this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
503 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19282 readers
2205 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Laura Loomer criticized Elon Musk as a "welfare queen," accusing him of profiting from billions in government subsidies while advocating for H-1B visas, which she claims take jobs from Americans.

Loomer’s remarks highlight a rift within MAGA supporters over Musk's influence and Trump’s alignment with him despite prior anti-immigration promises.

Steve Bannon escalated the attack, demanding “reparations” for jobs lost to foreign workers hired by tech giants like Musk.

Musk, whose companies received over $25 billion in subsidies and contracts, defended his stance on immigration and insulted American workers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 85 points 4 days ago (11 children)

With as much as it's happening and as little that comes of it, you ever think all these "in-fights" are just a big distraction or straight-up entertainment that the Republicans put on? Scripted, fake, like Professional Wrestling. The equivalent of turning on cartoons while the parents are "busy".

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 63 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This has crossed my mind as well.

For the moment, I feel like this is real infighting. There must be push/pulls among MAGA. H-1B, for example, is one area where I could see real infighting. You have the rich MAGA (which ultimately runs the whole thing), but you've also got the poor MAGA which has been bred on a fuckton of anti-immigrant sentiment.

What might be interesting is (assuming it is indeed real infighting) if the focus on rich vs poor is brought more into the forefront due to this. That certainly isn't something the MAGA leadership wants.

But holding one's breath for more/better info is smart, for now.

What might be interesting is (assuming it is indeed real infighting) if the focus on rich vs poor is brought more into the forefront due to this. That certainly isn’t something the MAGA leadership wants.

Which is why in the end, regardless of the motivations behind these stories, we must continue to use these opportunities to point out the underlying class war that unites us. No matter the superficial drama that creates the attention, keep redirecting the focus back to that fact. Major media outlets will do what they can to avoid conveying this message, so it's on us to make it a normal conversation that can't be ignored.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You can bet the corporate funded focus groups are burning the midnight oil plotting out how to spin the "poorly educated" MAGA folks perceptions around.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

They're far too dumb to orchestrate this kind of theatre. What we are witnessing here is their... shall we say, natural talent.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

No. They have no whatsoever effect. Most Trump voters have no idea this is going on as they've already tuned out. Casuals don't follow politics.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

This is exactly what is going on. If you read a headline that's an opinion, or has may, could, slammed or hit in the title, ignore it. It's a distraction. Trump finding the shittiest most obnoxious sounding people to lead his cabinet is also part of that strategy. He usually fires them anyway. What his former POS staff has done or said are also distractions.

I was told an old saying when I was very young that I didn't truly understand until trump came along. I was sad because someone was saying bad things.:

At least they're talking about you. If they're talking about you, you're winning.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Of course it is. Trump is a big WWE fan. So much that he put lady McWWE in for a new position.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Might be a distraction.

Might not be.

Either way, as long as they're infighting, they're not actually governing. even if it is just "infighting" and not actual infighting.

So let them fight.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

The theatrics might be a bit too big of a conspiracy. I think its real. Two party system means big tent politics, most of which will be at odds.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I can't remember the name of it off the top of my head, but there's a special term for conspiratorial thinking based on the belief that leaders really can't be this incompetent and that the thought of a shadowy organization pulling the strings actually makes some people feel better.

Because reality is way fucking scarier.

These are the people running our country and they're almost exclusively all idiots.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Nah. Authoritarians always pull this shit until the cream rises to the top. Fortunately, Trump is the top. Imagine having to kow-tow to that moron and get anything done!

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It's real. Just because tech bros and magats align sometimes there is still a discrepancy between the two. At the end of the day, the Maga tech bros are just higher up the ladder from the general Maga folks. In other words: there's always bigger fish.