the military can get called in for though are things like disaster relief or searches for missing people where you need to look through a whole forest.

[–] optissima@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

E.g., immigrants that naturalize have to put a *lot* of effort into naturalization; as a result, they're usually much more personally invested in their civic life, on average, than typical citizens.

Civic Life: The public life of the citizen concerned with the affairs of the community and nation.

Person above me is talking about community building as well.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think there should be mandatory service, but not necessarily military service. Something like the old Civilian Conservation Corps.

But I'm also old enough that this policy wouldn't affect me directly, so take that as you will.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Sadly, I am too old as well. I tried to join a number of years ago, but was unable to due to a medication I was on. Waivers would have let me join during GWOT, but I was pretty opposed to our wars of choice.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

They already take more years of your life away with school