this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
359 points (98.1% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3606 readers
26 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's even stranger than that.

There are a fair few trees here. But most of them aren't natural, they were planted. Planted in perfectly straight, compass-axis lines that run for about a kilometer each, slicing the plain into a giant square checker pattern.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

in my mind that's still forest, it's not like most of europe's forests are in any way natural at this point, any time you see a forest here in sweden that has a suspicious amount of oaks of the same age that's probably a forest intended to provide lumber for ships a couple hundred years ago.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I could be wrong, but it sounds like the trees form lines on a grid with no trees in the middle. Kinda like if you went insane and put trees every 10 lines in cities skylines. I wouldn't consider that a park, much less a forest.

[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think if you were looking at it from the side it would look like a weird sparse forest. 3 or 4 layers might give eenough illusion if you have some brush or other greenery mixed in.

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Where I grew up in nd tree lines were more for wind breaks than described here.

Here’s a bit a little south of Mandan, https://maps.app.goo.gl/fkns9wFp8NsnCvFy9

Trees don’t really do well around here. And bear in mind this is the more woodsy part of nd. Past this it’s mostly grasslands even more.