this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
297 points (98.7% liked)

News

23651 readers
3175 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Morally it’s the right thing to do in my eyes. It’s also surprising how the pro life and pro death penalty people are the same people usually.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

It's only surprising if you know nothing about the group beyond the inaccurate name they use to identify themselves

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pro life only lasts until you're born. After that it's pro death.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

There's a very bad joke o remember hearing a long time ago. It's something along the lines of: "I'm in favor of killing babies, but I don't like to give women a choice." Most pro-life people actually are that, except they extended "baby" way before birth in a stupid way. They're fine with killing actually post-birth babies though.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I actually have a friend who’s quite… strange. He’s pretty right wing, very into certain conspiracy theories, pro musk, etc, yet one of the nicest guys you’ll meet and certainly the guy you’d be calling to bail you out of jail in a pinch. Anyways, he actually opposes the death penalty exactly because he’s pro life. Said he couldn’t reconcile both of those stances.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

That's good! That means he's at least a reasonable person. He can think for himself and can consider if ideas are idiologically consistent. I hope that eventually translates to him having empathy with people and then noticing how conservative politics fucks people over just for the sake of having an enemy though.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He didn't commute the one Boston bomber, Dylan Roof, and the Tree of Life shooter. Which is good. I don't agree with the death penalty but you can't really pardon people like that.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 41 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's not a pardon. They would still be subject to the harshest punishment possible in civilized countries, and would never again be a threat to anyone.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And the confusion here is exactly why it would have been a PR nightmare. The average American is really stupid.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most civilized countries have abolished the death penalty

[–] superkret@feddit.org 19 points 3 days ago

Thank you for clarifying my point.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Well I more just mean HE couldn't because probably that would be unpopular with the groups who were targeted by them.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think you can, especially when the sentence is still life in prison. Remember that accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt, so they would not ever be paroled.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 14 points 3 days ago

These weren't pardons, but commuted sentences. I don't know what the stipulations surrounding that are

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt

This was true, but that no longer applies. (at least at the federal level; I have no clue how state courts have ruled on this.)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Well I have to admit I agree with the court there. A pardon should not be an admission of guilt. So even though that changes what I said, I have to concur with them. Thank you for letting me know.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago

It’s also surprising how the pro life and pro death penalty people are the same people usually.

It shouldn't be. There is actually no contradiction or mutual exclusivity between the two; it only seems that way because of how the former viewpoint is labeled (it was definitely a PR move to call it "pro life" instead of "anti abortion", which is a more accurate description of the stance).

Pro lifers believe the unborn are morally equivalent to the newly born, and therefore believe killing/destroying (depending on your perspective) the unborn is equivalent to murder (defined as 'undeserved killing/execution'), since the unborn is innocent by definition. And because they, like everyone else, believe murder is immoral, they also believe abortion is immoral.

This does not conflict at all with being in favor of the death penalty for someone guilty of a major crime against humanity, because such a person is not innocent, unlike the unborn child.

In fact, on another axis, these two stances are actually in perfect alignment (except in cases of rape, etc. which I believe is why many pro lifers do in fact make exceptions for those cases, being okay with abortion then), in that they both come from the mindset of 'you must take responsibility and be held accountable for your actions'.

Hope that clears things up a bit.