this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
1799 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5709 readers
4359 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

because political dissidents who are in jail for trying to overthrow a dictatorship should also be able to run. it's one of those unfortunate situations where this would be a good thing to have under an authoritarian government...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Under an authorisation government though I assume the law would be rescinded, so it's not really protecting anybody.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean becoming an authoritarian government to prevent an authoritarian government doesn't really make sense

[–] paw@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago

Sometimes you need to fight fire with fire

/s

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's like saying we shouldn't send anyone to prison because some of them might be innocent. You have to try your best with a system but that system has to be robust enough that it cannot be abused otherwise it will end up being abused.

[–] Contravariant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If you want a system that cannot be abused then don't remove the safeguards designed to fix mistakes.

Allowed innocents to be released from prison, and allow the disenfranchised to regain their voting rights.

This is why there is always a higher power to overrule previous decisions, and when it comes to elections there is no higher power than a majority.

[–] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It probably wouldn't be allowed under an authoritarian government though...

[–] lime@feddit.nu 12 points 2 days ago

of course not. the american "system of checks and balances" only works if everyone plays by the rules.