this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
192 points (98.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36188 readers
1169 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"never plug extension cords into extension cords" is probably the most common piece of electrical related advice I've ever heard. But if you have, say, 2 x 2m long extension cords, and you plug one into the other, why is that considered a lot more unsafe than just using a single 4 or 5 meter cord?

Does it just boil down to that extra connection creating another opportunity for the prongs to slip out and cause a spark or short circuit? Or is there something else happening there?

For that matter - why aren't super long extension cords (50 or more meters) considered unsafe? Does that also just come down to a matter of only having 2 connections versus 4 or more on a daisy chained cord?

Followup stupid question: is whatever causes piggybacked extension cords to be considered unsafe actually that dangerous, or is it the sort of thing that gets parroted around and misconstrued/blown out of proportion? On a scale from "smoking 20 packs of cigarettes a day" to "stubbing your toe on a really heavy piece of furniture", how dangerous would you subjectively rate daisy chaining extension cords, assuming it was only 1 hop (2 extension cords, no more), and was kept under 5 or 10 metres?

I'm sure there's probably somebody bashing their head against a wall at these questions, but I'm not trying to be ignorant, I'm just curious. Thank you for tolerating my stupid questions

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The longer the distance, the larger the diameter of the wire you need, due to resistance/heat.

Typically, extension cords are going to be manufactured with the thinnest wire they can get away with based on the safety requirements, in order to save on materials cost.

So plugging 2 short cords together might cover the same distance as 1 longer cord, but the longer cord will use thicker wire to maintain the proper margin of safety.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Distance by itself would be no different than a single cord of the same length.

However, connection points are areas of localized resistance where connectors meet. This can introduce dangerous areas.

That said, those aren't really the problem here:

The practical, human, problem here is important. Connectors come loose, which makes them dangerous. The majority of this thread is treating this question like a paper test problem, when in reality there are other factors that outweigh the "under ideal circumstances" problem.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Said another way: Each cable is given the minimum copper and shielding that cable needs for the length it is made.

As soon as you plug two together, you’re operating at greater resistance than either one was made for, and relying on the margin of error.

[–] Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I've run a full DJ setup with speakers, a mixer, soundboard, laptop, etc. off a single line of 6-8 daisy-chained extension cords more times than I can count.

...uh...how have I never learned of this.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

DJ’s really will find any excuse to tell you they’re a DJ

Edit: you wrote and deleted a super unhappy message so just wanted to say sorry, I was just being goofy not trying to rag on you

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 21 hours ago

Honestly that's probably not a huge electrical load.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Because you ain't loud enough lol

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But unless coiled up on the ground the longer cable also has more area to dissipate heat, so the longer cable doesn't change anything here. The heat output will be consistent for any section of the cable no matter how much more cable there is on easier side of it.

The only think that the different resistance would affect is the voltage drop to the end device. But voltage drop varies wildly so you are unlikely to have a meaningful difference caused by a few extension cords (unless maybe you are already a bad case like an apartment building to start).

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Resistance of a cable is (resistivity x Length)/(πr^2) so the residence increases with length, which is why longer extension cords are designed thicker to reduce resistance. Power grids are voltage stabilized so the voltage drop will be negligible but it will take more power to get down the daisy chain, producing more heat.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 22 hours ago

And temperature difference to ambient temperature is thermal resistivity * dissipated power / (2\*π\*radius\*length). If you will plug dissipated power = resistance * current^2 and resistance into it, you will see, that temperature difference is invariant of length.

[–] HeckGazer@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago

The longer wire (being also thicker) has less resistance and is therefore wasting less power as heat, that's where the Voltage drop is going.

Sure, most of the time it's fine if you know what you're doing, but that's why it's general wisdom and not a hard rule, like "don't put metal in the microwave", it's said to protect those that have no idea what they're doing/why the saying exists

[–] uis@lemm.ee -5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The longer the wire, the more heat it can dissipate, so no, you don't need wire to be thicker.

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure if you've ever used fuse wire before. It's what was used before capsule fuses and breakers. Essentially, if too much current goes through it, it will melt, breaking the circuit as protection. The thicker the fuse wire, the more current it can pass through without melting. The length of the wire doesn't come into it. 1cm of 10 amp fuse wire will melt at the same current as 1 meter of 10 amp fuse wire.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, maximum carried current is indeed invariant of length. I explained math behind it in https://lemm.ee/comment/17115060

[–] gazter@aussie.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We may be discussing slightly different things here, I'm not sure if I follow the application of your math in this context.

My point is that a thinner wire will get much hotter than a thicker wire, given the same amount of current. Is this not the case?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 44 minutes ago

Correct. And temperature does not depend on length. We already said it.

I have no idea whether this really is the answer but it seems like the most plausible answer.