this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
359 points (98.1% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3606 readers
26 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

i genuinely cannot imagine such a large piece of land being 2% forest, i would lose my mind travelling through that

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's even stranger than that.

There are a fair few trees here. But most of them aren't natural, they were planted. Planted in perfectly straight, compass-axis lines that run for about a kilometer each, slicing the plain into a giant square checker pattern.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

in my mind that's still forest, it's not like most of europe's forests are in any way natural at this point, any time you see a forest here in sweden that has a suspicious amount of oaks of the same age that's probably a forest intended to provide lumber for ships a couple hundred years ago.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I could be wrong, but it sounds like the trees form lines on a grid with no trees in the middle. Kinda like if you went insane and put trees every 10 lines in cities skylines. I wouldn't consider that a park, much less a forest.

[–] 3ntranced@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I think if you were looking at it from the side it would look like a weird sparse forest. 3 or 4 layers might give eenough illusion if you have some brush or other greenery mixed in.

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Where I grew up in nd tree lines were more for wind breaks than described here.

Here’s a bit a little south of Mandan, https://maps.app.goo.gl/fkns9wFp8NsnCvFy9

Trees don’t really do well around here. And bear in mind this is the more woodsy part of nd. Past this it’s mostly grasslands even more.

[–] odium@programming.dev 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

picture a 60 mph / 100 kmph road with one lane on each side winding between endless hills covered with medium height yellow grass and dotted with the occasional grazing cow, elk, etc.

That's what most of the state looks like in my experience. Pretty beautiful.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

sure it's beautiful, the ocean is beautiful too, but that much open space would make me so uncomfortable. Denmark is bad enough.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

The ground isn't even the unnerving part; it's how much of your vision is taken up by empty sky. It makes you feel absolutely miniscule

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 6 points 3 weeks ago

It's got it's own beauty in a way. Soft rolling hills and an endless horizon.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My family drove through Kansas once when I was a kid, and yep, the Great Plains are kinda rough on the head if you aren’t used to open grasslands. It’s like being on the ocean but grassland instead of water. Just grass and land as far as the eye can see

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

The Flint Hills are beautiful

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

I grew up there, it’s a tundra/prairie biome. I grew up in the he’ll creek formation area though so lots of buttes. Any trees were largely planted by settlers.

It’s quite beautiful in its own right. Just avoid the eastern part of the state, that bits flat as a board and about as boring.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

In the fall the Farmers harvest their corn and soybeans. We live in a very flat are. In the winter you can see the frozen dirt all the way to the horizon.