this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Music

7302 readers
22 users here now

Discussion about all things music, music production, and the music industry. Your own music is also acceptable here.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SonicDeathTaco@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Like what you like. I do not like this record. It was the last Megadeth record I bought and I've listened to everyone since, at least once.

I think the worst part of that album is Dave's voice. I didn't need Mustaine to be a better singer. To me, the more he tried to be, the more obviously deficent his voice was.

My view on "Youthanasia" is mixed. It's evident how Dave Mustaine wanted to chase the top of the charts and how many metal bands had a hard time staying relevant in the 90s. With 1992's "Countdown to Extinction" Dave already attempted to streamline Megadeth's sound in a similar manner to what Metallica did with their "Black Album" and it yielded success, so "Youthanasia" was the next logical step forward. The album succeeds in that streamlining, but it happens with costs one can expect.

The overall mix is softer and more polished but it feels duller, especially compared to 1990's "Rust in Peace". Many songs have their tempo approximately at 120 BPM as the producer Max Norman wanted so, and their structure is conventional verse-chorus-type of thing. The strength of early Megadeth was in quirky song structures: technical guitar riffs, fast tempos and abrupt changes mixed in, and Mustaine snarled on top of it. "Youthanasia" has all that replaced with catchier songs and Mustaine attempting to sing melodically ("A Tout le Monde" as a good example). Yes, I get that Megadeth wanted to expand their sound and do something different, but is that evolution or many steps back? One's mileage may vary.